Intel Forced Back to 22nm Process Due to 14nm Supply Constraints and 10nm Fabrication

Written by Jon Sutton on Mon, Sep 24, 2018 12:57 PM

In a very embarrassing turn of events, Intel has been forced to take a step backward and return to 22nm CPU manufacturing. The reported supply constraints of 14nm chips, combined with significant issues with chip yields at 10nm, has meant Intel has had to stage a historic about-turn to address CPU shortages.

10nm production is a well-documented disaster for Intel, who have suffered yield issues that have led to repeated delays. Lest we forget, Intel said back in January 2017 that 10nm Cannonlake chips were on target for a 2017 launch. Here we are, 20 months later, and Intel has said it hopes its first 10nm CPUs will launch in Q4 2019. This, combined with the tight supply of 14nm silicon, has forced the backward step.

Intel’s first step back to the 22nm process node will be the H310 chipset. This will allegedly be a low-end chipset designed for low-end 8th and 9th Gen Intel Core CPUs. The older processing node should make them nice and cheap, although at the expense of performance and efficiency.

The H310C chip measures 10mm x 7mm, compared to the previous H310 14nm spec of 8.5 x 6.5mm. This footprint is roughly 27% larger than Intel had originally intended. This 22nm chip will replace an older Intel 14nm CPU in a bit to alleviate supply shortages. While the number of Intel chips produced on the 22nm process could be small, it’s certainly not a good look and a further indicator that Intel is finding itself in a bit of a pickle.

For AMD, Intel’s stumbles represent a huge opportunity for growth. Analysts have already predicted AMD’s market share could triple as a result of Intel’s production issues. “Fubon’s report that Intel will undersupply the PC market between 4Q18 and 2Q19 leaves us with higher conviction that AMD will report improving revenue, pricing and margins near term, and that is positioned to take share in the high-end PC MPU and server market long term,” said market analyst Mark Lipacis.

AMD currently controls around a 10% share of the global CPU market, but this could climb as high a 30% by mid-2019. “Assuming our assessment of AMD’s transistor lead in 2019 is correct, and Intel’s supply constraints linger through mid-19, we think a market share of 70/30 is not out of the question,” continued Lipacis.

Worrying times for Intel then, who has been forced to take vital but negative steps in order to keep supplies stocked. Things could be set to get even hairier if AMD doesn’t suffer any major setbacks with the 7nm process, effectively leapfrogging Intel’s much delayed 10nm chips.

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
55
Offline
11:08 Sep-25-2018

This is exactly what happens when a company stops innovating.

7
Rep
11
Offline
07:36 Sep-25-2018

so little improvement over the years bought my first i7 3 years ago and still rock solid..., even in the graphics market so little improvement with this RTX release

2
Rep
7
Offline
05:08 Sep-29-2018

still better gaming performance than amd though

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
06:55 Sep-29-2018

Gaming isn't everything.

0
Rep
14
Offline
04:02 Sep-25-2018

lel AMD got them by the BALLZZZ!!!

3
Rep
7
Offline
06:17 Sep-25-2018

You know nobody caught no one by balls. Intel manufactures it's chipsets on 14 nm node, whereas AMD manufactures it's chipset on 55 nm node (FYI smaller is better). It doesn't matter if Intel shifts one of it's chipset to older technology.

1
Rep
7
Offline
03:11 Sep-25-2018

I don't understand the comments. How could a motherboard chipset production rolled back to 22 nm would make their 22 nm processors latest technology?

0
Rep
50
Offline
03:39 Sep-25-2018

Your chipset isn't your CPU, there is no real reason why Intel had to build their chipsets on the same node as their CPU's unless they are really chasing all out efficiency

0
Rep
7
Offline
05:57 Sep-25-2018

Yes i know. That is why I'm asking how could a motherboard chipset production rolled back to 22 nm would make their 22 nm processors latest technology? Those attempts to make it into memes are quite nonsense.

0
Rep
50
Offline
01:15 Sep-25-2018

a pleasant reminder that AMD built their 300 and 400 series chipsets were built on 55nm to keep costs down, there is no reason why Intel had to use the same generation node for chipsets as with CPU's at all, in fact even AM3(+) and FM2(+) chipsets were never on a node smaller than 45nm IIRC

1
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
00:35 Sep-25-2018

So my Core i7 3770K has the latest tech?! Awesome!


In a serious note, this is so funny. I recommend AMD for EVERYONE!

1
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
18:15 Sep-24-2018

maybe, just MAYBE, that's why Apple announced earlier they'll take care of own cpus for their devices in future?

0
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
20:57 Sep-25-2018

That, or the fact that they have cash raining out their a$$es and they want to charge idiots even more for their crappy computers...

1
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
11:58 Sep-27-2018

hah yea, even more likely actually xD

0
Rep
55
Offline
16:56 Sep-24-2018

As I've previously said... my intel i7 4th gen is immortal!

12
Rep
210
Offline
admin approved badge
14:43 Sep-25-2018

high five :D

0
Rep
39
Offline
16:16 Sep-24-2018

They always find an excuse to that....so what's next? Maybe that their factory will be destroyed by winged elephants??? Seriously, at this rate they will not see my money for the next decade...

0
Rep
21
Offline
16:13 Sep-24-2018

the question is who is buy that much of chips and why? pre ryzen era there were no shortages so then after ryzen, people should be buying even less, then how come intel is selling so much.

11
Rep
57
Offline
16:52 Sep-24-2018

good question i would like some to elaborate on this further...

0
Rep
7
Offline
05:11 Sep-29-2018

in general, the amount of people using computers is increasing, maybe that's why

0
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
09:31 Sep-29-2018

I'd say companies do,
enterprise sector usually replaces hardware when warranty expires, not when it stops functioning, so the replace rates are way quicker than among regular consumers

0
Rep
12
Offline
16:05 Sep-24-2018

In the EU Intel prices spiked insanely today. The cheapest 8700k i can find in the Netherlands is 500 euros. That's a 39% increase of the old 360 euro price.

4
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
16:16 Sep-24-2018

Prices haven't gone up here in the UK yet but the 8700K does now say 1-2 months expected delivery date

0
Rep
12
Offline
20:50 Sep-24-2018

guess 8th gen stock is running out maybe in preparation for 9th gen. A dutch retailer put up the 9900k for a few mins at 550 euros today.

0
Rep
57
Offline
16:46 Sep-24-2018

Same here in Lithuania, prices were from 340-360 EUR for 8700k now they are sold out and price is 500 EUR too, which is insane, if they will stick for longer time we should see many more ryzen 7 cpu's around.

0
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
18:09 Sep-24-2018

I noticed 8700K and 8600K are no longer sold here, but the variants with "DELID" in name are fresh new to hit stores,
price is ridiculous, 8700K DELID costs even more than my 5820K costed when it was new, that's crazy

1
Rep
-4
Offline
23:52 Sep-24-2018

Lucky me got the 8700 for just 250€ a month ago, but her in germany the cheapest 8700k now is at least 450€

0
Rep
19
Offline
00:28 Sep-25-2018

Agreed to the intel core i7 8700k price here in the netherlands.
Was pre building a pc for a friend of mine (tho he decided to go for xbox one x in the end) and when we first looked, 8700k was about 350 euros. Nowadays, azerty (best store in the netherlands for pc parts) lists it for 499 euros.
Tho, my cpu (ryzen 7 1800x) is cheaper then ever, just only 248,95 euros..
So, easy choice not then?

0
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
15:24 Sep-24-2018

So my 22nm i7-5960X from 2014 is latest tech again. Cool xD

10
Rep
87
Offline
16:43 Sep-24-2018

How the tables have turned!

4
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
08:19 Sep-25-2018

I'm not complaining. Just means my CPU lasts even longer xD

-1
Rep
132
Offline
14:54 Sep-24-2018

I'm really hoping AMD delivers with 7nm Ryzen.


Should really spice things up if they execute it properly.

6
Rep
74
Offline
15:02 Sep-24-2018

True, but there isn't really a necessity is there? Current Ryzen are brilliant in terms of performance and cheaper than the Intel counterparts. Trying to shrink down to 7nm could prove fatal.

0
Rep
96
Offline
admin approved badge
13:54 Sep-24-2018

Nice, maybe use the old sockets as well? I could use an upgrade. :P

9
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
14:23 Sep-24-2018

nah you're just fine for few more years I guess now xD

0
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
13:40 Sep-24-2018

so my i7-3770K and i7-5820K are actually making use of latest 22nm tech lmfao, that's marvellous xD

15
Rep
1,041
Offline
senior admin badge
11:59 Sep-27-2018

I did some benchmarks recently, in Geekbench, my 4.3GHz OCed i7-5820K scores higher that i7-8700K (which by default boosts to same 4.3GHz on all 6 cores max.), LOL

0

Can They Run... |

| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i7-8750H 6-Core 2.2GHz GeForce GTX 1050 8GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core 3.5GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Digital Alliance Dual 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i9-11900H 8-Core 2.10GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ultra 32GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i5-10400F 6-Core 2.90GHz Radeon RX 6600 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i3-10100 4-Core 3.60GHz GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gigabyte Windforce OC (Rev. 2.0) 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i3-10100 4-Core 3.60GHz GeForce RTX 2060 Super Gigabyte Windforce OC (Rev. 2.0) 8GB 16GB
50% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i7-4770 4-Core 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1050 MSI 2GB 8GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3050 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3050 16GB
20% No [5 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3050 16GB
100% Yes [3 votes]
Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5500U 6-Core 2.1GHz GeForce GTX 1650 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen R5 1600 Radeon RX 580 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB 16GB
25% No [4 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core 3.8GHz GeForce RTX 3090 Zotac Gaming Trinity 24GB 32GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 3050 16GB