Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB | GeForce GTX 770 Zotac AMP! Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8% | 41% |
Hitman 3 | 19% | 84% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 16% | 29% |
Resident Evil 8 | 8% | 41% |
FIFA 21 | 54% | 29% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 29% | 99% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 19% | 25% |
Genshin Impact | 8% | 41% |
The Medium | 14% | 76% |
Far Cry 6 | 32% | 105% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 Zotac AMP! Edition.
The RX 590 has a 319 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 770. This results in the RX 590 providing 64.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 590 has a 319 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 770 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the RX 590 providing 10.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 590 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 770, and so the RX 590 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 770 when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The RX 590 has 6144 MB more video memory than the GTX 770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the RX 590 also has superior memory performance overall.
The RX 590 has 26.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 770, which means that the memory performance of the RX 590 is slightly better than the GTX 770.
The Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB has 2304 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 Zotac AMP! Edition has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 590 is 3666 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 770 is 1846. The RX 590 having 1820 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 590 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 770.
The RX 590 transistor size technology is 16 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 770. This means that the RX 590 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 770.
The Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB requires 175 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 770 Zotac AMP! Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the RX 590 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 770. The GTX 770 has been recommended a PSU with 100 Watts more than the RX 590. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 590.
Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB gets 43.6 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB gets 65.4 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB gets 34 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB gets 16.6 FPS on Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB gets 21.2 FPS on Tom Clancys Ghost Recon Wildlands
Core Speed | 1469 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1150 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1591 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1202 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.3 Polaris 30 | Kepler GK104-425-A2 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 30 Oct 2018 | ![]() | vs | 30 Jun 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 8.9
|
|
2560x1440 | 8.7
|
![]() |
vs | 6.5
|
|
3840x2160 | 6.7
|
![]() |
vs | 4.8
|
Memory | 8192 MB | ![]() | vs | 2048 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 2008 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1800 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 257GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 230.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2304 | ![]() | vs | 1536 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 89% | |
Technology | 12nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 144 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 211.5 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 147.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 47 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 36.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 175 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 6.0 | ![]() | vs | 5.0 | |
Open GL | 4.6 | ![]() | vs | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-Core 3.6GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1440 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The new AMD Radeon RX 590 is an uprated version of the RX 580 on the smaller 12nm process node. The Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB is a mid-range Radeon RX 500 Series graphics card and considered great price to performance for gaming at 1080p. This RX 590 is the 8GB version. The Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB is a dual-slot video card with a dual fan 3-phase cooling solution, XXL aluminium heatsink, metal backplate, and 0dB silent cooling. Architecture It equips a GPU codenamed Polaris 30, which has 2304 shader processing units, 144 TMUs and 32 ROPs. GPU The RX 590 8GB central processing unit runs at 1469 MHz base clock and goes up to 1591 MHz when in boost and turbo mode, providing a small 3% overclock versus the reference model. Memory The GPU accesses a 8GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 2008MHz. Power Consumption The Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB has a power TDP requirement of 175W. This means it will require at least a 500W PSU with one dedicated 8-pin connector. Performance Benchmarks indicate that the AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB will be around 10-15% faster than the Nvidia GTX 1060 in terms of gaming performance, and around 6% faster than the Radeon RX 580 model it is replacing. System Suggestions The new Radeon RX 590 ASRock Phantom Gaming X OC 8GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1440, although is ideally suited for 1080p gaming. We recommend a high-end processor, like the new Ryzen R5 and at least 12GB of RAM for optimal gaming performance. | GeForce GTX 770 Zotac AMP! Edition is a special edition of GeForce GTX 770. This edition comes with a custom dual fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 770 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 1046MHz to 1150MHz while its boost clock is now of 1202MHz. The memory clock was increased to 1800MHz. Benchmarks indicate a 8% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this edition performs slightly better than GeForce GTX 590. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |