3.8
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$243.78 -6%
7.4
Check Prices
Estimated Price:
$179.99
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB
Red Dead Redemption 2 19% 2%
Halo: Reach 62% 69%
Cyberpunk 2077 64% 34%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19% 2%
Doom Eternal 2% 16%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 64% 34%
Grand Theft Auto VI 82% 49%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 27% 40%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 64% 34%
Need For Speed Heat 19% 2%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a 317 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 570, but the RX 570 has 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 1650. As a result, the RX 570 exhibits a 66.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 1650. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a 317 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 570 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce GTX 1650 providing 10.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce GTX 1650 was released over a year more recently than the RX 570, and so the GeForce GTX 1650 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the RX 570.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The RX 570 has 4096 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 1650, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX 570 also has superior memory performance overall.

The RX 570 has 95.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 1650, which means that the memory performance of the RX 570 is massively better than the GeForce GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 1650 is 1492 and the actual shader performance of the RX 570 is 2744. The RX 570 having 1252 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 570 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the RX 570. This means that the GeForce GTX 1650 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the RX 570.

The GeForce GTX 1650 requires 75 Watts to run and the Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB requires 195 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GeForce GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the RX 570. The RX 570 requires 120 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 1650 to run. The difference is significant enough that the RX 570 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 27 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

27 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 37 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

37 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 30.9 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

30.9 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 42 FPS on Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

42 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 31.5 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

31.5 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 40.1 FPS on Assassins Creed: Odyssey

Assassins Creed: Odyssey

40.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 33.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

33.5 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 40.1 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

40.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 33.8 FPS on Control

Control

33.8 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 40.2 FPS on Control

Control

40.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 36 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

36 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 58.6 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands

58.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 41 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

41 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 68.6 FPS on Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

68.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 41.4 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

41.4 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 50.7 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

50.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 42.8 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

42.8 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 61.8 FPS on Middle-earth: Shadow of War

Middle-earth: Shadow of War

61.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 43.4 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

43.4 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 54.7 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

54.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 43.6 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

43.6 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 37.9 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

37.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 43.6 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

43.6 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 43.4 FPS on Total War: Warhammer 2

Total War: Warhammer 2

43.4 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 45.3 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

45.3 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 51 FPS on The Witcher III

The Witcher III

51 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 48.7 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

48.7 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 45.1 FPS on Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

45.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 49.5 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

49.5 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 70.1 FPS on Hitman 2 (2018)

Hitman 2 (2018)

70.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 54.7 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

54.7 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 81.1 FPS on Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

81.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 56 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

56 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 77 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

77 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 56.3 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

56.3 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 45.9 FPS on Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

45.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 60.8 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

60.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 62.4 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

62.4 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 65 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

65 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 66 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

66 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 76 FPS on Forza Horizon 4

Forza Horizon 4

76 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 90.3 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

90.3 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 97.6 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus

97.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 19.2 FPS on Control

Control

19.2 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 26.2 FPS on Control

Control

26.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 21.5 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

21.5 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 42.8 FPS on The Division 2

The Division 2

42.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 21.5 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

21.5 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 28.2 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

28.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 27.8 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

27.8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 16.2 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

16.2 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 20.6 FPS on Assassins Creed: Origins

Assassins Creed: Origins

20.6 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 16.2 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

16.2 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 20.9 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

20.9 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 18.9 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

18.9 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 35.1 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

35.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 19.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

19.2 FPS

Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB gets 28.1 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

28.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1650 gets 35.2 FPS on Wolfenstein: Youngblood

Wolfenstein: Youngblood

35.2 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1485 MHzvs1168 MHz
Boost Clock1665 MHzvs1340 MHz
ArchitectureTuring T107GCN 1.3 Polaris 20 XL
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date27 Apr 2019vs18 Apr 2017
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
9.4
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
7.1
vs green tick
7.8
3840x2160
5.5
vs green tick
5.9

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs8192 MB
Memory Speed2002 MHzvs1750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.1GB/secvs224GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs2048
Actual Shader Performance72%vs100%
Technology12nmvs14nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs128
Texture Rate83.2 GTexel/svs149.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate47.5 GPixel/svs37.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs2
DisplayPort Connections1vs2
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs195 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 27 Ampsvs500 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-8400 6-Core 2.8GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
The GeForce GTX 1650 is an Nvidia GeForce low-end graphics card which launched in April 2019. The GeForce GTX 1650 is designed to compete against AMD's more affordable gaming cards such as the RX 550 and the RX 560, and replaces the outgoing GTX 1050.
This is a daul-slot graphics card which connects to the rest of the system using a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Architecture
The Turing Architecture aims for 30-50% as much performance as the previous-gen Pascal Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Turing T107-400, more specifically a TU117-300-A1, which has 14 SM activated and thus 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1485 MHz and goes up to 1665 MHz with the Boost Clock.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 2000 MHz (8GHz effective).

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 will enable low to mid-level graphics performance on modern AAA 2019 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card has slightly faster performance than the GTX 1050 Ti.

System Suggestions
The GeForce GTX 1650 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 19200x1080 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-8400 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
Overview
First off we should point out that this is not the new AMD Vega graphics card line. These new AMD Radeon RX 500 series cards are an uprated version of the RX 400 series that they are replacing. This Sapphire RX 570 graphics card is one of the higher performance models from the new AMD Radeon RX 500 Series.

The AMD Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 8GB graphics card is a small form factor RX 570, released in April 2017 as an AMD performance gaming graphics card. This card competes against Nvidia's GTX 1050 Ti and replaces the older Radeon RX 470. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470.

Architecture
It is powered by the 14nm Pollaris 20 GPU, which has 2048 shader processing units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

GPU
The Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 processing central unit runs at 1168MHz and goes up to 1340MHz, when the boost mode is triggered. The reference RX 570 card's boost clock is 1244MHz

Memory
The Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 comes with a 8GB frame buffer of GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface, while the memory clock operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
The Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 has a rated board TDP of 195W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 8-pin connector.

Performance
The AMD RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB delivers a Mid/High graphical performance for 2017. with the RX570 capable of running most triple AAA titles released during 2017 on medium to high graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution. With some adjustments and lowering anti aliasing this RX570 8GB card can confidently maintain 60+ frames per seconds on high graphic settings at 1080p. Moving to 1440p screen resolution and the graphics card may need to be adjusted down to medium in order to maintain 50-60+ fps.

System Suggestions
The RX 570 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a mid range R5 Ryzen processor and at least 8GB of system memory for optimal gaming performance from the RX 570.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body