Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) | Radeon HD 8180 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1723% | 4729% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1567% | 4317% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 1513% | 4174% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 2465% | 6695% |
FIFA 21 | 819% | 2336% |
Genshin Impact | 1723% | 4729% |
Far Cry 6 | 2537% | 6887% |
Hitman 3 | 2271% | 6182% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 1658% | 4558% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 2513% | 6823% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) are massively better than the AMD Radeon HD 8180.
The Graphics Mobile has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 8180, but the Radeon HD 8180 has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics Mobile. As a result, the Radeon HD 8180 exhibits a 0.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Graphics Mobile. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Graphics Mobile has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 8180, but the Radeon HD 8180 has 2 more Render Output Units than the Graphics Mobile. As a result, the Radeon HD 8180 exhibits a 0.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Graphics Mobile. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Graphics Mobile was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD 8180, and so the Graphics Mobile is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD 8180.
The HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) and the Radeon HD 8180 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The Graphics Mobile has 8.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 8180, which means that the memory performance of the Graphics Mobile is marginally better than the Radeon HD 8180.
The HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 8180 has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics Mobile is 10 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 8180 is 19. The Radeon HD 8180 having 9 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Graphics Mobile performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The Graphics Mobile transistor size technology is 6 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 8180. This means that the Graphics Mobile is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 8180.
The HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) requires 4 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 8180 requires 4 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 300 MHz | ![]() | vs | 225 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 850 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Broadwell | Kalindi LP | |||
OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 30 Mar 2015 | ![]() | vs | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | - | vs | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 800 MHz | ![]() | vs | 533 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR3 |
Memory Bandwidth | 25.6GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 17.1GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 12 | vs | ![]() | 128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | vs | ![]() | 1% | |
Technology | 22nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 4 | vs | ![]() | 8 | |
Texture Rate | 1.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 1.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 2 | vs | ![]() | 4 | |
Pixel Rate | 0.6 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 0.9 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 4 Watts | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 Watts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 11.1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 11.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.0 | vs | ![]() | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) are integrated graphics in the budget Celeron and Pentium Broadwell Mobile processors. Their performance depends on the processor they are integrated on, as the latter defines the Base and Boost Clock, as well as on the SYSTEM RAM, which defines the operating memory clock, and whether the GPU accesses a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. Best case scenario, the Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Broadwell) performs on par with Intel HD 4000 Graphics and so most modern demanding games will not be playable. Less graphically intense games will be playable at lower graphics settings. | Radeon HD 8180 is an integrated graphics card on some of the Kabini APUs. It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and shares the main system memory of up to 533MHz, on a 128-bit memory interface, whereas the memory bandwidth and performance will depend heavily on the laptop configuration. The codenamed Kalindi LP Core offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs and comes optimized for low power consumption. Even assuming the best combination possible, expect its performance to be slower than an Intel HD 2000 and thus the card is hardly suited for any gaming. Its biggest advantage is its ridiculously lower power consumption. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |