0
Check Prices $279.00
0
Check Prices $249.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 465 GeForce GTX 275
Hitman 3 374% 386%
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 274%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 242%
FIFA 21 84% 88%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 426%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 231%
Resident Evil 8 265% 274%
Genshin Impact 265% 274%
Far Cry 6 427% 440%
The Medium 355% 366%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 275.

The GeForce GTX 275 has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed and 36 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 465. This results in the GeForce GTX 275 providing 23.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 275 has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 465, but the GeForce GTX 465 has 4 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 275. As a result, the GeForce GTX 465 exhibits a 1.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 275. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 465 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 275, and so the GeForce GTX 465 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 275.

The GeForce GTX 465 has 128 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 275, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 275 has superior memory performance.

The GeForce GTX 275 has 24.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 465, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 275 is slightly better than the GeForce GTX 465.

The GeForce GTX 465 has 352 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 275 has 240. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 275 is 349. The GeForce GTX 465 having 78 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce GTX 275 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 465 transistor size technology is 15 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 275. This means that the GeForce GTX 465 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 275. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce GTX 465 should consume less power than the GeForce GTX 275.

The GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 275 requires 219 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 275. The GeForce GTX 275 requires 19 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 465 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 275 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GTX 465.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed607 MHzvs633 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF100-030-A3Tesla G200-105-B3
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date01 May 2010vs15 Jan 2009
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.2
green tick vs
7
1920x1080
5.5
green tick vs green tick
5.5
2560x1440
3.6
green tick vs green tick
3.6
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs896 MB
Memory Speed802 MHzvs1134 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs448 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth102.7GB/secvs127GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units352vs240
Actual Shader Performance21%vs17%
Technology40nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units44vs80
Texture Rate26.7 GTexel/svs50.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs28
Pixel Rate19.4 GPixel/svs17.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs219 Watts
Recommended PSU550 Watts & 30 Ampsvs550 Watts & 40 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core 2 Quad Q8200 2.33GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs6 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

The Elder Scrolls Vvs
Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.
It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz.
Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Overview
GeForce GTX 275 is a Performance Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed G200-105-B3 which has 10 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 240 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 28 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 633MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 896MB frame buffer of GDDR3, through a 448-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1134MHz.

Features
DirectX 10.0 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 219W, it requires at least a 550W PSU and it requires at least two 6-pin available connectors.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance on average with the higher positioned GeForce GTX 280.
It is therefore even faster than the Fermi based GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants