Celeron_N3050_1.6GHz_
Intel Celeron N3050 1.6GHz

GD Rating

0
Check Prices
How well can the Celeron N3050 1.6GHz run games
Celeron N3050 1.6GHz Performance Specification
CPU Speed
Turbo Speed
Physical Cores
Threads
CPU Codename
TDP (Power)
Lithography
Mobo Socket
Main Link
Bit Width
Max Temp.
Memory Channels
Maximum memory
Processor GPU
CPU Details
1.6 GHz
2.16 GHz
2 cores
2 threads
Braswell
6W
14nm
BGA
64 Bit
90°C
2
8GB
None
Celeron N3050 1.6GHz Game Requirement Analysis

The Celeron brand has been used by Intel for several distinct ranges of x86 CPUs targeted at budget personal computers. Celeron processors can run all IA-32 computer programs, but their performance is somewhat lower when compared to similar CPUs with higher-priced Intel CPU brands. For example, the Celeron brand will often have less cache memory, or have advanced features purposely disabled. These missing features have had a variable impact on performance. In some cases, the effect was significant and in other cases the differences were relatively minor. Many of the Celeron designs have achieved a very high bang for the buck, while at other times, the performance difference has been noticeable. This has been the primary justification for the higher cost of other Intel CPU brands versus the Celeron range.


Source [Wikipedia]
Release period
30-Mar-2015
Celeron N3050 1.6GHz vs Avg. AAA Game System Requirements
Avg. AAA Recommended Requirements
CPU
760%
Graphics Card
0%
RAM
11GB
0%
VS
VS
Popular Game System Requirements
Game Min. Rec.
Red Dead Redemption 2 436% 805%
Death Stranding 571% 885%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 379% 571%
Cyberpunk 2077 571% 669%
Need For Speed Heat 495% 665%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 311% 900%
Planet Zoo 495% 805%
Diablo 4 544% 839%
Borderlands 3 620% 805%
FIFA 20 275% 548%
Celeron N3050 1.6GHz Extras
PC Builder
Discussion Area
The discussion area is the place where you get to chat with fellow gamers and techies.
You need to be logged in and have a GD rank of 2 or higher to join the discussion
View all discussions
X
Formatting Syntax Result
Bold **bold text** __more bold text__ bold text more bold text
Italic *italic text* _more italic text_ italic text more italic text
Strikethrough ~~strikethrough text~~ strikethrough text
Links [Game-Debate](https://www.game-debate.com) Game-Debate
Ordered List Press return twice to start your list

1. List item the first
2. List item the second
3. List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  1. List item the first
  2. List item the second
  3. List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Unordered Lists Press return twice to start your list

* List item the first
* List item the second
* List item the third

Press return twice to finish your list
Press return twice to start your list
  • List item the first
  • List item the second
  • List item the third
Press return twice to finish your list
Code Blocks `alert('hello world!');` alert('hello world!');
Quote Blocks > 'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
'Tis better to have visited Game-Debate than to never have visited Game-Debate
Formatting Help
New - Ordered by date, the newest comments at the top
1
0
PC Specs

CPU

Your CPU CPU Comparison
2016
Check Prices
$199.99
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

16 GB

0
0
/
12

Not a bad CPU. With its integrated Buddy (Intel HD Graphics Braswell). It could run games (2006-2010) on low-medium possibly high.
I ran LoL on mid settings (30-60 fps) @ 1366x768
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim on low settings (15-35 fps) @ 1280x720
COD: WaW on low settings (15-40 fps) @ 640x420

0
PC Specs

CPU (45% overclock)

Your CPU CPU Comparison

GPU

0
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

8 GB

0
0
/
16

My aunt has this CPU inside a little desktop tower and it is hooked to a 16 or 19 inch HD TV via a HDMI cable. She never experienced problems with it so far.

-3
PC Specs

CPU (15% overclock)

2015
Check Prices
$350.00
Your CPU CPU Comparison

GPU

0
2017
Check Prices
$699.00
Your GPU GPU Comparison

RAM

16 GB

0
0
/
2

Steer way WAY clear of this piece of garbage. It struggles at running a 720p YouTube video. Heed my warning. I tested Minecraft (with Optifine installed I might add) and lag city is where I ended up. Now, Minecraft can be a hit or miss with these low budget netbooks so I shrugged that off and tried another easy to run game, Terraria. Y'know, because I thought a CPU from early 2015 would be able to run a goddamn 2D platformer. Man was I wrong… If you see this CPU. STAY AWAY!

1

Title

Body