2.8
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$200.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 51% 1%
Hitman 3 96% 28%
Resident Evil 8 51% 1%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 38% 10%
FIFA 21 24% 50%
Grand Theft Auto VI 112% 39%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 33% 13%
Genshin Impact 51% 1%
Far Cry 6 118% 43%
The Medium 88% 23%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB.

The RX 560 has a 103 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 176 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 560. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 182.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 560. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX 560 has a 103 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 32 more Render Output Units than the RX 560. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 32.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 560. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 560 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 780 Ti, and so the RX 560 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 780 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 780 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the RX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 780 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 780 Ti has 224 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780 Ti is massively better than the RX 560.

The Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition has 2880. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 560 is 1306 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 Ti is 3275. The GTX 780 Ti having 1969 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 560.

The RX 560 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 780 Ti. This means that the RX 560 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 780 Ti.

The Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 560 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 780 Ti. The GTX 780 Ti requires 175 Watts more than the RX 560 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 560.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 3.5 FPS on Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

3.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 13.2 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

13.2 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 27.2 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

27.2 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 28.8 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

28.8 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 33.6 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

33.6 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 35.9 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

35.9 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 49.7 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

49.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 53.4 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

53.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 8.8 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

8.8 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 19.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

19.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 37.7 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

37.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 11.4 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

11.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB gets 16.5 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

16.5 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1175 MHzvs1072 MHz
Boost Clock1275 MHzvs1137 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Baffin XTKepler GK110-425-B1
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date18 Apr 2017vs12 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
8.7
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
6.3
vs green tick
8
3840x2160
4.8
vs green tick
5.9

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112GB/secvs336GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs2880
Actual Shader Performance63%vs100%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs240
Texture Rate75.2 GTexel/svs257.3 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs48
Pixel Rate18.8 GPixel/svs51.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)5120x2880vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs250 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Wattsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
\\r\\Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB is a Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the 4th Generation of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

\\r\\nGPU
\\r\\nIt equips a GPU Codenamed Polaris 21 which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

\\r\\nMemory
\\r\\nThe GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz, 7GHz effective.

\\r\\nPower Consumption
\\r\\nWith a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power, meaning no Extra Connectors are required.

\\r\\nPerformance
\\r\\nThis graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1080p screen res and expect around 45+FPS. It may struggle with the latest high-end AAA titles due to the limited available VRAM.

\\r\\nSystem Suggestions
\\r\\Radeon RX 560 Asus Dual Fan OC 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
This edition comes with a custom double fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 780 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 875MHz to 1072MHz while its boost clock is now of 1137MHz. The memory clock was left untouched.
Benchmarks indicate a 10% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this card surpasses the mighty GeForce GTX 690.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-