Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game 655 GT3e GeForce 940MX 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 343% 495%
Hitman 3 476% 674%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 305% 444%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 292% 426%
FIFA 21 124% 200%
Grand Theft Auto VI 524% 737%
Far Cry 6 541% 761%
Genshin Impact 343% 495%
Battlefield 6 476% 674%
Resident Evil 8 343% 495%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 655 GT3e are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 822 MHz higher core clock speed but 24 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the 655 GT3e. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce 940MX 2GB manages to provide 12.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 822 MHz higher core clock speed and 5 more Render Output Units than the 655 GT3e. This results in the GeForce 940MX 2GB providing 8.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The 655 GT3e was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 940MX 2GB, and so the 655 GT3e is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 940MX 2GB when running the latest games.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the 655 GT3e does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the 655 GT3e and the GeForce 940MX 2GB have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 940MX 2GB is 644 and by the 655 GT3e is 644. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 940MX 2GB is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The 655 GT3e transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 940MX 2GB. This means that the 655 GT3e is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The 655 GT3e requires 28 Watts to run and the GeForce 940MX 2GB requires 25 Watts. The 655 GT3e requires 3 Watts more than the GeForce 940MX 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the 655 GT3e to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs1122 MHz
Boost Clock1200 MHzvs1242 MHz
ArchitectureKaby LakeMaxwell GM108-N16S-GTR
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date01 Jun 2019vs01 Mar 2016
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.6
green tick vs
7.4
1600x900
6.1
green tick vs
5.7
1920x1080
5.1
green tick vs
4.2
2560x1440
3.1
green tick vs
2.8
3840x2160
2.2
green tick vs
1.9

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed-vs1001 MHz
Memory Bus-vs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs16GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance22%vs31%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs24
Texture Rate14.4 GTexel/svs26.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units3vs8
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i5-6300HQ 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GT3e are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Kaby Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel i7-8559U, i5-8269U, i5-8259U, i3-8109U

Architecture
The Kaby Lake architecture succeeds the Skylake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance, via the same power requirements. It includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.1 and OpenGL 4.6.
GPU
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1200MHz, in turbo mode in the Intel i7-8559U.

Performance
Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary heavily from System to System.
Best case scenario, expect performance similar to the AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.
Overview
GeForce 940MX 2GB is a Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the Maxwell Architecture.

Architecture
GeForce 940MX 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed GM108-N16S-GTR which is a First Gen Maxwell GPU and is identical to the GM108-N16S-GT-S used on GeForce 940M but with the addition of GDDR5 Support.
GM108-N16S-GTR has 3 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 1122Hz and goes up to 1242MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 64-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1001MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small and medium sized laptops.

Performance
Equipped with DDR3, GeForce GT 940MX is only slightly faster than GeForce GT 940M.

System Suggestions
GeForce 940MX 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We Recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-