Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Gainward 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 183% | 265% |
Hitman 3 | 268% | 374% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 158% | 233% |
Resident Evil 8 | 183% | 265% |
FIFA 21 | 43% | 84% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 298% | 413% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 150% | 223% |
Genshin Impact | 183% | 265% |
The Medium | 253% | 355% |
Far Cry 6 | 309% | 427% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Gainward 1GB Edition.
The R7 250 has a 72 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti, but the GTX 650 Ti has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GTX 650 Ti exhibits a 11.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 250 has a 72 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 650 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 250 providing 1.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 250 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 650 Ti, and so the R7 250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 650 Ti.
The R7 250 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 650 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 250 also has superior memory performance overall.
The R7 250 has 60.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 650 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the R7 250 is much better than the GTX 650 Ti.
Both the Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Gainward 1GB Edition have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 650 Ti is 713 and by the R7 250 is 713. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 650 Ti is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire requires 130 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Gainward 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 250.
Core Speed | 1000 MHz | ![]() | vs | 928 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland XT (x2) | Kepler GK106-220-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 08 Oct 2013 | ![]() | vs | 10 Jan 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 8.1
|
![]() |
vs | 7
|
|
1920x1080 | 6.3
|
![]() |
vs | 5.5
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.6
|
![]() |
vs | 3.7
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.9
|
![]() |
vs | 2.4
|
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1150 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1350 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 147.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 86.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 768 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 33% | vs | ![]() | 34% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 59.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 16 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 130 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire
is a Solution of two Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition put together using AMD's Crossfire Technology. Architecture & Other Relevant Data For more information about the Architecture and Other Relevant Data, please refer to the Page of [Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition](http://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?gid=2872&graphics=Radeon%20R7%20250%20Sapphire%201GB%20Edition). Performance Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 250 1GB in Crossfire. System Suggestions Radeon R7 250 Sapphire 1GB Edition Crossfire is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We Recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Gainward 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class. This edition has no new features and so it performs exactly like the reference GeForce GTX 650 Ti. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |