Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel UHD Graphics 630 FirePro V5800
Cyberpunk 2077 874% 735%
Call of Duty Warzone 609% 508%
Minecraft: Dungeons 648% 542%
Valorant 30% 40%
Grand Theft Auto VI 983% 829%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 874% 735%
Doom Eternal 622% 519%
Maneater 509% 423%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 582% 485%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 562% 468%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro V5800 are very slightly better than the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

The FirePro V5800 has a 350 MHz higher core clock speed and 17 more Texture Mapping Units than the UHD Graphics 630. This results in the FirePro V5800 providing 19.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The FirePro V5800 has a 350 MHz higher core clock speed and 13 more Render Output Units than the UHD Graphics 630. This results in the FirePro V5800 providing 10.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The UHD Graphics 630 was released over three years more recently than the FirePro V5800, and so the UHD Graphics 630 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the FirePro V5800 when running the latest games.

The FirePro V5800 has 1024 MB video memory, but the UHD Graphics 630 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The UHD Graphics 630 has 184 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro V5800 has 800. However, the actual shader performance of the UHD Graphics 630 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro V5800 is 364. The FirePro V5800 having 152 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro V5800 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the UHD Graphics 630.

The UHD Graphics 630 transistor size technology is 26 nm (nanometers) smaller than the FirePro V5800. This means that the UHD Graphics 630 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the FirePro V5800.

The UHD Graphics 630 requires 15 Watts to run and the FirePro V5800 requires 74 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the FirePro V5800, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the UHD Graphics 630. The FirePro V5800 requires 59 Watts more than the UHD Graphics 630 to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro V5800 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the UHD Graphics 630.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs700 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Evergreen Juniper XT GL
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Sep 2017vs26 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed-vs1000 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth-vs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units184vs800
Actual Shader Performance10%vs18%
Texture Mapping Units23vs40
Texture Rate8.1 GTexel/svs28 GTexel/s
Render Output Units3vs16
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs11.2 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power15 Wattsvs74 Watts
Recommended PSU-400 Watts & 27 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM-8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview Intel UHD Graphics 630 are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Coffee Lake Processors. Architecture The Coffee Lake Architecture succeeds the Kaby Lake Architecture and aims for increased CPU and Graphics Performance, within the same Power Requirements. It includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.1 and OpenGL 4.6, as well as DDR4 Memory Support. GPU The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1150MHz in Turbo Mode. The GPU Codenamed GT2 offers 184 Shader Processing Units, 23 TMUs and 3 ROPs Memory Speed The operating memory clock depends on which speed the System's RAM is running and which memory type is installed and is ultimately limited by the highest operating speed that the processor supports. Depending on whether or not the System's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit Memory Interface. Memory Frame Buffer The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies according to the System. The GPU may reserve up to 1.7GB.FirePro V5800 is a professional graphics card based on the 40nm Terascale 2 architecture.
It's based on the Juniper XT Core (same used on Radeon HD 6770) and therefore offers 800 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs on a 128-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 700MHz while the memory clock operates at 1000MHZ.
Compared to Radeon HD 6770, its central unit is underclocked and overall its gaming performance is even lower than Radeon HD 6770 because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the Terascale's architecture potential while FirePro W5800 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 7% and 10% worse than Radeon HD 6770.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants