COD Advanced Warfare System Requirements Glimpsed

Written by Felix Nova on Sat, Aug 9, 2014 9:00 AM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

Annual COD! Its that time of the year, when the massive budget gaming releases are fast coming into view. Whether you like COD or not, the franchise sells well for Activision and you can bet your bottom dollar that they will keep producing an annual COD if people keep buying it. And they do. Apparently Ghosts sold 14.5 million copies.

Advanced Warfare looks like it took some serious inspiration from Neill Blomkamp's Elysium, as you get to run around in a super fancy muscle enhancing exo-skeleton. Well we have caught a brief glimpse of the COD Advanced Warfare system requirements and if you want to run Call of Duty Advanced Warfare on your PC, assuming the optimisation of Advanced Warfare is solid, then you are going to need a reasonable modern rig.

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare Minimum System Requirements

  • OS: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66 Ghz OR AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4 Ghz or better
  • RAM: 6GB of System Memory
  • GPU RAM: 1 GB Graphics Memory
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX GTS 450 OR ATI Radeon HD 5870
  • HD: 40GB
  • DX: DirectX 11
  • Net: Broadband connection and service required for Multiplayer Connectivity. Internet connection required for activation

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare Recommended System Requirements

  • CPU: Intel Core i5-680 @3.6GHz or similar AMD CPU
  • RAM: 8GB of System Memory
  • GPU RAM: 4 GB Graphics Memory
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

An important point of note is that these requirements were since removed from the official site where we spotted them. This could mean one of a couple of things. Firstly, these requirements are just a copy of the COD Ghosts requirements and could have been accidentally copied to the Activision site, as they templated the new advanced warfare webpage from the similar Ghosts page. OR they are just the early guess requirements, based entirely on COD Ghosts requirements but are pending the technical teams confirmation of accuracy and so were pulled until that happens. Or they are in fact the accurate COD Advanced Warfare requirements but because they have not officially announced the requirements yet via a press release they had to be pulled until the marketing is in place to capitalise on the announcement.

All that is left on the official website at the moment is confirmation of the operating system (win 7 or 8 64bit) and its Direct X requirement (DX 11). You can check out how well your PC can run COD Advanced Warfare System Requirements here. And you can also check out Frames Per Second results and performance from other users once they get their hands on it. Compare your graphics card to the Advanced Warfare benchmark charts.

Finally, let us know what your thoughts are about these requirements. Do they smell like rumour, are they just wrong or are they official advanced warfare system requirements? They are identical to Ghosts at this stage, so we feel like they are going to shift a little bit as the final optimisations are made by the development team on this final road to release. While it reportedly uses a new game engine to its predecessor, Ghosts also claimed to sport a new game engine and we were promised great things from Ghosts engine, which turned out not to be a new engine (next gen and all that) and it left us largely unimpressed. But Ghosts was still calling for a pretty powerful PC to play smoothly and the optimisation left something to be desired. Well we only have until the beginning of this November 2014, before we can see what special stuff this version of COD has in store for us.

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
-9
Offline
14:24 Aug-16-2014

settings for me

0
Rep
944
Offline
15:36 Aug-16-2014

Max if they really does not need a 4 GB card :)

0
Rep
12
Offline
16:23 Aug-11-2014

Gonna need a second card for SLI

0
Rep
944
Offline
17:12 Aug-11-2014

Concentrate on ur Ram as well mate :)

0
Rep
180
Offline
admin approved badge
08:24 Aug-11-2014

these requirements are making me loose faith in developers and the future of pc gaming. Developers are becoming stupid with requirements and although there will always be a future in pc games, i think bs like this will make people jump ship. R.I.P master race.

0
Rep
944
Offline
17:14 Aug-11-2014

Stupid ? they r making us stupid i guess....by giving old good graphics as the name of next gen graphics.

0
Rep
12
Offline
03:24 Aug-11-2014

is this the final min spec?

0
Rep
7
Offline
17:54 Aug-10-2014

Activision came out saying that these aren't final and are from last year, they will provide final specs after optimization.

1
Rep
12
Offline
10:50 Aug-10-2014

a big problem for me !!!

0
Rep
10
Offline
09:26 Aug-10-2014

System Requirements are becoming a big joke for PC gamers right in the face, uugh, what are these developers upto?

0
Rep
944
Offline
09:30 Aug-10-2014

Companies r forcing PC gamers to buy more than 1TB HDD force fully trying to backdate powerful GPU like GTX 660 670 680 690 HD 7870 7950 7970....CPU's like 3450 3470 3570 3570k 3770k FX 6300 FX 6350....this CPU and GPU's r more than enough for next gen games which r old wine in a new bottle.

0
Rep
359
Offline
admin approved badge
08:47 Aug-10-2014

Same gimmick as COD ghosts requiring 6GB min RAM.But it turned out that 4GB could play it fine....
I will just play as it is..!!
4GB gfx LOL

1
Rep
944
Offline
09:17 Aug-10-2014

I guess we both can play at high at least :)

0
Rep
70
Offline
16:22 Aug-10-2014

It has the same requirements as Ghost did :/ Or at least acording to Nvidia website :D

0
Rep
6
Offline
03:47 Aug-10-2014

It's call of duty , so why does anyone care ? The game will most likely be a unoptimized mess akin to ghosts and the gameplay looks like the typical rubbish , anyone with common sense will avoid this.

-4
Rep
6
Offline
17:48 Nov-05-2014

I have to say, I take all of that back. The game looks fantastic, a good return to form. They fixed the majority of the prominent problems in cod and optimized it well to boot. I can't wait to see what sledgehammer do next. They've just gone and made treyarch look like amateurs.

0
Rep
4
Offline
01:51 Aug-10-2014

40gb space yay less the cod ghost lol

0
Rep
0
Offline
00:13 Aug-10-2014

Who cares!

0
Rep
92
Offline
19:27 Aug-09-2014

If these are the actual requirements for the game, then I will once again be skipping this years CoD. I get that games are becoming more advanced and need higher specs, but 4 gigs of VRAM for 1080p? Even Metro has lower requirements.

0
Rep
229
Offline
18:44 Aug-09-2014

i hope it will be better optimized than ghosts especially mp,i still cant play it because of the stuttering

2
Rep
15
Offline
22:22 Aug-09-2014

what makes me not believe you?

0
Rep
229
Offline
23:50 Aug-09-2014

well you seriously should believe me ;)

1
Rep
18
Offline
10:27 Aug-10-2014

I believe you

0
Rep
229
Offline
14:13 Aug-11-2014

thanks for believing me bro ;)

0
Rep
405
Offline
admin approved badge
07:09 Aug-10-2014

I managed to play it just fine on my laptop...i guess that my rig is better than yours, you should consider an upgrade :D

0
Rep
229
Offline
14:14 Aug-11-2014

i know :(

0
Rep
944
Offline
18:44 Aug-09-2014

4 GB Vram needed on which res ? 720p 1080p 4k ??????????? or what ??????????? and for minimum a GTS 450 is equivalent with HD 5870 ? devs must be gone mad....or its a fake specs i guess....

0
Rep
23
Offline
17:30 Aug-09-2014

Come, Have a look at our latest game's system requirement, so that you'll get excited about the new engine that we copy-pasted from last engine and changed the name,
Sincerely
EA,
And if u preorder now you'll get to play SP missions that we were going to include in main game but'll soon release as DLC so that our company can make more bucks - 59.99$

0
Rep
405
Offline
admin approved badge
21:53 Aug-09-2014

And how the hell is EA involved with CoD?

0
Rep
94
Offline
16:37 Aug-09-2014

Worse optimalisation. where is the optimalisation like in MW3? It has slightly better graphics than MW2 and ran at the same FPS (25-40) on my Intel HD 1000 (i3-350M) at med settings 768p

-1
Rep
157
Offline
admin approved badge
17:02 Aug-09-2014

I don't think you would want to play this game. You always bash it.

2
Rep
94
Offline
17:47 Aug-10-2014

Nope, I don't like cod, exept cod mw2.

0
Rep
405
Offline
admin approved badge
21:51 Aug-09-2014

optimization*

2
Rep
303
Offline
admin approved badge
16:33 Aug-09-2014

40 GB huh, time for another HDD then

0
Rep
104
Offline
admin approved badge
16:11 Aug-09-2014

I uh... I can't believe I'm saying this, but... uh... I'm actually looking forward to this game.

1
Rep
55
Offline
admin approved badge
15:50 Aug-09-2014

Any chance for my ageing rig?

0
Rep
131
Offline
15:56 Aug-09-2014

all low at your res

0
Rep
285
Offline
admin approved badge
15:59 Aug-09-2014

Wow, thats one hell of a bottleneck.

0
Rep
94
Offline
17:49 Aug-10-2014

How about those Intel only laptops? Acer Aspire 5741 (mine) Intel Core i3-350M (beast for 2010) and Intel HD 1000 (can't even run minesweeper at 60 fps)

1
Rep
131
Offline
16:05 Aug-09-2014

huh?

0
Rep
285
Offline
admin approved badge
16:07 Aug-09-2014

not you foreverZ3RO

0
Rep
131
Offline
16:08 Aug-09-2014

what bottleneck? there's no bottleneck

0
Rep
285
Offline
admin approved badge
16:10 Aug-09-2014

his gpu

0
Rep
131
Offline
16:18 Aug-09-2014

its not a bottleneck
you see, i7 is equal to desktop i3, 650m is equal to desktop gts 450

0
Rep
285
Offline
admin approved badge
16:24 Aug-09-2014

i think the gts 450 is a bit better in terms of memory

0
Rep
405
Offline
admin approved badge
21:55 Aug-09-2014

His mobile i7 is noticeably better than any desktop i3, it's in the same level with quite high end desktop i5s.

0
Rep
131
Offline
16:29 Aug-09-2014

well its equal in terms of fps

0
Rep
285
Offline
admin approved badge
16:31 Aug-09-2014

isn't his CPU way better then his gpu

1
Rep
55
Offline
admin approved badge
17:10 Aug-09-2014

Actually the i7 Turbos to 3.2 during gaming. So it's much better than an i3. Yes, the i7 is much better than the GPU.

1
Rep
55
Offline
admin approved badge
17:12 Aug-09-2014

Also, the GPU is 2GB DDR5. This setup can still play every game to date, although some games have to run on low @1080 or medium @720.

1
Rep
157
Offline
admin approved badge
15:50 Aug-09-2014

I am sure i can play this on Very High if not on Ultra.

1

Can They Run... |

| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 5 4600H 6-Core 3.0GHz GeForce GTX 1650 16GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core 3.7GHz GeForce RTX 3070 Gigabyte Eagle OC 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
Ryzen 5 2600X 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB 16GB
Core i7-7700K 4-Core 4.2GHz GeForce GTX 970 EVGA SSC ACX 2.0 4GB Edition 32GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-9400 6-Core 2.9GHz GeForce RTX 2060 Super Palit Dual 8GB 16GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-4690 3.5GHz GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA SC Ultra Gaming 4GB 16GB
0% No [2 votes]
Core i5-4690 3.5GHz GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA SC Ultra Gaming 4GB 16GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 30FPS, Low, 720p
Core i7-4702MQ 4-Core 2.2GHz GeForce GT 750M 8GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-2600 4-Core 3.40GHz Radeon RX 580 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i5-7300HQ 4-Core 2.5GHz GeForce GTX 1050 16GB
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i5-7300HQ 4-Core 2.5GHz GeForce GTX 1050 16GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 720p
Ryzen R5 1600 Radeon RX 580 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
Core i5-9500 6-Core 3.0GHz UHD Graphics 630 8GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i5-4670 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1650 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600H 6-Core 3.3GHz GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 8GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core 3.8GHz GeForce RTX 3070 Asus Dual OC 8GB 16GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 30FPS, Medium, 720p
FX-8350 Radeon R9 380 8GB
| 60FPS, High, 1440p
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.6GHz Radeon RX 6750 XT 32GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-8750H 6-Core 2.2GHz GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5X 16GB