2.8
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$119.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 49% 1%
Hitman 3 94% 28%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 37% 10%
Resident Evil 8 49% 1%
FIFA 21 25% 50%
Grand Theft Auto VI 110% 39%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 32% 13%
The Medium 87% 23%
Genshin Impact 49% 1%
Far Cry 6 116% 43%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB.

The RX 560 has a 103 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 176 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 560. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 182.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 560. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX 560 has a 103 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 32 more Render Output Units than the RX 560. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 32.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 560. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 560 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 780 Ti, and so the RX 560 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 780 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 780 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the RX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 780 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 780 Ti has 224 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780 Ti is massively better than the RX 560.

The Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition has 2880. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 560 is 1326 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 Ti is 3275. The GTX 780 Ti having 1949 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 560.

The RX 560 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 780 Ti. This means that the RX 560 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 780 Ti.

The Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB requires 80 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 560 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 780 Ti. The GTX 780 Ti requires 170 Watts more than the RX 560 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 560.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 3.5 FPS on Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

3.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 13.3 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

13.3 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 27.4 FPS on Horizon: Zero Dawn

Horizon: Zero Dawn

27.4 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 29 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

29 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 33.9 FPS on Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord

33.9 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 36.2 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

36.2 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 50.1 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

50.1 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 53.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

53.9 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 8.9 FPS on Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

8.9 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 19.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

19.7 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 38 FPS on Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

38 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 11.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

11.5 FPS

Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB gets 16.6 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

16.6 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1175 MHzvs1072 MHz
Boost Clock1295 MHzvs1137 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Baffin XTKepler GK110-425-B1
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date18 Apr 2017vs12 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
8.7
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
6.3
vs green tick
8
3840x2160
4.8
vs green tick
5.9

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112GB/secvs336GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1024vs2880
Actual Shader Performance64%vs100%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units64vs240
Texture Rate75.2 GTexel/svs257.3 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs48
Pixel Rate18.8 GPixel/svs51.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)5120x2880vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power80 Wattsvs250 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Wattsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB is an Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the 4th Generation of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Polaris 21 which has 16 Compute Units activated and thus 1024 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. It features a Boost overclock from 1275MHz to 1295MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz, 7GHz effective.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 80W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for Power, meaning no Extra Connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 900p screen res and expect around 45+FPS

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 560 XFX Double Dissipation OC 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. Higher resolutions will be an issue due to the limited 2GB of VRAM.. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
This edition comes with a custom double fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 780 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 875MHz to 1072MHz while its boost clock is now of 1137MHz. The memory clock was left untouched.
Benchmarks indicate a 10% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this card surpasses the mighty GeForce GTX 690.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-