Titanfall 2 System Requirements Show A GeForce GTX 1080 Can Run It At 4K, 60 FPS

Written by Jon Sutton on Fri, Sep 23, 2016 9:52 AM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

EA may be sending it out on some sort of suicide mission just a week after Battlefield 1 arrives, but Titanfall 2 is going to be an undeniably huge event in the world of online shooters. Sandwiched in between BF and COD, Titanfall 2 looks to be the slickest of the bunch. Along with the multiplayer we already know was awesome last time around, we're also being treated to a full single-player campaign that's one man and his robot dog. Be prepared to titanfall with the official Titanfall 2 system requirements.

Titanfall 2 Minimum System Requirements

  • OS: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel Core i3-4130T 2.9 GHz or AMD FX-4200 3.3 GHz
  • RAM: 8 GB System Memory
  • VRAM: 2 GB Video Memory
  • GPU: GeForce GTX 660 or AMD Radeon HD 7850
  • DX: DirectX 11
  • HDD: 45GB available storage space

Titanfall 2 Recommended System Requirements

  • OS: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel Core i5-6600 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8370 4.1 GHz
  • RAM: 16 GB System Memory
  • VRAM: 6 GB Video Memory
  • GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB
  • DX: DirectX 11
  • HDD: 45GB available storage space

Titanfall 2 Ultra System Requirements

  • OS: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K 4.0 GHz or AMD FX-9370 4.4 GHz
  • RAM: 16 GB System Memory
  • VRAM: 8 GB Video Memory
  • GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 or AMD Radeon Pro Duo 8GB
  • DX: DirectX 11
  • HDD: 45GB available storage space

Okay, so there's an absolutely huge range to the Titanfall 2 system requirements, so let's run over what they each mean.

Beginning with the minimum, these are actually quite low by today's standards for a AAA title, although they are quite a bit in excess of the original Titanfall's recommended requirements. Respawn has touted an intel Core i3-3600T or equivalent as the minimum, a CPU which doesn't even exist. We've taken a stab at the Intel Core i3-4130T and the AMD FX-4200 but these two are very much guesses at this stage. 

When it comes to the minimum, Respawn has said this is definitely not the literal minimum specs with which you can run Titanfall 2. Instead, this is what you'll need to play 1600 x 900 resolution at 60 FPS with nearly all of the graphics settings turned on. So if you want to put up with a lower frame rate or worse graphics you can probably get away with going a generation or two older than the GTX 600 or Radeon HD 7000 series.

The jump up to recommended Titanfall 2 system requirements is a dramatic one, but this is for those who want to max the game out and play at 1080p / 60 FPS. Respawn even say this spec is also very good at 1440p. That's a very decently specced rig by today's standards, so if you can't quite hit that then there promises to be a lot of individual graphics options to squeeze out a few more frames at higher resolution.

Lastly there's the Ultra requirements. While at first glance they're liable to make your eyes pop out, this is in fact the hardware you will need to play Titanfall 2 at 4K resolution, Ultra graphics and 60 frames per second. Pretty much the ultimate experience but it requires a very powerful PC equipped with the latest GTX 1080 or AMD Radeon Pro Duo graphics cards and high-end CPUs.

Remember, you can always check out how well your PC can run the Titanfall 2 System Requirements here, where you can check benchmarking and performance from other users. Compare your graphics card to the Titanfall 2 benchmark chart.

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
0
Offline
23:01 Sep-26-2016

hahahahaha, it's so fun, amd pro duo is 20-30% better than gtx 1080 in most dx11 games, in dx12 will be more, this is strange, if for ultra is amd pro duo, for NVidia gpus have to be titan x pascal

-2
Rep
33
Offline
00:07 Sep-27-2016

May be that it is better optimised for nVidia cards.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
02:24 Sep-27-2016

fury x is around 1070 performance. the pro duo is slightly underclocked compared to fury x (fury nano speed). the shader performance between pro duo and 1080 is pretty close. also have to remember that the pro duo is a dual gpu card and the system sees it as such. scaling wont be 100% between the two gpus so in reality its even closer to 1080 performance.

1
Rep
3
Offline
15:39 Sep-26-2016

i bet you can run the game on ultra. high with older card, the new one is still fresh and new so the dev figure it out just yet

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
02:28 Sep-27-2016

the ultra requirements are for 4k/60/ultra. 1080/60/ultra wont require the same hardware to do so.


"The jump up to recommended Titanfall 2 system requirements is a dramatic one, but this is for those who want to max the game out and play at 1080p / 60 FPS. Respawn even say this spec is also very good at 1440p. "

1
Rep
27
Offline
15:14 Sep-25-2016

Another hype train destined for a low player base. Probably.

0
Rep
-33
Offline
03:40 Sep-25-2016

this game looked terrible, ill def sit this one out

0
Rep
154
Offline
admin approved badge
05:32 Sep-25-2016

Could you be maybe be a bit more specific of what's bad about it?

0
Rep
73
Offline
10:08 Sep-24-2016

I guess I only need another 8GB of RAM and 6GB of VRAM GPU but I only have 1366 x 768p monitor so no need for that :)

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
21:41 Sep-23-2016

4k here i come
cant wait to crush this game

0
Rep
4
Offline
07:00 Sep-24-2016

4k is unlikely since your card has only 4gb vram

1
Rep
73
Offline
10:18 Sep-24-2016

Not really Crossfire won't help you at 4K and their VRAM don't stack up so you only have 4GB which is enough for 1080p or 1440p gaming you can try at 4K Ultra but it would be a bad experience at this game

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
13:16 Sep-24-2016

trust me i know what im talking about. been doing this for a long time.
you both realize that the pro duo is a crossfire fury x at fury nano speed?


http://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?gid=3082&graphics=Radeon%20Pro%20Duo%208GB


http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=3368&gid2=3082&compare=radeon-r9-fury-x-4gb-crossfire-vs-radeon-pro-duo-8gb

0
Rep
73
Offline
15:34 Sep-24-2016

If my information are correct Dual GPUs and SLI/CFX are pretty much the same they just remove the clutter inside the case it's always best to buy a single card with it's own size of framebuffer.

2
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
07:43 Sep-25-2016

dual gpu and xfire/sli are the same. since the pro dual is two fury x which have 4gb vram on the gpu each, that means they are 8gb total with two gpus which is what i have. doesnt matter how they get into the system, they are still viewed as two gpus.
since these are amd flagship gpus, there was no way to get any better. what you are saying is i should have just bought one gpu. pro dual/fury x2 was just a pipe dream when i got these cards.

0
Rep
73
Offline
14:15 Sep-25-2016

I'm not judging you for buying a dual GPU card it's your own decision I was just ranting about how these dual GPUs, SLI/CFX don't have any advantages comparing it to one powerful single card.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
16:42 Sep-25-2016

i have the most power single gpu amd video card there is. i just also happen to have two of them. not a dual gpu card. i have 3 radiators in my case. h110i for the cpu and one thats built into each video card. for single amd gpus, i cant go any higher at this very point. telling me one powerful card is better is a moot point because i have the best amd sells. thats what ive been trying to tell you.

0
Rep
73
Offline
18:50 Sep-25-2016

Well you didn't tell me you had another card, I guess you don't like NVIDIA huh!

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
23:00 Sep-25-2016

actually you basically you told me you knew it based on your first comment to me above.


"Not really Crossfire won't help you at 4K and their VRAM don't stack up so you only have 4GB which is enough for 1080p or 1440p gaming you can try at 4K Ultra but it would be a bad experience at this game"

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
23:02 Sep-25-2016

1st - in the system requirements above it lists the amd pro duo 8gb for 4k gaming. that is a dual gpu single card version of fury x crossfire. I have fury x crossfire as confirmed by my profile. when I said "4k here I come" it means my system is easily capable of 4k/60 they list for this game. a pro duo card actually runs slightly slower than a standard fury x. my cpu is clocked higher than a fx-9370. since that's still a vishera core cpu, my cpu is actually better being clocked well over 5ghz.
2nd - if anyone doesn't understand why these gpus having 4gb of vram doesn't limit their 4k gaming, needs to research it.
3rd - I have had nvidia before.
4th - this is my 4th crossfire/sli setup

0
Rep
73
Offline
02:17 Sep-26-2016

I meant other cards other than your particular CFX ones (no need to reply furthermore)

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
05:35 Sep-26-2016

what you see in my system is what I have. it is two fury x cards. nothing more, nothing less.


ill put this very simply....this is a debate site. have the understanding and the facts to back up the stuff you have to say. without that you simply pointed out that you didn't read everything and/or understand the information that is presented in front of you.

0
Rep
1
Offline
19:18 Sep-23-2016

Superb. The last one had great optimization in the video department. Should run decent at high settings on my i5 4440 with gtx 1070, though I do plan to upgrade

0
Rep
154
Offline
admin approved badge
03:17 Sep-24-2016

Really? My 660 did terrible even on Low settings. I honestly think it was a terrible optimized game.

0
Rep
139
Offline
admin badge
15:42 Sep-23-2016

I wonder if i can run this 4k? I need to upgrade my 970's

0
Rep
40
Offline
admin approved badge
18:50 Sep-23-2016

I just got a 1060 and I'm super happy lol. I doubt that two 970 will have a hard time running this game. Idk about 4K though... in any case, good luck!

0
Rep
14
Offline
00:52 Sep-24-2016

1st, the 970 is too weak to run this game at at 4K with decent framerates
2nd, the 970 only has 4GB(3.5GB) of VRAM


I would stick to 1080p 60+ fps with the 970

0
Rep
139
Offline
admin badge
01:25 Sep-24-2016

Well I have already tested games at 4k with pretty good framerates, just gonna have to wait on this one

1
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
23:19 Sep-26-2016

it'll do 4k, just not ultra at 60fps.

0
Rep
1
Offline
15:08 Sep-23-2016

Can i run @ 1080p High 60fps with my current configuration as i've overclocked my gpu 11% core clock & 7% memory clock

0
Rep
139
Offline
admin badge
15:37 Sep-23-2016

I say yes

0
Rep
24
Offline
16:29 Sep-23-2016

you have no problem mate, the game seems to have some really good optimization

0
Rep
1
Offline
14:55 Sep-24-2016

Good News For Me Then

0
Rep
34
Offline
12:41 Sep-23-2016

Modified Source engine,demands a Pro Duo to run at 4k 60fps ? RIP 144hz monitors users.

2
Rep
34
Offline
12:47 Sep-23-2016

At least that means it will have Sli/Crossfier support.

2
Rep
33
Offline
16:14 Sep-24-2016

1080p it at 144Hz. 4k isn't a standard gaming resolution yet. 1080 or even 1440 are fine.

0
Rep
-3
Offline
10:44 Sep-23-2016

I smell not good but world class optimization here :) Will buy the game soon after its release.Can i run it on 900p maxed without any AA for constant 60 or 75 fps?I have my CPU on 3.3 Ghz and can OC my 970 to get 1060 level performance.Will my processor suffice for 900p Ultra?

0
Rep
207
Offline
admin approved badge
12:10 Sep-23-2016

By the GD rig u have an i7 and a GTX 1070 now if u have that CPU and a GTX 970 u can max it on 900p

1
Rep
-3
Offline
17:14 Sep-23-2016

Thanks

0
Rep
59
Offline
10:37 Sep-23-2016

seems fair but unfortunately not a fan of the game :p

1
Rep
40
Offline
admin approved badge
18:52 Sep-23-2016

Awe... If you got the extra money you should try the first one. You can pick it up for only a few bucks, and it is honestly very good, although I haven't played it in a while so I don't know if it still has any playerbase left. But it was pretty good.

0
Rep
15
Offline
admin approved badge
10:26 Sep-23-2016

Excuse me while I go throw my pathetic excuse for a PC out the window.

0
Rep
14
Offline
11:04 Sep-23-2016

Your kidding right?

0
Rep
15
Offline
admin approved badge
11:26 Sep-23-2016

Yes I am.

0
Rep
15
Offline
admin approved badge
11:29 Sep-23-2016

Also it's you're not your.

2
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
11:31 Sep-23-2016

lol

1
Rep
8
Offline
12:42 Sep-23-2016

who cares about inglish in websites... especially forum. But, y it is youRE

0
Rep
14
Offline
13:25 Sep-23-2016

Was busy and did not actually check my spelling :-( . Now the Nazi's caught me ... Blazkowicz I need backup.

4
Rep
32
Offline
10:13 Sep-23-2016

Not bad, looks like I can expect 60 FPS

0
Rep
8
Offline
10:12 Sep-23-2016

Cant they just post req for 1080 and 4k ceperate?

4
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
10:49 Sep-23-2016

That's the recommended?

0
Rep
8
Offline
12:40 Sep-23-2016

ik, but for example i want to run my game on ultra at 1080p. I dont want to buy gtx 1080 in order to play on 4k. It might need 980 or 970 to play at ultra 1080p.

0
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
14:25 Sep-23-2016

But we already know it's a GTX 1060 for Ultra 1080p. It says up there

0
Rep
8
Offline
12:39 Sep-23-2016

and now i have thumps up..

0
Rep
24
Offline
10:10 Sep-23-2016

well i don't play at 4k anyway, usually at 1440p for me

0
Rep
6
Offline
13:27 Sep-23-2016

Yes I agree 1440 is the way I use 32in 1440 monitor I wouldn't raise my screen resolution unless I was going with a bigger screen and 32 in the max I'm willing to go for my main monitor

0
Rep
44
Offline
09:58 Sep-23-2016

Damn, i really need to get more RAM, what's up with the games suddenly needing more ram. My 780 feels so weak that it has 3gb of vram :(

0
Rep
1
Offline
14:22 Sep-23-2016

Modern games these days are using more and better quality textures which requires more and more Vram. You probably be able to run this game fine (you have a better CPU than mine actually) but you may need to turn down texture quality.

0
Rep
219
Offline
admin approved badge
09:58 Sep-23-2016

so GTX 660 minimum , and GTX 1060 req is standard now , even you need a 16 GB :( , + 40GB+ at least of HDD , WHAT HAPPENED to GAMES this days?

6
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
10:00 Sep-23-2016

To be fair I don't know why a new AAA game would ever recommend below the current gen of graphics cards. The recommended is literally how they recommend you play it, which will of course take advantage of the latest hardware.


The performance gap between it and the GTX 660 is huge, so there's a lot of middle ground there which seems a fair deal.

0
Rep
59
Offline
10:45 Sep-23-2016

but its weird since games take years to be finished , i mean for example a game development start in 2013 and it is released in 2016 at the same time the new hardware come out which are the recommended system requirements !!!

2
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
10:50 Sep-23-2016

Yeah but they're not making a game for the hardware that's out when they start development, it's all theoretical.

0
Rep
59
Offline
10:52 Sep-23-2016

so how the developers back in 2013 knew the exact power needed to run their game when it will be released ?! i hope you get what i am saying though.

1
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
11:18 Sep-23-2016

No, that's not how it works. Someone could make a game right now which wouldn't even be playable on any hardware in three years time, but no one would buy it obviously. There's really no limit to how demanding they want a game can be but at some point during development they put a cap on it.

1
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
11:20 Sep-23-2016

Meh, don't know why the downvotes. I don't see how people can claim PC looks and plays the best and then complain it's too demanding. That's having your cake and eating it. I'd hardly call stagnating with a GTX 660 as the recommended being a good thing.

1
Rep
219
Offline
admin approved badge
12:12 Sep-23-2016

Even Jon , i never trusted the system req, Really! for example i am sure i can run this game with a GTX 750 2GB but in my res 768p. even an i3 can run it, so why they put i5 as a minimum?

0
Rep
95
Offline
10:51 Sep-23-2016

I get what you are saying (why recommend a last gen card when a new game will typically run best on the latest hardware).
But for those who really want to know beforehand how well the game runs (before benchmarks are out), this doesn't prove to be much use. It doesn't help that the entire new gen lineup might not be

0
Rep
95
Offline
10:53 Sep-23-2016

out yet. What if a 1050 can easily run this game? It just doesn't exist yet.
Anyway this argument almost doesn't have a point unfortunately, since most system reqts are so unreliable. You end up waiting for benchmarks anyway.

1
Rep
59
Offline
12:22 Sep-23-2016

yep well said bro! we've seen a lot of games with the same requirements lately . but on the benchmarks they don't run with the same performance and that's the proof .

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
23:31 Sep-26-2016

because system requirements dont dictate the game performance. even different games using the same engine arent going to benchmark the same. lets not even get into comparing games that have different requirements and use different engines. graphics arent the only thing going on in a game that dictate the requirements.

0
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
12:42 Sep-23-2016

Hey TheWizerd, I explain in the article what it's all about. Respawn said " In the past minimum specs were literally the minimum bar to launch the game - your experience once in the game was probably not going to be ideal. Our goal for minimum PC specs on Titanfall 2 is that you can play at a 1600x900 resolution with most details turned on and average around 60fps." So yeah, you can play it, it's just these specs aren't the rock bottom you can get away with.

1
Rep
219
Offline
admin approved badge
14:15 Sep-23-2016

Yeah I see no problem for your downvote post, so basically the minimum system req isn't for very low settings , maybe medium in 900p like you said.

0
Rep
8
Offline
12:44 Sep-23-2016

@leopard69 i think they just make the game how they feel right and then they test it to some pc's with low->mid->high generations gpu,cpu etc.. and then they decide what req to put. But some games if you dont support the min req the game can work on your pc, but with low fps &#6030

0

Can They Run... |

| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-11700K 8-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 6GB Edition 32GB
|
APU A8-7100 Quad-Core Radeon R7 M265 12GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-10700 8-Core 2.90GHz GeForce RTX 2060 6GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 30FPS, High, 1440p
Ryzen 7 2700X Radeon RX 5600 XT Sapphire Pulse 6GB 32GB
100% Yes [3 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core 3.7GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 8GB Edition 16GB
100% Yes [3 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-11400F 6-Core 2.6GHz GeForce GTX 970 4GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 2600X 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 2060 6GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 30FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i7-10750H 6-Core 2.60GHz GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 16GB
Ryzen 9 5900HX 8-Core 3.3GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 9 5900HX 8-Core 3.3GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3580U 4-Core 2.1GHz Radeon RX Vega 9 8GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-10750H 6-Core 2.60GHz GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [3 votes]
Ryzen 3 2300X 4-Core 3.5GHz Radeon RX 560 Sapphire Pulse OC 4GB 16GB
| 30FPS, Low, 720p
Ryzen 5 3400G 4-Core 3.7GHz Radeon RX Vega 11 6GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600H 6-Core 3.3GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [4 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1440p
Ryzen 7 2700X Radeon RX 5600 XT Sapphire Pulse 6GB 32GB
50% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen R5 1600 AF GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 30FPS, Low, 720p
Ryzen 5 3400G 4-Core 3.7GHz Radeon RX Vega 11 6GB
33.3333% Yes [3 votes]