Titan_X_Pascal_2016
Nvidia Titan X Pascal 2016

GD Rating

10

How well can the Titan X Pascal 2016 run games
A true powerhouse, the Titan X Pascal 2016 will run even the most demanding game system requirements released today.

Titan X Pascal 2016 is capable of DirectX 12 gaming requirements.

The powerful Nvidia Titan X Pascal 2016 meets all the system requirements of the most demanding games released today.

How many years will the Titan X Pascal 2016 graphics card play newly released games and how long until you should consider upgrading the Titan X Pascal 2016 in your PC? This gaming graphics card is not going to need to be replaced for at least 3+ years in any modern gamers PC. Making the Titan X Pascal 2016 one of the top choices for gaming PC graphics cards.

FPS System Benchmark
200+ FPS
High
The Titan X Pascal 2016 is released on the 02 Aug 2016
Nvidia PC game performance check Titan X Pascal 2016
GPU
Architecture
Pascal GP102
Process
16nm
TMUs
224
Texture Rate
343 GTexel/s
ROPs
96
Pixel Rate
147 GPixel/s
Shader
Processing Units (Cuda Cores)
3584
Ray Tracing Cores
Tensor Cores
-
Driver Support
-
Release Price
$1199.00
Compatibility
Direct X
DX 12
Shader
5
Open GL
4.5
Resolution (WxH)
7680x4320
Notebook GPU
SLI/Crossfire
Dedicated
Integrated
Memory
Memory Speed
1250 MHz
Memory Bus
384 Bit
Memory Type
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
480GB/sec
L2 Cache
3072KB
Display Connectors
VGA Connection
0
DVI Connection
1
HDMI Connection
1
DisplayPort Connection
3
Clock Speeds
Core Speed
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
Power
Max Power
250 Watts
PSU
600 Watt & 60 Amps
Power Connector
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Recommended Hardware
Best RAM Match
16 GB
Best Resolution
3840 x 2160
GPU Upgrade
Resolution Performance
1366x768 1600x900 1920x1080 2560x1440 3840x2160
10
10
10
10
7.8
Titan X Pascal 2016 Game Requirement Analysis

The Titan X 2016 uses Pascal architecture and is the latest in Nvidia's top extreme performance Titan graphics card range.
Set to retail at $1200 upon its release on 2nd August 2016. It was originally thought to be called Titan P, but instead almost repeated the naming convention of the older Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X. However this card is simply called Nvidia Titan X and some refer to it as Titan X Pascal.
This is now Nvidia's flagship graphics card and expects to be the most powerful dedicated gaming GPU currently available.


Source [Felix]
Titan X Pascal 2016 vs Avg. AAA Game System Requirements
Avg. AAA Recommended Requirements
CPU
0%
Graphics Card
50%
RAM
11GB
0%
VS
VS
Popular Game System Requirements
Game Min. Rec.
Titan X Pascal 2016 Extras
View Compatible Hardware PC Builder
Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion
View all discussions
X
Formatting Syntax Result
Bold **bold text** __more bold text__ bold text more bold text
Italic *italic text* _more italic text_ italic text more italic text
Strikethrough ~~strikethrough text~~ strikethrough text
Links [Game-Debate](https://www.game-debate.com) Game-Debate
Ordered List Press return twice to start your list

1. List item the first
2. List item the second
3. List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  1. List item the first
  2. List item the second
  3. List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Unordered Lists Press return twice to start your list

* List item the first
* List item the second
* List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  • List item the first
  • List item the second
  • List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Code Blocks `alert('hello world!');` alert('hello world!');
Quote Blocks > 'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
Formatting Help
New - Ordered by date, the newest comments at the top
1 2 3 4
0
iiMayo's Rig
Saved at: Jun-30-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
3

6% better :)

0
Anees12's Rig
Saved at: Jul-25-2018
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 3200MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
3

lol 988% worse

1
mshadabalam's Rig
Saved at: Apr-03-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
12GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1440 x 900
width x height
1
0
/
-1

573% worse :D hahahaha in next 5 years my card would me 1 million % worse

0
Narayananm1998's Rig
Saved at: Sep-07-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
0

Mine is 988% worse. So after five years mine would be 10 million% worse

0
prorab2's Rig
Saved at: Mar-29-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR4 2400MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
2

214% worse only. Deal with it XD

0
ItsHerman12's Rig
Saved at: Jun-12-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
64GB DDR4 3600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
11520 x 2200
width x height
1
0
/
1

673% worse. Nice

0
Ninobass92's Rig
Saved at: Apr-14-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR4 2133MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
0

Only 67% worse… i can with that with my 350$ card :)

0
assassin102's Rig
Saved at: Apr-18-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
2560 x 1440
width x height
1
7
/
88

Only 172% worse for me.

1
AjrAlves's Rig
Saved at: Dec-17-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1866MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1600 x 900
width x height
1
0
/
9

Why GD is saying it is dual GPU in the specs?(and 192-bit, WTF?)

0
RobinClarijs's Rig
Saved at: Apr-10-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
49

They just messed up in the specification sheet and don't seem to update it anymore. I've asked to change it since august 2nd, nothing has been done since then. But yeah as it is now it's wrong.

0
ricerocketlondon1's Rig
Saved at: Sep-23-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
8

I want

4
Visupoint's Test Rig
Saved at: Apr-21-2018
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
4GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1366 x 768
width x height
1
test rig
0
/
22

Memory bus: 384bit
12GB of GDDR5X, not 6
And just write 3584 cuda cores? :D

0
Compuser101's Rig
Saved at: Apr-14-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2800MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
14

I'm looking forward for you to update the specs and performance of this gpu…

1
RageandFury's Rig
Saved at: Aug-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
64GB DDR4 3200MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
1
0
/
-2

How the hell is a 15% OC Fury X crossfire setup worse than this? :o
Check the benchmarks and fix the performance, Game Debate.

0
aditrex's Rig
Saved at: Apr-14-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR4 2800MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
355

amd high end cards tend to be underated here in GD

0
Chuske's Rig
Saved at: Nov-25-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
28

Basically you have Radeon Pro duo (2xFuryX) .. and Radeon Pro Duo is on par with GTX 1080 in performance .. so even OCed it cant reach TITAN XP .. and on GD Titan XP is just 14% better than GTX 1080 .. but the truth is, its about 25-30% better than GTX 1080 .. so even OCed Pro Duo will be about 10-15% slower than TITAN X on stock :)

1
RageandFury's Rig
Saved at: Aug-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
64GB DDR4 3200MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
1
0
/
-2

Wrong. A Pro Duo is essentially CF'd Nanos, as it has a default clock speed of 1000/500 with significant downclocking under load to match its TDP.

0
RageandFury's Rig
Saved at: Aug-08-2017
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
64GB DDR4 3200MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
3840 x 2160
width x height
1
0
/
-2

Besides, RX 480 CF is more comparable to a GTX 1080, look at the Fire Strike and Time Spy results.

0
RobinClarijs's Rig
Saved at: Apr-10-2019
Compared to your Rig
CPU
Login to compare your CPU
GFX
Login to compare your GFX Card
RAM
16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Login to compare your RAM
RES
1920 x 1080
width x height
1
0
/
49

uuuh no…

1 2 3 4

Title

Body