Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 465 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 257% | 265% |
Hitman 3 | 365% | 374% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 227% | 233% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 216% | 223% |
FIFA 21 | 80% | 84% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 403% | 413% |
Far Cry 6 | 417% | 427% |
Genshin Impact | 257% | 265% |
Battlefield 6 | 365% | 374% |
Resident Evil 8 | 257% | 265% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FireStream 9370 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 465.
The FireStream 9370 was released less than a year after the GeForce GTX 465, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The FireStream 9370 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 465, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FireStream 9370 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FireStream 9370 has 50.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 465, which means that the memory performance of the FireStream 9370 is much better than the GeForce GTX 465.
The FireStream 9370 has 1600 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 465 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the FireStream 9370 is 858 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 465 is 427. The FireStream 9370 having 431 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FireStream 9370 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 465.
The FireStream 9370 requires 225 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 465 requires 200 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 465, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FireStream 9370. The FireStream 9370 requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 465 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the FireStream 9370 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GTX 465.
Core Speed | 825 MHz | ![]() | vs | 607 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | RV870 | Fermi GF100-030-A3 | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Poor | ||
Release Date | 23 Jun 2010 | ![]() | vs | 01 May 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.4
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
7.2
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.5
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
3.6
|
|
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1200 MHz | ![]() | vs | 802 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 153.6GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 102.7GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | - | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1600 | ![]() | vs | 352 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 41% | ![]() | vs | 21% | |
Technology | - | vs | ![]() | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | - | vs | ![]() | 44 | |
Texture Rate | - | vs | ![]() | 26.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | - | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | - | vs | ![]() | 19.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 225 Watts | vs | ![]() | 200 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 550 Watts & 30 Amps |
DirectX | 11 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.0 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | Intel Core i5-760 2.8GHz | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | 8 GB | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | The FireStream 9370 offers maximum GPU performance with 4GB of DDR5 memory in a 2-slot configuration. The FireStream 9350 offers maximum performance / slot with 2GB DDR5 memory in a 1-slot configuration. Both boards are passively cooled and include a single Display Port output. (For workstation installations that require active cooling of the GPU, AMD’s ATI FirePro™ professional graphics boards are software compatible and offer comparable features.) | GeForce GTX 465 is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Fermi architecture. It's based on the Fermi GF100 Core (optimized GF104 Core) and offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 42 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 607MHz and the memory clock operates at 802MHz. Despite feature more Shader Processing Units than GeForce GTX 460, it's lower clocked. Benchmarks indicate that its performance is around 3% better than the standard version and therefore on level with GeForce GTX 460 v2. Most modern demanding games will run at the highest settings using a 1080p resolution. However, some will require reduced settings to be played optimally. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - |