Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game G1 1050MHz GeForce 940MX 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 391% 495%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 349% 444%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 335% 426%
Grand Theft Auto VI 591% 737%
FIFA 21 148% 200%
Genshin Impact 391% 495%
Far Cry 6 611% 761%
Hitman 3 539% 674%
Watch Dogs Legion 374% 474%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 604% 753%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel G1 1050MHz are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 822 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the G1 1050MHz. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce 940MX 2GB manages to provide 17.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has a 822 MHz higher core clock speed and 5 more Render Output Units than the G1 1050MHz. This results in the GeForce 940MX 2GB providing 8.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The G1 1050MHz was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 940MX 2GB, and so the G1 1050MHz is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 940MX 2GB when running the latest games.

The GeForce 940MX 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the G1 1050MHz does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The G1 1050MHz has 256 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 940MX 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the G1 1050MHz is 269 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 940MX 2GB is 644. The GeForce 940MX 2GB having 375 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 940MX 2GB delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the G1 1050MHz.

The G1 1050MHz transistor size technology is 18 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 940MX 2GB. This means that the G1 1050MHz is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

The G1 1050MHz requires 28 Watts to run and the GeForce 940MX 2GB requires 25 Watts. The G1 1050MHz requires 3 Watts more than the GeForce 940MX 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the G1 1050MHz to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 940MX 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs1122 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs1242 MHz
ArchitectureIce LakeMaxwell GM108-N16S-GTR
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date28 May 2019vs01 Mar 2016
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs green tick
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed-vs1001 MHz
Memory Bus-vs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs16GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units256vs384
Actual Shader Performance13%vs31%
Texture Mapping Units32vs24
Texture Rate9.6 GTexel/svs26.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units3vs8
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs9 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power28 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model6.4vs5.0
Open GL4.6vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i5-6300HQ 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 1050MHz are integrated graphics in some of Intel's Ice Lake mobile processors. It can be found in Intel Core i5-1035G1 & Intel Core i5-1034G1

The Ice Lake architecture succeeds the Kaby lake architecture and aims for increased CPU and graphics performance.
New Features
These Gen 11 graphics solutions include the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. This lets shading time for object shading in game to be allocated more accurately by the game's developers. So for example, a graphics depicting an object that cannot easily be seen can be marked as not needing such high performance and visual accuracy and thus save processing power. GPU
The central unit initially runs at 300MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in turbo mode.

Because performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary from system to system.
Best case scenario, expect Intel Iris Plus Graphics G1 1050MHz performance to be not as powerful as the older Iris Plus 640 onboard solution, which will reduce potential AAA gaming chances moving forward. We dont recommend this onboard solution for modern gaming.
GeForce 940MX 2GB is a Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the Maxwell Architecture.

GeForce 940MX 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed GM108-N16S-GTR which is a First Gen Maxwell GPU and is identical to the GM108-N16S-GT-S used on GeForce 940M but with the addition of GDDR5 Support.
GM108-N16S-GTR has 3 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs.

The Central Unit is Clocked at 1122Hz and goes up to 1242MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 64-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1001MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small and medium sized laptops.

Equipped with DDR3, GeForce GT 940MX is only slightly faster than GeForce GT 940M.

System Suggestions
GeForce 940MX 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We Recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants