Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon RX 480 PowerColor Red Dragon 4GB | GeForce GTX 780 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 37% | 69% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 3% | 19% |
Resident Evil 8 | 6% | 30% |
FIFA 21 | 47% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 49% | 83% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7% | 15% |
Genshin Impact | 6% | 30% |
The Medium | 32% | 62% |
Far Cry 6 | 53% | 88% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 480 PowerColor Red Dragon 4GB are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780.
The RX 480 has a 257 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 480. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 4.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 480. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 480 has a 257 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 480. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 5.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 480. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 480 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 780, and so the RX 480 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 780 when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The RX 480 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX 480 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 64.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 480, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is much better than the RX 480.
Both the Radeon RX 480 PowerColor Red Dragon 4GB and the GeForce GTX 780 have 2304 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the RX 480 is 2917 and by the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. Knowing that the shader performance of the RX 480 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The RX 480 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 780. This means that the RX 480 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 780.
The Radeon RX 480 PowerColor Red Dragon 4GB requires 120 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 480 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780. The GeForce GTX 780 requires 130 Watts more than the RX 480 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 780 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 480.
Core Speed | 1120 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1266 MHz | ![]() | vs | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.3 Ellesmere XT | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 01 Jun 2016 | ![]() | vs | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | 7.6
|
![]() |
vs | 6.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 5.7
|
![]() |
vs | 5.2
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 224GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 288.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2304 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2304 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 144 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 161.3 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 35.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 120 Watts | ![]() | vs | 250 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 30 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-6600K 3.5GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The Radeon RX 480 Red Dragon 4GB by Powercolor is a Performance Graphics Card based on the Third Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture. It is their non-reference, non-overclocked 4GB version of the RX 480. With a non-stock cooler and an extra DVI port, it's just sweet enough to be worth while Architecture It equips a GPU Codenamed Ellesmere XT which is a Forth Gen GCN GPU and has 36 SM activated and thus offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 144 TMUs and 32 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit runs at 1120MHz and goes up to 1266MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 8-pin connector. Performance Benchmarks Indicate Radeon RX 480 4GB is, on average, as fast as GeForce GTX 970. System Suggestions Radeon RX 480 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a High-End Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - |