3
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$107.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 560 4GB GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 46% 75%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 33% 60%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 29% 55%
FIFA 21 26% 12%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 29% 55%
Watch Dogs Legion 41% 69%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 109% 151%
Grand Theft Auto VI 105% 147%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 38% 66%
Genshin Impact 46% 75%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB.

The GTX 1050 has a 179 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 560, but the RX 560 has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1050. As a result, the RX 560 exhibits a 21 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1050. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1050 has a 179 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 560. This results in the GTX 1050 providing 24.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 560 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 1050, and so the RX 560 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 1050 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The RX 560 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 1050, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX 560 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1050 has 0.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1050 is marginally better than the RX 560.

The Radeon RX 560 4GB has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 560 is 1306 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 1050 is 1257. The RX 560 having 49 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 560 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 1050.

The Radeon RX 560 4GB requires 80 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB requires 75 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 560 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1050. The RX 560 requires 5 Watts more than the GTX 1050 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the RX 560 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 1050.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 3.6 FPS on Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

3.6 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 13.6 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

13.6 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 18.6 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

18.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 23.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

23.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 25.3 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

25.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 28.1 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

28.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 28.7 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

28.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 17.5 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

17.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 34.7 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

34.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 37.1 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

37.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 31.3 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

31.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 43 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

43 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 45 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

45 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 51.3 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

51.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 54 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

54 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 38.4 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

38.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 9.1 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

9.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 10.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

10.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 16.6 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

16.6 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 19.2 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

19.2 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 39 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

39 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 12.3 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

12.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 7.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

7.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 17 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

17 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 19.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 13.1 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

13.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 4GB gets 20.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

20.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D 2GB gets 7 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

7 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1175 MHzvs1354 MHz
Boost Clock1275 MHzvs1455 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Baffin XTPascal P107
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date18 Apr 2017vs30 Nov -0001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
8.8
green tick vs
8.1
2560x1440
6.4
green tick vs
5.8
3840x2160
4.9
green tick vs
4.3

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112GB/secvs112.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs640
Actual Shader Performance63%vs60%
Technology14nmvs14nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs40
Texture Rate75.2 GTexel/svs54.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate18.8 GPixel/svs43.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)5120x2880vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power80 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Wattsvs300 Watts & 27 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.1
Shader Model-vs5
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD Ryzen R5 1400vsIntel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 560 4GB is an Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the 4th Generation of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Polaris 21 which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz, 7GHz effective.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 80W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power, meaning no Extra Connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560 4GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1080p screen res and expect around 45+FPS

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 560 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
The latest GeForce GTX 1050 Inno 3D edition is a small form factor version of Nvidia's lower end graphics card, designed to compete against AMDs more affordable gaming cards, like the RX 460 or RX 470 and expected to replace the outgoing GTX 960. it features Inno3D's iChill cooling system.

Architecture
The Pascal Architecture aims for twice as much performance as the Maxwell Architecture and Introduces support for Second Gen HBM.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GP107-400 which has 5 SM activated and thus 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1354MHz and goes up to 1455MHz with the Boost Clock.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 3504MHz which is outstanding.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
This card will enable mid level graphics performance on modern AAA 2016 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 960.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Inno3D edition is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1600x900 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-6500 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-