Will We See Fewer Game Leaks After Reporting Red Dead Redemption 2 Leak Cost Site $1.3m?

Written by Jon Sutton on Sun, Nov 4, 2018 4:18 PM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

This week a sensational story broke concerning tech and gaming website Trusted Reviews. Having leaked what turned out to be pretty much spot-on info about Red Dead Redemption 2 all the way back in February of this year, Trusted Reviews were approached by Take-Two’s legal heavyweights and reached a £1 million settlement.

Now, there’s a lot to unpack in a story like this. First and foremost, £1 million is a heck of a lot of money. Game Debate would, quite simply, just die there and then if fined $1.3million. A heck of a lot of sites would suffer the same fate, outside of the massive corporate entities.

So what does this really mean to you, and to the gaming media who bring us all information about the stuff we love?

Well, let's just stop and consider what has happened in simple terms. A goliath gaming publisher didn’t like a news site finding out about, and then sharing, secrets obtained from an anonymous source with the world. The publisher strong arms with legal action. The media outlet removes the article and replaces it with an apology to the goliath game publisher.

Practically every bit of news is the world can be divided up into two categories. The first is public information such as press releases, statements and carefully choreographed reports. In the gaming industry, this is often spoon-fed by publishers and developers and boils down to free advertising for game publishers.

The other type of news is essentially the opposite - it’s whatever people or companies don’t want you to hear about, or where they don't have strict control over the details of the information that’s flowing. Without this second type of news, the news is barely news at all but instead a series of press releases. The Red Dead Redemption 2 slots straight into this second category. It’s something nobody knew, was never announced, and what Rockstar and Take-Two didn’t want us to know. Those providing the news don’t and shouldn’t care whether Take-Two wants it in the public or not. If there are no NDAs or agreements signed, all of that information is fair game.

Just to be very clear here though - an independent outlet posting information that was leaked to them is not illegal. It’s a very common thing to happen, both in games and in any industry in the world. The act of stealing the information would be illegal, so whoever provides the leaked information to a site could be in the frame. However, the journalist who is provided the information from a leaker has committed no crime and has no obligation whatsoever to protect a company’s secrets. In fact, protecting a publisher’s secrets rather than disseminating the information to the readership could be viewed as unethical.

In this particular instance with Red Dead Redemption 2, Kotaku’s Keza MacDonald suggests an issue arose because “Trusted Reviews did not do was verify the identity of the leaker or where the information came from.” Without this crucial bit of information, “nobody at Trusted Reviews knew whether this document was stolen or otherwise obtained via illicit means.”

The other big sticking point here would be if a publication had signed an NDA. This seems highly unlikely as no publication actually went hands-on with Red Dead Redemption 2 until a couple of months ago, to the best of our knowledge. If an NDA was signed though, and it was broken, then this leak could be a gross breach of that agreement and potentially open them up to a lawsuit. It’s an unlikely scenario but we can’t completely rule it out.

But, with any leak, the point of illegality is going to be different every time. If, indeed, there’s any illegality whatsoever. It’s fairly clear that a number of leaks happen intentionally. It’s a fairly standard guerrilla marketing strategy for a publisher to leak screenshots of an unannounced game, for example. However, as we’re seeing with Red Dead, not all leaks are orchestrated. A leak could come from a variety of sources, whether that’s an insider at a company who can’t keep quiet, an avoidable accident like someone peeking at your Shadow of the Tomb Raider marketing docs on the train, or even being outright stolen. Theft is a crime and would clearly be illegal, but there are many other methods within the boundaries of the law.

Whatever the case though, provided a gaming website does not obtain the information through a criminal act, there is nothing illegal about posting a leak. If your sources are tight, your info is good, and it wasn’t obtained illegally, you’re good to go. A publisher may not like it but it’s on them if they can’t keep their products locked down. To step in and legally threaten a gaming website for a game leak is a fairly extreme form of censorship. In most cases, the publisher will be too large, and have too much legal muscle, for a gaming website to even stand a chance. It’s either a lengthy legal battle (which would probably be won, eventually), a settlement, or rolling over and dying. It’s no precedent but it’s certainly a warning sign. a slippery slope that we could be about to tumble down.

However the leak was handled, it doesn’t appear as if it’s put a dent in RDR2’s success. Red Dead 2's already had the biggest opening weekend launch in entertainment history, amassing over $725 million in just three days. We also awarded it a 10/10 ‘Outstanding’ in our Red Dead Redemption 2 review, saying "Red Dead 2 isn't just a great game. It's a game that sets an impossibly high new bar for how open-worlds can be handled."

A large chunk of the games industry revolves around leaks. We get basically months of leaks leading up to E3. while a few key sites appear to have the inside loop on just about every upcoming graphics cards. The more control publishers have over this information, the less we’d know.

It would certainly be fascinating to know the truth behind this big ol’ mess but it’s unlikely to be something we’ll ever know for sure. Just don’t hold your breath for a GTA 6 leak anytime soon, as there’s bound to be a chilling effect from this legal scuffle.

Are you a fan of game leaks?

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
105
Offline
14:45 Nov-05-2018

I doubt this will happen again, or at least against a big company like rockstar itself or EA.

0
Rep
108
Offline
22:12 Nov-04-2018

Nothing really new hear except the amount of money is very large and we're actually hearing about it. People need to remember that the freedom of the press, much like the freedom of speech, is freedom from government interference not from the interference of everyone. If you publish leaked information that company has every right to pursue any legal measure against you, strong arming included.

6
Rep
108
Offline
22:18 Nov-04-2018

Of course game's journalists aren't going to like it. Most of them believe that as long as it's not illegal it's also not unethical or wrong in any way. If your actions could potentially cause a loss of profit or damage a company's IP then of course they're going to retaliate. Putting the blame on them for not protecting their stuff is like blaming a robbery victim for being robbed, grow up.

3
Rep
81
Offline
admin approved badge
05:32 Nov-05-2018

Agreed

1
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
10:33 Nov-05-2018

Publishing a story that could damage a company's profits is unethical?

0
Rep
108
Offline
17:54 Nov-05-2018

The unethical part of that comment was more pointed at the people that keep jumping to the stand by that what they're doing isn't illegal, and that makes it alright. At the very least it's rude, and you should probably expect backlash once in a while. If it wasn't unethical to release leaked material it sure wasn't unethical for Rockstar to strong arm them for having done it.

0
Rep
108
Offline
18:15 Nov-05-2018

I'm not saying game's journalists should stop doing their job. I am saying that going ahead they should probably expect more backlash for doing it. I worked for a couple of years at a newspaper and journalists get treated like sh*t all the time, and punished for their work. It's a sign that you're being taken seriously and not just looked at as games "journalists".

0
Rep
383
Offline
senior admin badge
15:36 Nov-06-2018

Sure, but I think the difference here is Trusted Reviews paid out, that's a marked change from anything we've seen before. The threat of legal action isn't anything new, ceding control to Take Two is. That's a melting of its backbone that could have big ramifications.

0
Rep
108
Offline
22:23 Nov-06-2018

I'd bet dollars to donuts that there was some backroom finagling and threats involving Take Two and the equity firm that owns TI Media, Epiris. It's obviously put the scare into some game media outlets, but I seriously doubt it's something they can repeat with other outlets. If I spent even just a little bit of time researching I bet I could tie Take Two to Epiris some way, but I won't.

0
Rep
55
Offline
21:00 Nov-04-2018

Sooo... I'm interpreting this as: "from now on, us journalists are scared of giving out any early reviews / news, due to THE MAN sticking it to us, so you won't find out any info about the game 'till launch - enjoy the pre-paid content!"
Ugh....


Or also: "we, THE MAN, will let only selected people to give-out early info about our products (with the words WE tell them to say!!!)"

1
Rep
108
Offline
22:22 Nov-04-2018

If the information they're giving out isn't enough then don't pre-order the game. Wait and see if it's any good. That's really all it takes. You don't need leaks to make informed purchases.

7
Rep
0
Offline
10:12 Nov-05-2018

Then why, in the name of all that's holy, would you be willing to pre-order, or buy on release, a pig in a poke? Just let it hit the shelves. Then make a decision.

1
Rep
11
Offline
20:18 Nov-04-2018

This sets a very dangerous precedent.

1
Rep
3
Offline
19:06 Nov-04-2018

i mean it's fine if it was a low end unknown website or sth but it was a well established site i just don't get why such a site did sth like this :|

-4
Rep
3
Offline
19:07 Nov-04-2018

these leaks helps the games in a way but i think it should be the publishers choice if they want to hype up the market like this

-4
Rep
108
Offline
22:21 Nov-04-2018

I don't understand anything you just said, and I really don't see how leak help these games any. There's at least a chance some people didn't buy the game because they heard there was inclusion of a Battle Royale in online and that was enough to sour it for them, Battle Royale being over rated af and being shoehorned into everything these days.

2
Rep
96
Offline
admin approved badge
17:14 Nov-04-2018

That site must be downright retarded to value a good relation to Rockstar at $1.3M!
No way in hell having your review online 1 day before game release can generate that kind of money.

2

Can They Run... |

Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 2070 Gigabyte Windforce 8GB 16GB
Ryzen 7 5800H 8-Core 3.2GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core 3.8GHz GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA FTW3 Ultra Gaming 8GB 32GB
66.6667% Yes [3 votes]
| 60FPS, Low, 720p
APU A8-7410 Quad-Core Radeon R5 7410 8GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i5-11400 6-Core 2.7GHz GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 8GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1080 MSI Gaming X 8GB Edition 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]