Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 3 Ti 200 Radeon Xpress 1200 Series
Red Dead Redemption 2 7033% 35567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7033% 35567%
Zombieland: Double Tap - Road Trip 6567% 33233%
Cyberpunk 2077 9700% 48900%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 9700% 48900%
Borderlands 3 7433% 37567%
The Outer Worlds 6433% 32567%
FIFA 20 3700% 18900%
Fortnite: Chapter 2 3167% 16233%
eFootball PES 2020 4767% 24233%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 200 are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The Xpress 1200 was released over three years more recently than the 3 Ti, and so the Xpress 1200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 3 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 3 Ti has 64 MB video memory, but the Xpress 1200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the GeForce 3 Ti 200 and the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

GPU Architecture

Core Speed175 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV20RS690C
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2001vs28 Feb 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs-
Memory Speed200 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0b
Shader Model1.1vs3.0
Open GL1.3vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce 3 Ti 200 is a very old GPU part of the GeForce 3 Series released by NVIDIA in 2001.
It only supports DirectX up to 8.1 so even DirectX 9 games are most likely unplayable.
That being said, the 64MB video memory and very low core clock doom its performance from the start. Therefore, almost all today's games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
ATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body

Ads

or, become Premium, be ad free + get access to all GD’s extra features

Here’s one for everyone. We remove ads for 24hrs if you visit the link below. You don’t need to buy anything there, just follow the link and be ad free.