10
10
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB.

The RX Vega has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1080 Ti. This results in the RX Vega providing 52.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX Vega has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 1080 Ti, but the GTX 1080 Ti has 24 more Render Output Units than the RX Vega. As a result, the GTX 1080 Ti exhibits a 34.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX Vega. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX Vega was released less than a year after the GTX 1080 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 1080 Ti has 3072 MB more video memory than the RX Vega, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 1080 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 1080 Ti has 228.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX Vega, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 1080 Ti is massively better than the RX Vega.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 3584. However, the actual shader performance of the RX Vega is 3994 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 1080 Ti is 7654. The GTX 1080 Ti having 3660 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 1080 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX Vega.

The RX Vega transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 1080 Ti. This means that the RX Vega is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 1080 Ti.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB requires 200 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti requires 220 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the RX Vega and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 1080 Ti. The GTX 1080 Ti requires 20 Watts more than the RX Vega to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 1080 Ti to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the RX Vega.

Can I Run It

information button related to GD Premium

Check any game system requirements

x
Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Grand Theft Auto V

78.7 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

105 FPS

The Witcher III

99.9 FPS

The Witcher III

118 FPS

Crysis 3

118.2 FPS

Crysis 3

143.9 FPS

Just Cause 4

82.8 FPS

Just Cause 4

100.8 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

72 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

87.6 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

73.2 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

97 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

96.9 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

118 FPS

Battlefield 1

125 FPS

Battlefield 1

152.2 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

92 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

112 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

78.5 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

95.5 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

55.9 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

68 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

78 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

108 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

92.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

113 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

92.7 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

112.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

223.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

242 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

57.1 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

69.6 FPS

Metro: Exodus

65 FPS

Metro: Exodus

71 FPS

Far Cry 5

103.6 FPS

Far Cry 5

126.2 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

125.9 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

153.3 FPS

Battlefield V

124.6 FPS

Battlefield V

135 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

99.8 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

121.5 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

57.1 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

69.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

79.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

125 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

29.1 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

54.9 FPS

The Witcher III

43.9 FPS

The Witcher III

65.7 FPS

Crysis 3

37 FPS

Crysis 3

58 FPS

Just Cause 4

28.6 FPS

Just Cause 4

43.1 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

31.8 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

38.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

50 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

29.1 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

83 FPS

Battlefield 1

58.5 FPS

Battlefield 1

82 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

33.6 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

46 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

36.3 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

38 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

25.8 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

38 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

36.8 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

44.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

32 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

38.9 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

35.4 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

43.1 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

58.5 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

71.2 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

27.3 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

39 FPS

Far Cry 5

34.9 FPS

Far Cry 5

42.5 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

43.6 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

53.1 FPS

Battlefield V

57.5 FPS

Battlefield V

64 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

54.2 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

66 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

28.1 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

34.2 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

41.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

58 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1500 MHzvs1480 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1582 MHz
ArchitectureVega 10 XTPascal P102
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date30 Sep 2017vs05 Mar 2017
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
10
green tick vs green tick
10
2560x1440
9.2
vs green tick
10
3840x2160
7.1
vs green tick
7.9

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs11264 MB
Memory Speed500 MHzvs1376 MHz
Memory Bus2048 Bitvs352 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-2vsGDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth256GB/secvs484.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 3072 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs yes
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs3584
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology14nmvs16nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs224
Texture Rate384 GTexel/svs331.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs88
Pixel Rate96 GPixel/svs130.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)3840x2160vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections3vs3
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs220 Watts
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12vs12.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-6900K 8-Core 3.2GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution3840x2160vs3840x2160

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming small form factor (SFF) Graphics Card based on the Fourth (4.0) Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The Vega 10 Pro GPU offers support for HBM-2 Memory, DirectX 12.0 and Open GL 4.5. While the Radeon RX Vega Eclipse and Nova use a slightly faster Vega 10 XT GPU, the Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB will still likely offer performance faster than a GeForce GTX 1070 yet slower than a GTX 1080. Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GPU has 64 Compute Units activated, offering 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This puts its performance roughly in line with $350 GeForce GTX 1070.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1500MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with stacked HBM-2 Memory and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 2048-bit memory interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However,the GPU itself is aimed for 1440p Gaming. The RX Vega Core's performance at this resolution should be excellent, however users with 4K displays may find it bottlenecks performance.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 200W, it requires at least a 550W PSU with two available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB competes with the GeForce GTX 1070 8GB, which is available for $349.
However, the ultra-wide HBM2 memory may offer the Radeon RX Vega an advantage at higher resolutions, while the SFF means it can excell if mini-ITX builds.
System Suggestions
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB HBM2 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560 x1440 (1440p). We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.is
Overview
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the top 1000 Series graphics card and considered an Enthusiast graphics card based on the Pascal architecture.

Architecture
The Pascal architecture aims for twice as much Performance as the Maxwell Architecture and introduces support for second gen HBM.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed P102-300-A1 which has 3584 Shader Processing Units, 224 TMUs and 88 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1480MHz and goes up to 1584MHz, in Boost mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 11.2GB frame buffer of second gen GDDR5X memory, through a 352-bit memory interface, while the Memory clock operates at 1376MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 220W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with 2 power connectors, a 6-pin and an 8-pin connector.

System Suggestions
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is best suited for resolutions up to and including 3840x2160. We recommend a High-End Processor and 16GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Recommended CPU--
Possible GPU Upgrades--
GPU Variants--

Title

Body