EA may be sending it out on some sort of suicide mission just a week after Battlefield 1 arrives, but Titanfall 2 is going to be an undeniably huge event in the world of online shooters. Sandwiched in between BF and COD, Titanfall 2 looks to be the slickest of the bunch. Along with the multiplayer we already know was awesome last time around, we're also being treated to a full single-player campaign that's one man and his robot dog. Be prepared to titanfall with the official Titanfall 2 system requirements.
Titanfall 2 Minimum System Requirements
- OS: Windows 7 64-bit
- CPU: Intel Core i3-4130T 2.9 GHz or AMD FX-4200 3.3 GHz
- RAM: 8 GB System Memory
- VRAM: 2 GB Video Memory
- GPU: GeForce GTX 660 or AMD Radeon HD 7850
- DX: DirectX 11
- HDD: 45GB available storage space
Titanfall 2 Recommended System Requirements
- OS: Windows 7 64-bit
- CPU: Intel Core i5-6600 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8370 4.1 GHz
- RAM: 16 GB System Memory
- VRAM: 6 GB Video Memory
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 or AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB
- DX: DirectX 11
- HDD: 45GB available storage space
Titanfall 2 Ultra System Requirements
- OS: Windows 7 64-bit
- CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K 4.0 GHz or AMD FX-9370 4.4 GHz
- RAM: 16 GB System Memory
- VRAM: 8 GB Video Memory
- GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 or AMD Radeon Pro Duo 8GB
- DX: DirectX 11
- HDD: 45GB available storage space
Okay, so there's an absolutely huge range to the Titanfall 2 system requirements, so let's run over what they each mean.
Beginning with the minimum, these are actually quite low by today's standards for a AAA title, although they are quite a bit in excess of the original Titanfall's recommended requirements. Respawn has touted an intel Core i3-3600T or equivalent as the minimum, a CPU which doesn't even exist. We've taken a stab at the Intel Core i3-4130T and the AMD FX-4200 but these two are very much guesses at this stage.
When it comes to the minimum, Respawn has said this is definitely not the literal minimum specs with which you can run Titanfall 2. Instead, this is what you'll need to play 1600 x 900 resolution at 60 FPS with nearly all of the graphics settings turned on. So if you want to put up with a lower frame rate or worse graphics you can probably get away with going a generation or two older than the GTX 600 or Radeon HD 7000 series.
The jump up to recommended Titanfall 2 system requirements is a dramatic one, but this is for those who want to max the game out and play at 1080p / 60 FPS. Respawn even say this spec is also very good at 1440p. That's a very decently specced rig by today's standards, so if you can't quite hit that then there promises to be a lot of individual graphics options to squeeze out a few more frames at higher resolution.
Lastly there's the Ultra requirements. While at first glance they're liable to make your eyes pop out, this is in fact the hardware you will need to play Titanfall 2 at 4K resolution, Ultra graphics and 60 frames per second. Pretty much the ultimate experience but it requires a very powerful PC equipped with the latest GTX 1080 or AMD Radeon Pro Duo graphics cards and high-end CPUs.
Remember, you can always check out how well your PC can run the Titanfall 2 System Requirements here, where you can check benchmarking and performance from other users. Compare your graphics card to the Titanfall 2 benchmark chart.
Login or Register to join the debate
PC Specs
hahahahaha, it's so fun, amd pro duo is 20-30% better than gtx 1080 in most dx11 games, in dx12 will be more, this is strange, if for ultra is amd pro duo, for NVidia gpus have to be titan x pascal
PC Specs
May be that it is better optimised for nVidia cards.
PC Specs
fury x is around 1070 performance. the pro duo is slightly underclocked compared to fury x (fury nano speed). the shader performance between pro duo and 1080 is pretty close. also have to remember that the pro duo is a dual gpu card and the system sees it as such. scaling wont be 100% between the two gpus so in reality its even closer to 1080 performance.
PC Specs
i bet you can run the game on ultra. high with older card, the new one is still fresh and new so the dev figure it out just yet
PC Specs
the ultra requirements are for 4k/60/ultra. 1080/60/ultra wont require the same hardware to do so.
"The jump up to recommended Titanfall 2 system requirements is a dramatic one, but this is for those who want to max the game out and play at 1080p / 60 FPS. Respawn even say this spec is also very good at 1440p. "
PC Specs
Another hype train destined for a low player base. Probably.
PC Specs
this game looked terrible, ill def sit this one out
PC Specs
Could you be maybe be a bit more specific of what's bad about it?
PC Specs
I guess I only need another 8GB of RAM and 6GB of VRAM GPU but I only have 1366 x 768p monitor so no need for that :)
PC Specs
4k here i come
cant wait to crush this game
PC Specs
4k is unlikely since your card has only 4gb vram
PC Specs
Not really Crossfire won't help you at 4K and their VRAM don't stack up so you only have 4GB which is enough for 1080p or 1440p gaming you can try at 4K Ultra but it would be a bad experience at this game
PC Specs
trust me i know what im talking about. been doing this for a long time.
you both realize that the pro duo is a crossfire fury x at fury nano speed?
http://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?gid=3082&graphics=Radeon%20Pro%20Duo%208GB
http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=3368&gid2=3082&compare=radeon-r9-fury-x-4gb-crossfire-vs-radeon-pro-duo-8gb
PC Specs
If my information are correct Dual GPUs and SLI/CFX are pretty much the same they just remove the clutter inside the case it's always best to buy a single card with it's own size of framebuffer.
PC Specs
dual gpu and xfire/sli are the same. since the pro dual is two fury x which have 4gb vram on the gpu each, that means they are 8gb total with two gpus which is what i have. doesnt matter how they get into the system, they are still viewed as two gpus.
since these are amd flagship gpus, there was no way to get any better. what you are saying is i should have just bought one gpu. pro dual/fury x2 was just a pipe dream when i got these cards.
PC Specs
I'm not judging you for buying a dual GPU card it's your own decision I was just ranting about how these dual GPUs, SLI/CFX don't have any advantages comparing it to one powerful single card.
PC Specs
i have the most power single gpu amd video card there is. i just also happen to have two of them. not a dual gpu card. i have 3 radiators in my case. h110i for the cpu and one thats built into each video card. for single amd gpus, i cant go any higher at this very point. telling me one powerful card is better is a moot point because i have the best amd sells. thats what ive been trying to tell you.
PC Specs
Well you didn't tell me you had another card, I guess you don't like NVIDIA huh!
PC Specs
actually you basically you told me you knew it based on your first comment to me above.
"Not really Crossfire won't help you at 4K and their VRAM don't stack up so you only have 4GB which is enough for 1080p or 1440p gaming you can try at 4K Ultra but it would be a bad experience at this game"
PC Specs
1st - in the system requirements above it lists the amd pro duo 8gb for 4k gaming. that is a dual gpu single card version of fury x crossfire. I have fury x crossfire as confirmed by my profile. when I said "4k here I come" it means my system is easily capable of 4k/60 they list for this game. a pro duo card actually runs slightly slower than a standard fury x. my cpu is clocked higher than a fx-9370. since that's still a vishera core cpu, my cpu is actually better being clocked well over 5ghz.
2nd - if anyone doesn't understand why these gpus having 4gb of vram doesn't limit their 4k gaming, needs to research it.
3rd - I have had nvidia before.
4th - this is my 4th crossfire/sli setup
PC Specs
I meant other cards other than your particular CFX ones (no need to reply furthermore)
PC Specs
what you see in my system is what I have. it is two fury x cards. nothing more, nothing less.
ill put this very simply....this is a debate site. have the understanding and the facts to back up the stuff you have to say. without that you simply pointed out that you didn't read everything and/or understand the information that is presented in front of you.
PC Specs
Superb. The last one had great optimization in the video department. Should run decent at high settings on my i5 4440 with gtx 1070, though I do plan to upgrade
PC Specs
Really? My 660 did terrible even on Low settings. I honestly think it was a terrible optimized game.
PC Specs
I wonder if i can run this 4k? I need to upgrade my 970's
PC Specs
I just got a 1060 and I'm super happy lol. I doubt that two 970 will have a hard time running this game. Idk about 4K though... in any case, good luck!
PC Specs
1st, the 970 is too weak to run this game at at 4K with decent framerates
2nd, the 970 only has 4GB(3.5GB) of VRAM
I would stick to 1080p 60+ fps with the 970
PC Specs
Well I have already tested games at 4k with pretty good framerates, just gonna have to wait on this one
PC Specs
it'll do 4k, just not ultra at 60fps.
PC Specs
Can i run @ 1080p High 60fps with my current configuration as i've overclocked my gpu 11% core clock & 7% memory clock
PC Specs
I say yes
PC Specs
you have no problem mate, the game seems to have some really good optimization
PC Specs
Good News For Me Then
PC Specs
Modified Source engine,demands a Pro Duo to run at 4k 60fps ? RIP 144hz monitors users.
PC Specs
At least that means it will have Sli/Crossfier support.
PC Specs
1080p it at 144Hz. 4k isn't a standard gaming resolution yet. 1080 or even 1440 are fine.
PC Specs
I smell not good but world class optimization here :) Will buy the game soon after its release.Can i run it on 900p maxed without any AA for constant 60 or 75 fps?I have my CPU on 3.3 Ghz and can OC my 970 to get 1060 level performance.Will my processor suffice for 900p Ultra?
PC Specs
By the GD rig u have an i7 and a GTX 1070 now if u have that CPU and a GTX 970 u can max it on 900p
PC Specs
Thanks
PC Specs
seems fair but unfortunately not a fan of the game :p
PC Specs
Awe... If you got the extra money you should try the first one. You can pick it up for only a few bucks, and it is honestly very good, although I haven't played it in a while so I don't know if it still has any playerbase left. But it was pretty good.
PC Specs
Excuse me while I go throw my pathetic excuse for a PC out the window.
PC Specs
Your kidding right?
PC Specs
Yes I am.
PC Specs
Also it's you're not your.
PC Specs
lol
PC Specs
who cares about inglish in websites... especially forum. But, y it is youRE
PC Specs
Was busy and did not actually check my spelling :-( . Now the Nazi's caught me ... Blazkowicz I need backup.
PC Specs
http://68.media.tumblr.com/a11c9e5591cc539bcac7cb4e8ceacf3e/tumblr_n50ypaxD7O1r0fbd7o5_500.png
PC Specs
Not bad, looks like I can expect 60 FPS
PC Specs
Cant they just post req for 1080 and 4k ceperate?
PC Specs
That's the recommended?
PC Specs
ik, but for example i want to run my game on ultra at 1080p. I dont want to buy gtx 1080 in order to play on 4k. It might need 980 or 970 to play at ultra 1080p.
PC Specs
But we already know it's a GTX 1060 for Ultra 1080p. It says up there
PC Specs
and now i have thumps up..
PC Specs
well i don't play at 4k anyway, usually at 1440p for me
PC Specs
Yes I agree 1440 is the way I use 32in 1440 monitor I wouldn't raise my screen resolution unless I was going with a bigger screen and 32 in the max I'm willing to go for my main monitor
PC Specs
Damn, i really need to get more RAM, what's up with the games suddenly needing more ram. My 780 feels so weak that it has 3gb of vram :(
PC Specs
Modern games these days are using more and better quality textures which requires more and more Vram. You probably be able to run this game fine (you have a better CPU than mine actually) but you may need to turn down texture quality.
PC Specs
so GTX 660 minimum , and GTX 1060 req is standard now , even you need a 16 GB :( , + 40GB+ at least of HDD , WHAT HAPPENED to GAMES this days?
PC Specs
To be fair I don't know why a new AAA game would ever recommend below the current gen of graphics cards. The recommended is literally how they recommend you play it, which will of course take advantage of the latest hardware.
The performance gap between it and the GTX 660 is huge, so there's a lot of middle ground there which seems a fair deal.
PC Specs
but its weird since games take years to be finished , i mean for example a game development start in 2013 and it is released in 2016 at the same time the new hardware come out which are the recommended system requirements !!!
PC Specs
Yeah but they're not making a game for the hardware that's out when they start development, it's all theoretical.
PC Specs
so how the developers back in 2013 knew the exact power needed to run their game when it will be released ?! i hope you get what i am saying though.
PC Specs
No, that's not how it works. Someone could make a game right now which wouldn't even be playable on any hardware in three years time, but no one would buy it obviously. There's really no limit to how demanding they want a game can be but at some point during development they put a cap on it.
PC Specs
Meh, don't know why the downvotes. I don't see how people can claim PC looks and plays the best and then complain it's too demanding. That's having your cake and eating it. I'd hardly call stagnating with a GTX 660 as the recommended being a good thing.
PC Specs
Even Jon , i never trusted the system req, Really! for example i am sure i can run this game with a GTX 750 2GB but in my res 768p. even an i3 can run it, so why they put i5 as a minimum?
PC Specs
I get what you are saying (why recommend a last gen card when a new game will typically run best on the latest hardware).
But for those who really want to know beforehand how well the game runs (before benchmarks are out), this doesn't prove to be much use. It doesn't help that the entire new gen lineup might not be
PC Specs
out yet. What if a 1050 can easily run this game? It just doesn't exist yet.
Anyway this argument almost doesn't have a point unfortunately, since most system reqts are so unreliable. You end up waiting for benchmarks anyway.
PC Specs
yep well said bro! we've seen a lot of games with the same requirements lately . but on the benchmarks they don't run with the same performance and that's the proof .
PC Specs
because system requirements dont dictate the game performance. even different games using the same engine arent going to benchmark the same. lets not even get into comparing games that have different requirements and use different engines. graphics arent the only thing going on in a game that dictate the requirements.
PC Specs
Hey TheWizerd, I explain in the article what it's all about. Respawn said " In the past minimum specs were literally the minimum bar to launch the game - your experience once in the game was probably not going to be ideal. Our goal for minimum PC specs on Titanfall 2 is that you can play at a 1600x900 resolution with most details turned on and average around 60fps." So yeah, you can play it, it's just these specs aren't the rock bottom you can get away with.
PC Specs
Yeah I see no problem for your downvote post, so basically the minimum system req isn't for very low settings , maybe medium in 900p like you said.
PC Specs
@leopard69 i think they just make the game how they feel right and then they test it to some pc's with low->mid->high generations gpu,cpu etc.. and then they decide what req to put. But some games if you dont support the min req the game can work on your pc, but with low fps ណ