Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon RX 5600 6GB | GeForce GTX 780 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 22% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 1% | 69% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 29% | 19% |
Resident Evil 8 | 22% | 30% |
FIFA 21 | 61% | 34% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 10% | 83% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 31% | 15% |
Genshin Impact | 22% | 30% |
The Medium | 3% | 62% |
Far Cry 6 | 13% | 88% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 6GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780.
The RX 5600 has a 267 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 780, but the GeForce GTX 780 has 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 5600. As a result, the GeForce GTX 780 exhibits a 21.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 5600. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 5600 has a 267 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 780. This results in the RX 5600 providing 30.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 5600 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 780, and so the RX 5600 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 780 when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The RX 5600 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 780 has superior memory performance.
The GeForce GTX 780 has 0.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 5600, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is marginally better than the RX 5600.
The Radeon RX 5600 6GB has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 5600 is 2077 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 780 is 2078. The GeForce GTX 780 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the RX 5600 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The RX 5600 transistor size technology is 21 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 780. This means that the RX 5600 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 780.
The Radeon RX 5600 6GB requires 150 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780 requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the RX 5600 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GeForce GTX 780. The GeForce GTX 780 requires 100 Watts more than the RX 5600 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 780 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 5600.
Core Speed | 1130 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | ![]() | vs | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | Navi 10 XL | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 21 Jan 2020 | ![]() | vs | 23 May 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | 8.6
|
![]() |
vs | 6.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 6.3
|
![]() |
vs | 5.2
|
Memory | 6144 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 192 Bit | vs | ![]() | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | ![]() | vs | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 288GB/sec | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 288.4GB/sec |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2048 | vs | ![]() | 2304 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 7nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 128 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 144.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 72.3 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 150 Watts | ![]() | vs | 250 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 550 Watts & 42 Amps | ![]() | vs | 600 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The AMD Radeon RX 5600 6GB is an mid-tier gaming Graphics Card based on the first (1.0) Revision of the RDNA Architecture. Architecture The Navi 10 XL GPU offers support for GDDR6 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Vulkan 1.0, and OpenGL 4.5. GPU This variant of the Navi 10 XL GPU features 36 Compute Units activated, offering 2304 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The GPU features a 1375 MHz base clock speed and up to 1560 MHz with boost clock, making it an estimated 12% slower than a Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB. This puts its predicted performance at roughly the same as a GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with 6GB high-speed GDDR6 and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 192-bit memory interface, providing total memory bandwidth of 288 GB/s. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 6GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However,the GPU itself is aimed for 1080p Gaming. In some limited scenarios at 1440p resolution, 6GB video memory might be a bottleneck and Performance could be better were the Frame Buffer larger, however this would only be an issue in the most demanding games. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 150W, it requires at least a 550W PSU with one available 8+6-pin connector. Performance AMD Radeon RX 5600 6GB competes with GeForce GTX 1660 Super which is available for $329. System Suggestions AMD Radeon RX 5600 6GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2650 x 1480 but is ideally suited for 1920 x 1080. For the most demanding AAA games it should be ideally suited to 1080p. We recommend a mid-tier CPU and at least 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | GeForce GTX 780 is a high-end graphics-card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. It's based on the Kepler GK110 Core (same used on Titan) but with 12 SMX activated and therefore offers 2304 Shader Processing Units, 192 TMUs and 48 ROPs on a 384-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 863MHz and goes up to 902MHz in Turbo, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz. It consumes up to 250W. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is up to 30% better than previous GeForce GTX 680 and thus allows even the most demanding games to be playable at the highest settings, at 1080p. With proper overclocking and cooling, it can surpass GeForce GTX Titan. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - |