Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 2050 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 52% | 1% |
Hitman 3 | 97% | 28% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 39% | 10% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 34% | 13% |
FIFA 21 | 23% | 50% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 113% | 39% |
Far Cry 6 | 119% | 43% |
Genshin Impact | 52% | 1% |
Battlefield 6 | 97% | 28% |
Resident Evil 8 | 52% | 1% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 2050.
The GeForce GTX 2050 has a 282 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 200 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 2050. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 203.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 2050. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GeForce GTX 2050 has a 282 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780 Ti, but the GTX 780 Ti has 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 2050. As a result, the GTX 780 Ti exhibits a 8.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 2050. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 780 Ti was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 2050, and so the GTX 780 Ti is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 2050 when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GeForce GTX 2050 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 780 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The GTX 780 Ti has 223.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 2050, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780 Ti is massively better than the GeForce GTX 2050.
The GeForce GTX 2050 has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition has 2880. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 2050 is 931 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 Ti is 3275. The GTX 780 Ti having 2344 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 2050.
The GeForce GTX 2050 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 780 Ti. This means that the GeForce GTX 2050 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 780 Ti.
The GeForce GTX 2050 requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GeForce GTX 2050 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 780 Ti. The GTX 780 Ti requires 175 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 2050 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 2050.
Core Speed | 1354 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1072 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1137 MHz | |
Architecture | Turing T107 | Kepler GK110-425-B1 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Poor | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 30 Nov -0001 | vs | ![]() | 12 Dec 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 8.6
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
2560x1440 | 6.3
|
vs | ![]() |
8
|
|
3840x2160 | 4.7
|
vs | ![]() |
5.9
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1752 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1750 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 112.1GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 336GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | vs | ![]() | 2880 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 45% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | ![]() | 240 | |
Texture Rate | 54.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 257.3 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 43.3 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 51.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | ![]() | vs | 250 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 27 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The GeForce GTX 2050 is an expect Nvidia low-end graphics card due to launch in 2019. The GTX 2050 is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and expected to replace the outgoing GTX 1050. Architecture The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Turing Architecture. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing T107-400 which has [TBA] SM activated and thus [TBA] Shader Processing Units, [TBA] TMUs and [TBA] ROPs. The central unit runs at [TBA]MHz and goes up to [TBA]MHz with the Boost Clock. Memory The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 3504MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance The GTX 2050 will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2018 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution. Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti. System Suggestions The GeForce GTX 2050 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1600x900 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-7500 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance. | GeForce GTX 780 Ti EVGA Classified Kingpin Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 780 Ti. This edition comes with a custom double fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 780 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 875MHz to 1072MHz while its boost clock is now of 1137MHz. The memory clock was left untouched. Benchmarks indicate a 10% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this card surpasses the mighty GeForce GTX 690. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |