0
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$455.00
0
Check Prices $279.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX Vega 11 GeForce GTX 465
Cyberpunk 2077 253% 265%
Hitman 3 359% 374%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 223% 233%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 213% 223%
FIFA 21 78% 84%
Grand Theft Auto VI 397% 413%
Far Cry 6 411% 427%
Genshin Impact 253% 265%
Battlefield 6 359% 374%
Resident Evil 8 253% 265%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465.

The RX Vega has a 456 MHz higher core clock speed and 52 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 465. This results in the RX Vega providing 75.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX Vega has a 456 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 465. This results in the RX Vega providing 48.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX Vega was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 465, and so the RX Vega is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 465 when running the latest games.

The RX Vega has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 465, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX Vega also has superior memory performance overall.

The RX Vega has 306.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 465, which means that the memory performance of the RX Vega is massively better than the GeForce GTX 465.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 has 1536 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 465 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the RX Vega is 1188 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427. The RX Vega having 761 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX Vega delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 465.

The RX Vega transistor size technology is 26 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 465. This means that the RX Vega is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 465. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the RX Vega should consume less power than the GeForce GTX 465.

The GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts to run but there is no entry for the RX Vega. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the RX Vega and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465. The GeForce GTX 465 has been recommended a PSU with 150 Watts more than the RX Vega. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 465 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX Vega.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

Radeon RX Vega 11 gets 9 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 11 gets 5.9 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

5.9 FPS

Radeon RX Vega 11 gets 2.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2.7 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1063 MHzvs607 MHz
Boost Clock1190 MHzvs-
ArchitectureVegaFermi GF100-030-A3
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date28 Feb 2018vs01 May 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9
vs green tick
9.4
1600x900
7
vs green tick
7.2
1920x1080
5.5
green tick vs green tick
5.5
2560x1440
3.9
green tick vs
3.6
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed1600 MHzvs802 MHz
Memory Bus1024 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-2vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth409.6GB/secvs102.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1536vs352
Actual Shader Performance57%vs21%
Technology14nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units96vs44
Texture Rate102 GTexel/svs26.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs32
Pixel Rate68 GPixel/svs19.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-200 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Wattsvs550 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12vs12.0
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL-vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i5-760 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview Radeon RX Vega M GH is a dedicated Graphics processor found in Intel's Desktop 8th Gen G-Series CPUs. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed Vega M which offers 24 Compute Units, 96 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 1063MHz and goes up to 1190MHz in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU utilises its own onboard HBM2 memory. Radeon RX Vega M GH has 4GB of second-generation High Bandwidth Memory, clocked at 1.6Gb/s. Sat on a 1024-bit memory interface, this provides total memory bandwidth of 204.8GB/s. Performance The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance similar to a dedicated GeForce GTX 1060. Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools. System Suggestions We recommend 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon RX Vega M GH.GeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.
It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz.
Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-