Team Fortress 2 Looks Graphically Worse Now than it did a Decade Ago, Comparison Vid Shows

Written by Stuart Thomas on Thu, Jun 29, 2017 12:44 PM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

The Team Fortress 2 community has been getting itself all hot and bothered about a new comparison video which appears to confirm Team Fortress 2 PC looks worse now than it did in 2007. A decade has passed and TF2 has been updated innumerable times, yet visually, the game has gone backwards.

An extensive video from CrowbCat breaks down the changes which, while often small, nevertheless clearly indicate that Team Fortress 2 has had a minor visual downgrade in the 120 months since its launch. What’s even weirder is the 2007 footage is taken from the console version, Xbox 360 to be precise, and somehow PC is looking a little worse in 2017. The changes are pretty widespread too, from lower resolution textures to simplified geometry, massively simplified weapon models, worse lighting and downgraded water effects.

There could be all sorts of reasons for these changes. Firstly, Valve could be deadset on getting Team Fortress 2 running on just about any old potato. Running the game at a stable frame rate and respectable resolution is now very much possible with integrated graphics, and any downgrade, no matter how small, will always help on this front. Look at 1:52 and you can see a great example of something being greatly simplified, with the medic’s original revolving gun becoming a static chamber. If Valve did do this though, I’m curious why they wouldn’t just lower the visual quality at the lower graphics settings, rather than taking a hit on the max settings in TF2.

The shift to free-to-play no doubt contributed to graphical downgrade, with Team Fortress 2 now tagged as the game you can run on just about any hardware configuration.

Secondly, this could also be down to visual clarity. These changes may not amount to much on their own, but if these little tweaks allow you to more easily identify a character (one of Valve’s major design focuses in TF2 was that every character is recognisable via silhouette alone), or to not confuse objects in the environment, then it would make sense for Valve to tweak them. It’s a bit of a stretch but the paintwork at 1:25 could be mistaken for a tunnel or a doorway, and fading it eliminates this confusion.

Lastly, there’s the huge number of cosmetic items that have been added to Team Fortress 2 since launch. While seemingly inconsequential, there are now potentially thousands upon thousands of unique hats and animations, all of which could sap vital performance away from the core game. I always knew hats were a bad idea.

So what do you make of Team Fortress 2’s visual downgrade? Is Valve right to go a step backwards in order to accommodate more players, or should be treading the route Blizzard has opted for with WoW, providing small yet consistent visual improvements?

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
0
Offline
11:49 Jun-30-2017

I think it's unfortunate that they did this, but the first assumption I made was so that it's smoother to run. Especially after all those cosmetic additions...

1
Rep
0
Offline
11:50 Jun-30-2017

That said; I was running this game in 2007 on a Pentium 4, so I don't see why they couldn't figure out how to just optimize it without reducing details.

0
Rep
94
Offline
20:46 Jun-30-2017

This is cheaper though, but I'm not sure how well the micro transactions are

0
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
20:26 Jun-29-2017

Suppose there's no need to downgrade or do anything to the console versions because they're running fixed hardware - Valve know the game runs and how well it runs there's nothing else they need to do. On PC, on the other hand, they probably wanted to capture the "potato PC" audience - people who buy cheap laptops or tablets and want to plink something every now and again. Players are players and they may still have wallets full of money for hats :)
I can understand the removal of certain physics elements altogether - can't have items moving around for one player and not moving for the other - pretty obvious. But graphical elements, like shaders and textures..? That does puzzle me.

1
Rep
81
Offline
admin approved badge
17:45 Jun-29-2017

B-But now it has particle effects from the hats!

0
Rep
57
Offline
15:03 Jun-29-2017

optimisation?

0
Rep
6
Offline
13:40 Jun-29-2017

The footage isn't taken from the console versions though, it's still from an older pc version. The video description says "All of this is still present on Xbox 360 and PS3 with Orange Box.", not that the footage was from an xbox 360.

6
Rep
-13
Offline
13:23 Jun-29-2017

lol.... next gen

0

Can They Run... |

Core i3-8145U 2-Core 2.1GHz UHD Graphics 620 24GB
Core 2 Duo E7200 2.53GHz GeForce 210 2GB
| 30FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i7-7500U 2-Core 2.7GHz GeForce 940MX 2GB 8GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Core i9-9900K 8-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 64GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 720p
Core i3-4130 3.4GHz Radeon HD 6970 4GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| Low,
Pentium Dual Core E5200 2.5GHz Intel G41 Express Chipset 2GB