10
8
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB
Cyberpunk 2077 5% 36%
eFootball PES 2020 57% 39%
The Division 2 6% 51%
Doom Eternal 40% 15%
Metro: Exodus 6% 51%
Borderlands 3 27% 5%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6% 51%
Watch Dogs Legion 27% 5%
Total War: Three Kingdoms 2% 40%
FIFA 20 58% 40%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB.

The GTX 1060 has a 94 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX Vega, but the RX Vega has 184 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1060. As a result, the RX Vega exhibits a 269.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1060. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1060 has a 94 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX Vega, but the RX Vega has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 1060. As a result, the RX Vega exhibits a 19.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 1060. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX Vega was released over a year more recently than the GTX 1060, and so the RX Vega is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 1060.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The RX Vega has 5120 MB more video memory than the GTX 1060, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX Vega also has superior memory performance overall.

The RX Vega has 63.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1060, which means that the memory performance of the RX Vega is much better than the GTX 1060.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB has 1152. However, the actual shader performance of the RX Vega is 3994 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 1060 is 2084. The RX Vega having 1910 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX Vega delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 1060.

The RX Vega transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 1060. This means that the RX Vega is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 1060.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB requires 200 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB requires 120 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the RX Vega and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 1060. The RX Vega requires 80 Watts more than the GTX 1060 to run. The difference is significant enough that the RX Vega may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1060.

Can I Run It

information button related to GD Premium

Check any game system requirements

x
Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Grand Theft Auto V

78.7 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

55.2 FPS

The Witcher III

99.9 FPS

The Witcher III

70.1 FPS

Crysis 3

118.2 FPS

Crysis 3

82.9 FPS

Just Cause 4

82.8 FPS

Just Cause 4

58 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

72 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

50.5 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

73.2 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

51.4 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

96.9 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

67.9 FPS

Battlefield 1

125 FPS

Battlefield 1

87.6 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

92 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

64.5 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

78.5 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

55 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

55.9 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

39.2 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

78 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

54.7 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

92.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

65.1 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

92.7 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

65 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

223.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

157 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

57.1 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

40.1 FPS

Metro: Exodus

65 FPS

Metro: Exodus

45.6 FPS

Far Cry 5

103.6 FPS

Far Cry 5

72.7 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

125.9 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

88.3 FPS

Total War: Three Kingdoms

59.7 FPS

Total War: Three Kingdoms

41.9 FPS

Battlefield V

124.6 FPS

Battlefield V

87.4 FPS

The Division 2

73.7 FPS

The Division 2

51.7 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

99.8 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

70 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

57.1 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

40.1 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

79.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

55.8 FPS

The Witcher III

64.1 FPS

The Witcher III

44.9 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

40.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

28.6 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

113.2 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

79.4 FPS

Battlefield 1

95.4 FPS

Battlefield 1

66.9 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

40.9 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

28.7 FPS

Far Cry 5

97.9 FPS

Far Cry 5

68.7 FPS

The Division 2

78 FPS

The Division 2

54.7 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

50.4 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

35.4 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

29.1 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

20.4 FPS

The Witcher III

43.9 FPS

The Witcher III

30.8 FPS

Crysis 3

37 FPS

Crysis 3

25.9 FPS

Just Cause 4

28.6 FPS

Just Cause 4

20.1 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

31.8 FPS

Final Fantasy XV

22.3 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.8 FPS

Assassins Creed: Origins

30.7 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

29.1 FPS

Rise of the Tomb Raider

20.4 FPS

Battlefield 1

58.5 FPS

Battlefield 1

41 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

33.6 FPS

Assassins Creed: Unity

23.5 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

36.3 FPS

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

25.4 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

25.8 FPS

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

18.1 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

36.8 FPS

Total War: Warhammer 2

25.8 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

32 FPS

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

22.4 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

35.4 FPS

Hitman 2 (2018)

24.8 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

58.5 FPS

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

41 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

27.3 FPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

19.2 FPS

Metro: Exodus

23.6 FPS

Metro: Exodus

16.6 FPS

Far Cry 5

34.9 FPS

Far Cry 5

24.5 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

43.6 FPS

PlayerUnknowns Battlegrounds

30.6 FPS

Total War: Three Kingdoms

19.9 FPS

Total War: Three Kingdoms

14 FPS

Battlefield V

57.5 FPS

Battlefield V

40.3 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

54.2 FPS

Forza Horizon 4

38 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

28.1 FPS

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

19.7 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

41.6 FPS

Far Cry: New Dawn

29.2 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1500 MHzvs1594 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1809 MHz
ArchitectureVega 10 XTPascal P106-300-A1
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Sep 2017vs18 Aug 2016
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
10
green tick vs green tick
10
2560x1440
9.2
green tick vs
7.7
3840x2160
7.1
green tick vs
5.8

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed500 MHzvs2002 MHz
Memory Bus2048 Bitvs192 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-2vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth256GB/secvs192.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs1152
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology14nmvs16nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs72
Texture Rate384 GTexel/svs114.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs48
Pixel Rate96 GPixel/svs76.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)3840x2160vs7680x4320
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections3vs3
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs120 Watts
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs400 Watts & 27 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12vs12.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i5-6600K 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution3840x2160vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB is an Enthusiast gaming small form factor (SFF) Graphics Card based on the Fourth (4.0) Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The Vega 10 Pro GPU offers support for HBM-2 Memory, DirectX 12.0 and Open GL 4.5. While the Radeon RX Vega Eclipse and Nova use a slightly faster Vega 10 XT GPU, the Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB will still likely offer performance faster than a GeForce GTX 1070 yet slower than a GTX 1080. Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB GPU has 64 Compute Units activated, offering 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This puts its performance roughly in line with $350 GeForce GTX 1070.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1500MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with stacked HBM-2 Memory and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 2048-bit memory interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 8GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However,the GPU itself is aimed for 1440p Gaming. The RX Vega Core's performance at this resolution should be excellent, however users with 4K displays may find it bottlenecks performance.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 200W, it requires at least a 550W PSU with two available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB competes with the GeForce GTX 1070 8GB, which is available for $349.
However, the ultra-wide HBM2 memory may offer the Radeon RX Vega an advantage at higher resolutions, while the SFF means it can excell if mini-ITX builds.
System Suggestions
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano 8GB HBM2 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560 x1440 (1440p). We recommend a Very Strong Processor and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.is
Overview
The GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB is an overclocked variant of the current entry level Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB graphics card, based on the Pascal Architecture. It comes with locked memory of 3GB instead of the full 6GB.

Architecture
It equips a GPU Codenamed P106-300-A1 which is a first gen Pascal GPU and has 9 SM activated, offering 1152 Shader Processing Units (the GTX 1060 6GB version offers 1280 SPU), 72 TMUs and 48 ROPs.

GPU
The central unit runs at 1594MHz and goes up to 1809MHz, when Boost mode is activated.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 3GB frame buffer of GDDR5, through a 192-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 2002MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 400W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 3GB is a high performance GPU. This grpahics card will run most triple A games at 1440p on medium/high graphics with frames per second of 60+. At 1080p screen resolution this card will run the same games at very high graphic settings at 60+fps. The 3GB memory reduction that will hamper the high quality game textures this card can deliver, making it less future proof as more GPU memory dependent games are released.
Recommended CPU-Intel Xeon E5-4640
AMD Opteron 6276
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
Intel Core i7-4790T 4-Core 2.7GHz
Possible GPU Upgrades-GeForce RTX 2060 6GB
GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon RX 480 8GB
Radeon R9 390X
GPU Variants--

Title

Body