5
10
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 560D 2GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti are massively better than the AMD Radeon RX 560D 2GB.

The GTX 1080 Ti has a 390 MHz higher core clock speed and 168 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 560D. This results in the GTX 1080 Ti providing 270.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1080 Ti has a 390 MHz higher core clock speed and 72 more Render Output Units than the RX 560D. This results in the GTX 1080 Ti providing 112.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 560D was released less than a year after the GTX 1080 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 1080 Ti has 9216 MB more video memory than the RX 560D, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 1080 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1080 Ti has 484.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560D, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1080 Ti is massively better than the RX 560D.

The Radeon RX 560D 2GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 3584. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 560D is 699 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 1080 Ti is 7654. The GTX 1080 Ti having 6955 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1080 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 560D.

The RX 560D transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 1080 Ti. This means that the RX 560D is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 1080 Ti.

The Radeon RX 560D 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti requires 220 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 560D and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 1080 Ti. The GTX 1080 Ti requires 145 Watts more than the RX 560D to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 1080 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 560D.

Can I Run It

information button related to GD Premium

Check any game system requirements

x
Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Grand Theft Auto V

32 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

105 FPS

The Witcher III

40.7 FPS

The Witcher III

118 FPS

Crysis 3

48.1 FPS

Crysis 3

143.9 FPS

Just Cause 4

33.7 FPS

Just Cause 4

100.8 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

29.3 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

87.6 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

29.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

97 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

39.4 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

118 FPS

Battlefield 1

50.9 FPS

Battlefield 1

152.2 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

37.5 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

112 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

31.9 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

95.5 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

22.7 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

68 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

31.8 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

108 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

37.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

113 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

37.7 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

112.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

91.1 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

242 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

23.3 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

69.6 FPS

Metro: Exodus

26.5 FPS

Metro: Exodus

71 FPS

Far Cry 5

42.2 FPS

Far Cry 5

126.2 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

51.3 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

153.3 FPS

Battlefield V

50.7 FPS

Battlefield V

135 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

40.6 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

121.5 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

23.3 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

69.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

32.4 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

125 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

11.8 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

54.9 FPS

The Witcher III

17.9 FPS

The Witcher III

65.7 FPS

Crysis 3

15.1 FPS

Crysis 3

58 FPS

Just Cause 4

11.7 FPS

Just Cause 4

43.1 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

13 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

38.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

17.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

50 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

11.8 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

83 FPS

Battlefield 1

23.8 FPS

Battlefield 1

82 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

13.7 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

46 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

14.8 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

38 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

10.5 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

38 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

15 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

44.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

13 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

38.9 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

14.4 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

43.1 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

23.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

71.2 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

11.1 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

39 FPS

Far Cry 5

14.2 FPS

Far Cry 5

42.5 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

17.7 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

53.1 FPS

Battlefield V

23.4 FPS

Battlefield V

64 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

22.1 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

66 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

11.4 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

34.2 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

17 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

58 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1090 MHzvs1480 MHz
Boost Clock1200 MHzvs1582 MHz
ArchitecturePolaris 10Pascal P102
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date05 Jul 2017vs05 Mar 2017
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
8
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
5.7
vs green tick
10
3840x2160
3.7
vs green tick
7.9

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs11264 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1376 MHz
Memory Bus-vs352 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth-vs484.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 3072 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs3584
Actual Shader Performance34%vs100%
Technology14nmvs16nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs224
Texture Rate61 GTexel/svs331.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs88
Pixel Rate17.4 GPixel/svs130.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs3
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs220 Watts
Recommended PSU350 Watts & 23 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.1
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL-vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-6900K 8-Core 3.2GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs3840x2160

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 560D 2GB is a middle-class graphics card based on the third revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
It equips a GPU codenamed Polaris 10 which is a 1st gen Polaris GPU, offering 896 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card is rebrand of the Radeon RX 460 and was designed and marketed towards cryptocurrency miners and low to mid-end gaming. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560D 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1600p screen res and expect around 45+FPS. THe low TDP makes it a cost effective choice for cryptocurrency miners.

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 460 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a mid range CPU and 8GB of system memory for optimal performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the top 1000 Series graphics card and considered an Enthusiast graphics card based on the Pascal architecture.

Architecture
The Pascal architecture aims for twice as much Performance as the Maxwell Architecture and introduces support for second gen HBM.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed P102-300-A1 which has 3584 Shader Processing Units, 224 TMUs and 88 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1480MHz and goes up to 1584MHz, in Boost mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 11.2GB frame buffer of second gen GDDR5X memory, through a 352-bit memory interface, while the Memory clock operates at 1376MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 220W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with 2 power connectors, a 6-pin and an 8-pin connector.

System Suggestions
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840x2160. We recommend a High-End Processor and 16GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Recommended CPU--
Possible GPU Upgrades--
GPU Variants--

Title

Body