Up For Debate - Do Conflict Minerals and Ethical Supply Chains Affect Your PC Purchases?

Written by Jon Sutton on Sun, May 28, 2017 4:23 PM

One of the often overlooked elements when purchasing snazzy new gaming hardware is the human cost. No, not the cost of you going to work for hour upon hour, saving up the cash for that svelte new graphics card, but the cost in human lives when obtaining the minerals necessary to manufacture the graphics chips and CPUs. A huge portion of minerals used are obtained from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding African countries. Historically this has been a cause for the concern, with the DRC trapped in one world’s worst modern humanitarian crises. The hunt for rare minerals has attracted armed groups and militia, committing human rights abuses in an effort to mine tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG).

Gold has proven the deadliest resource in modern times. Profits from the sales of minerals in DRC has financed the Second Congo War, propped up armies and rebel groups, and led to the deaths of millions.

Naturally, the big chip manufacturers are keen to avoid controversy on this front. AMD, Nvidia and Intel have all signed various deals in an effort to comply with responsible minerals trade. Avoiding conflict minerals entirely is a tricky process, however, with each of the three companies going to varying degrees to ensure their minerals are obtained from as legitimate a source as possible.

There’s good will to be earned by going conflict-free, no company wants to be tarnished with Conflict Minerals, which carries with it the weight of brutal human rights atrocities, militia groups and murder. It can even be used as the chief selling point, just look at the Fairphone, the world’s first totally ethical smartphone.

AMD - AMD is a founder of the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA). This is an organisation dedicated to helping the DRC and surrounding territories break the link between the mineral trade and human rights abuses. AMD is also a member of the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI), a third-party group which audits smelters and refineries in order to determine whether the minerals have come from conflict-free sources. AMD claims 96% of its smelters or refiners are compliance with CFSP audit protocols, while the remaining 4% are actively in the process of completing the CFSP audit. They may pass, they may not. Interestingly, AMD said all of its “primary silicon wafer foundries are conflict-free”, based on analysis of TSMC and GlobalFoundries as of March 31, 2016.

Intel - Unlike AMD and Nvidia, Intel has its own fabrication plants. Intel goes in quite big on the conflict-free minerals, saying it is “committed to using only Conflict-Free mineral resources, which means greater economic opportunities for miners and their families.” Reading the fine print, Conflict-Free refers to obtaining minerals that, based on Intel’s due diligence, do not benefit or financed armed groups. This doesn’t mean the minerals sourced are guaranteed to be conflict-free, however, Intel would argue it is doing everything within its power to ensure they aren’t, to the best of Intel’s knowledge.

On Intel’s site, they go to great pains to let you know it has created a “responsible supply chain” which is “helping families in the Congo.” The overall impression is of Intel using Conflict-Free minerals across the board, however, digging a little deeper, Intel’s latest Conflict Mineral Report says “Although many of our hardware products contain conflict minerals, we do not purchase ore or unrefined  conflict minerals from mines.” And again, later in the document, “We purchase materials used in our products from a large network of supplies; some of those materials contribute necessary conflict minerals to our products. The origin of conflicted minerals cannot be determined with any certainty once the ores are smelted, refined and converted to ingots, bullion or other conflict minerals containing derivatives.” The gist of that being - 3TG is obtained from conflict sources where human rights abuses may be taking place, however, Intel is too far removed in the supply chain to determine for sure, relying on its suppliers to exercise due diligence.

Nvidia - As with AMD, Nvidia is a member of both the PPA and the CSFI. Both of these organisations aim to ensure the traceability of minerals. That is, to determine where and how these minerals turned up. Again, this comes down to a due diligence process. Nvidia has its own team dealing with suppliers, operations, legal issues, sales and marketing, along with 3rd party to support to validate their findings.

Again though, Nvidia’s Specialized Disclosure Report is keen to emphasise that Nvidia is a long way down the supply chain from the source. Nvidia, like AMD, doesn’t manufacture its own chips, relying on supplies for wafer fabrication, assembly, testing and the procurement of the raw materials. This is but just one step in Nvidia distancing itself from the minerals themselves.

“NVIDIA’s supply chain is complex and there are multiple tiers between NVIDIA and the actual mining of the conflict minerals,” reads the report. “Because we utilize a fabless manufacturing strategy, we must rely on our suppliers and component manufacturers, including sub-tier suppliers, to provide us with information on the origin of the conflict minerals contained in our products and product components. We are filing this Conflict Minerals Report pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Rule 13p-1, because we are unable to determine, as of the date of the filing of the Form SD to which this Conflict Minerals Report is an exhibit, the origin of all conflict minerals that were contained in the products we contracted to manufacture during the Reporting Period.”

All in all, the more I explored this topic, the murkier the waters became. Everyone is keen to tout ethical standards and complying with regulations, but the actual task of sourcing and tracking the minerals is next to impossible. Outwardly, AMD seems to impress the most on this front, however, it's a tricky balance between meeting demands and obtaining the minerals through any means necessary.

At the end of the day, all we can do is vote with our wallets, but do you? Despite their best efforts, conflict minerals may still be used in chip fabrication, does this impact what PC hardware you purchase? Let us know!

Do Conflict Minerals and Ethical Supply Chains Affect Your PC Purchases?

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
1
Offline
17:09 May-29-2017

Well.. Intel was the only company saying their processors were conflict-free a few years back and it was the only time I remember it having such a big impact, they sent boxes to youtubers like the time capsule thing for the 5960x I think it was. But yeah if a manufacturer says it on the box it would influence my choice

0
Rep
6
Offline
13:38 May-29-2017

I don't know enough about this to be able to factor it into my purchases, but if a company were to explicitly state with certainty that all materials for building their hardware were ethically sourced i'd preferentially choose those.

1
Rep
12
Offline
11:43 May-29-2017

Good article. Never thought about this earlier.

11
Rep
62
Offline
admin approved badge
10:21 May-29-2017

If one box says "ethically produced" and other says "produced in Kongo. Ps. We don't give a **** about people who mined the ores for this", I'd buy the ethically produced one. But that being said, unless it's said on the box that it's ethically produced, I'll still buy anything that performs good. But maybe next time I buy stuff, I'll be left wondering if it's ethical or not x_x

7
Rep
12
Offline
11:42 May-29-2017

Couldn't agree more.

1
Rep
109
Offline
admin approved badge
09:47 May-29-2017

Best Price to Performance ratio.
thats all that matters for me when it comes to hardware/computer accessories because TBH I just don't care as much, I mean I don't support conflict minerals and its great that companies and some NGOs are doing some action against conflict minerals, but in the end, money is too hard to earn for ethics to get in the way at this situation, we're more willing to just buy the stuff with the best price to performance ratio, even if its not computer related.

1
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
09:24 May-29-2017

It's a bit of a tricky one. While financing crime isn't something I agree on - at the end of the day we already finance atrocious human rights violations by buying chinese goods to begin with.
But then again, I guess I kinda don't really care - if there are idiots out there that wage wars over stuff like who will mine what then it's their own doing.
Let's be honest here though, if a company, say, AMviDia popped up saying "we have the same stuff as the competitor, but at a lower price because we don't care who mines and smelts our supplies" - wouldn't you buy from them? Ethics comes with a price, after all, and most people here voted with that in mind :)

3
Rep
5
Offline
08:44 May-29-2017

I believe a few countries need some "freedom"

1
Rep
15
Offline
08:25 May-29-2017

I don't have the time to research if stuff I buy is "ethical" or not. If I can do a quick search, sure, but I don't care to spend hours researching. I don't have that kind of time to spare.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
07:36 May-29-2017

What?

1
Rep
17
Offline
03:50 May-29-2017

Good article Jon (claps).

4
Rep
7
Offline
03:02 May-29-2017

It doesnt a whole lot. But if I saw two equal CPU's, one with a sticker saying "Conflict Free" and one saying "Not Conflict Free" id probably buy the conflict free one.

2
Rep
3
Offline
07:47 May-29-2017

and if i see two equal Electronic product one with a sticker saying "Conflict Free" and +1$price and the other with none id probably get the cheaper one.

2
Rep
5
Offline
16:51 May-29-2017

You'd rather save a dollar, that's pure dick head there

-1
Rep
7
Offline
22:04 May-29-2017

I mean for an extra $1 id probably get the conflict free one tbh. Now if it was like an extra $15-20 id probably go the non conflict free box.

2
Rep
3
Offline
14:49 May-30-2017

u miss the point the other one isn't conflict full(is that really a word?) it's just missing the conflict free tag i mean it's just a tag having or not having it doesn't mean anything!? so why i should pay an extra $ for it?

0
Rep
3
Offline
02:00 May-29-2017

I'm glad these companies are doing their parts in all of this but honestly I didn't Know that there ware problems with any resources other than gold and diamonds :/ Then again... I don't pay much attention to these matters either...

0
Rep
105
Offline
02:48 May-29-2017

Well, microchips are made of gold so...

0
Rep
53
Offline
admin approved badge
21:25 May-28-2017

Best price for performance. That's all that matters.

6
Rep
3
Offline
20:59 May-28-2017

oh now we got humanitarian minerals and also humanitarian chips like humanitarian bombs weren't enough!

4
Rep
50
Offline
19:21 May-28-2017

Due simply due to how little I buy new hardware I don't take it into consideration. If i was buying a new GPU/CPU every few months I might, but not when its once every 2-4 years.

2
Rep
7
Offline
19:15 May-28-2017

This is actually an interesting article. Never even took this into consideration, only thought of blood diamonds when it came to unethical mining. It probably doesn't sway my purchases especially since these companies appear to care enough that they're doing something about it.

3
Rep
319
Offline
admin badge
19:03 May-28-2017

well... I stupid as this may sound I didnt have a single clue about all this. Now that I know, I do care though. Supporting military groups and slavery isnt exactly my thing. Or something that I woundnt care about.

1
Rep
207
Offline
admin approved badge
18:46 May-28-2017

They're rocks jon :P

8
Rep
2
Offline
18:13 May-28-2017

When I read the headline I knew there would be some funny comments and I wasnt disappointed. :)

1
Rep
-9
Offline
18:05 May-28-2017

if my CPU would be made of lil fingers and my GPU out of eyes i wouldnt care less as long as it perfomes goooood :))) this is by far one of the most stupid articles on GD :)

-11

Can They Run... |

| Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core 3.8GHz Radeon RX 570 4GB 16GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 720p
Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93GHz Radeon R7 250X Sapphire 1GB Edition 4GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-10870H 8-Core 2.20GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 4k
APU A10-9700E 4-Core 3.0GHz Radeon R5 M320 2GB 12GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-11400 6-Core 2.7GHz GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Asus TUF Gaming 6GB 16GB
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i5-6500 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1060 16GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3500 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1660 Asus Phoenix OC 6GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1060 Gigabyte Windforce 2X OC 3GB 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-12700K 16-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB 32GB
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Ryzen 7 2700X Radeon RX 550X 4GB 24GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i5-10600KF 6-Core 4.10GHz Radeon RX 580 Asus Dual 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-11400F 6-Core 2.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 MSI Gaming X 6G Edition 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 2600 Radeon RX 580 4GB 8GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i5-4570 3.2GHz Radeon HD 7970 OC Sapphire Edition 16GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i7-8086K 6-Core 4.0GHz GeForce GTX 980 4GB 32GB
| Low, 1080p
Core i5-7400 3.0GHz GeForce GTX 1050 Palit StormX 2GB 12GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gigabyte Aorus Master 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [4 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gigabyte Aorus Master 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 4k
Core i9-10900KF 10-Core 3.70GHz GeForce RTX 2080 Super MSI Ventus XS OC 8GB 64GB