In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X 4GB.

The GTX 1650 has a 672 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M395X, but the R9 M395X has 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1650. As a result, the R9 M395X exhibits a 3.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1650. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 672 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M395X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 21.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over three years more recently than the R9 M395X, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the R9 M395X when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and the Radeon R9 M395X 4GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The R9 M395X has 96 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1650, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M395X is massively better than the GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile has 1024 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M395X 4GB has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1597 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M395X is 1259. The GTX 1650 having 338 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M395X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 16 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 M395X. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 M395X.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile requires 50 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M395X 4GB requires 125 Watts. The R9 M395X requires 75 Watts more than the GTX 1650 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M395X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1650.