Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Asus Expedition 4GB | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 53% | 154% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 40% | 133% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 35% | 125% |
FIFA 21 | 23% | 28% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 115% | 258% |
Hitman 3 | 99% | 231% |
Genshin Impact | 53% | 154% |
Far Cry 6 | 121% | 268% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 119% | 265% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 47% | 145% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Asus Expedition 4GB are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition.
The GTX 1050 Ti has a 315 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7850, but the HD 7850 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1050 Ti. As a result, the HD 7850 exhibits a 0.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1050 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 1050 Ti has a 315 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7850 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 1050 Ti providing 10.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The HD 7850 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 1050 Ti, and so the HD 7850 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 1050 Ti when running the latest games.
The GTX 1050 Ti has 3072 MB more video memory than the HD 7850, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The HD 7850 has 41.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1050 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7850 is noticeably better than the GTX 1050 Ti.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Asus Expedition 4GB has 768 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1050 Ti is 1443 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7850 is 849. The GTX 1050 Ti having 594 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1050 Ti delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7850.
The GTX 1050 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 7850. This means that the GTX 1050 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 7850.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Asus Expedition 4GB requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1050 Ti and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7850. The HD 7850 has been recommended a PSU with 200 Watts more than the GTX 1050 Ti. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7850 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1050 Ti.
Core Speed | 1290 MHz | ![]() | vs | 975 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Pascal P107 | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn PRO | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 30 Nov -0001 | vs | ![]() | 01 Jun 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.5
|
|
1920x1080 | 8.6
|
![]() |
vs | 6.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 6.2
|
![]() |
vs | 4.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 4.6
|
![]() |
vs | 3.1
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1752 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 112.1GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 768 | vs | ![]() | 1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 69% | ![]() | vs | 41% | |
Technology | 16nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 61.9 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 62.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 41.3 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 31.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 27 Amps | ![]() | vs | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3330 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Expedition by Asus is effectively another reference card of Nvidia's lower end graphics card the GTX 1050 Ti. It is competing against AMDs more affordable gaming cards, like the newer RX 470. It features a non stock fan. Architecture The Pascal Architecture aims for twice as much performance as the Maxwell Architecture and introduces support for second gen HBM. GPU It equips a GPU codenamed GP107-400 which has 6 SM activated and 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1291MHz and goes up to 1392MHz when the Boost Clock is triggered in game. Memory The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 3504MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance The GTX 1050 Ti Expedition will enable mid level graphics performance on modern AAA 2016 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 55+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution. Comparatively, this card will be faster than the performance of the outgoing GTX 960 System Suggestions This GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, like it's fellow brethren, is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a modern CPU like the i5-6500 and 8GB of RAM for minimal system bottleneck. | Radeon HD 7850 XFX Ultra OC Edition is a special edition of the powerful Radeon HD 7850. See the standard version for more information about it. The differences include an increase on the core-clock that went from 860MHz to 975MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 7% boost when compared to the standard edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |