Nvidia CEO Says Radeon VII is 'Underwhelming' and 'Lousy', 'They Thought of it This Morning'

Written by Stuart Thomas on Thu, Jan 10, 2019 2:43 PM

AMD is understandably proud of its new flagship Radeon VII GPU, a new high-end competitor to Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2080. Nvidia head honcho Jensen Huang isn’t having any of it though, delivering a series of withering put-downs in regards to his competitor’s new graphics card.

“It’s underwhelming,” said Huang during a chat with PC World, bluntly attempting to knock a $699 graphics card off its pedestal. While you can see the full specs here, the Radeon VII is the world’s first 7nm gaming graphics card, featuring 13.8 TFLOPS of performance and 16GB HBM2 delivering 1TB/s memory bandwidth.

But Huang’s savagery knows no bounds. “It’s a weird launch, maybe they thought of it this morning,” he continued.

“The performance is lousy and there’s nothing new. No ray tracing, no AI. It’s 7nm with HBM memory that barely keeps up with a GeForce RTX 2080. And if we turn on DLSS we’ll crush it. And if we turn on ray tracing we’ll crush it.”

Phwoar. Takedown. Are these the words of a man under threat, or basking in arrogance? We’ll leave that to you to decide. It is also, of course, worth pointing out that Jensen Huang will have never actually seen the Radeon VII before and won’t be any wiser than anybody else as to how it performs.

AMD Radeon VII Flagship GPU Revealed. 16GB HBM2, 1TB Memory Bandwidth - First Benchmarks

PC World tried to get this thing going full Jerry Springer as well, asking AMD CEO Lisa Su her thoughts on what Jensen had said. “What I would say is that we’re very excited about Radeon VII, and I would probably suggest that he hasn’t seen it yet,” said Su.

What do you reckon then, is Jensen Huang right to be confidently boasting? Or do you think he’s worried about AMD’s 7nm progress and the undercutting of the RTX 2080? Let us know below!

Source

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
3
Offline
05:33 Jan-14-2019

I am a Nvidia fan although I also lost respect for Nvidia. I think if ray-tracing was a success (which in my opinion it wasn't), then they could have argued the new AMD GPU lacks. I think AMD delivered a strong competitor at a lower price.

0
Rep
1
Offline
10:03 Jan-13-2019

As we were going to stop every two seconds to admire the RTX technologie :/

2
Rep
5
Offline
06:59 Jan-12-2019

Very unprofessional, lost some respect for Nvidia.

0
Rep
28
Offline
11:00 Jan-12-2019

never respect a company they see you as a number/profit. But you can love a companies product. Every company has good/bad products its up to you to buy what you see as a product you will be satisfied with. bottom line brand loyalty is dumb, buy a good product not the name behind the product.

6
Rep
5
Offline
21:37 Jan-12-2019

I have no brand loyalties, in fact my GPU is from AMD, I have no loyalty to AMD, my CPU is Intel. I find it childish and disrespectful to AMD for Nvidia to slate their products, be professional and allow your product to talk for you. Do you ever see Apple slate Samsung? No, the iPhone is the most successful and Apple lets it speak for itself as all companies should do. Maybe I am overthinking it with having a job where the brand image is very strictly a professional one, but I would have thought Nvidia would prefer to have a professional brand image

0
Rep
95
Offline
14:35 Jan-13-2019

Just my 2cents:
I agree that brand fanboyism is just nonsensical.
But there should be "loyalty" in the sense that companies who treat their customers right should be rewarded by a certain amount of loyalty. Otherwise we are just encouraging them to think short term, hence all the ****ty treatment we get from a lot of them.

2
Rep
28
Offline
17:34 Jan-13-2019

We have laws in place so that companies dont run over us. And the purpose of a company is to make money (your money). If they sh*t on their costumer then the costumers will just go looking for alternatives.

0
Rep
95
Offline
18:16 Jan-13-2019

I dont disagree with what you said, though I'm not sure how it relates to my post.

1
Rep
-13
Offline
01:57 Jan-12-2019

so disappointed with AMD

0
Rep
31
Offline
11:36 Jan-15-2019

Why, because they have Navi on the way?

0
Rep
41
Offline
12:08 Jan-11-2019

This gpu generation is a definite skip, over priced cards with underdeveloped technology.

9
Rep
191
Offline
junior admin badge
13:57 Jan-12-2019

Ditto

2
Rep
5
Offline
04:39 Jan-13-2019

same seems like repeat And some the stuff dino 131 said very disappointing

1
Rep
111
Offline
admin approved badge
01:19 Jan-14-2019

yeah pretty garbage all around! I was so sad when they announced the price of the radeon 7 without announcing the 3000 series of Ryzen. I was so hyped for AMD keynote at CES and i feel like i got a cold bath after the keynote was over. Sad freaking day.

1
Rep
116
Offline
09:18 Jan-14-2019

GPU was a bust but that CPU they showed actually has me very, very excited. That keynote certainly wasn't a bad one for me.

0
Rep
31
Offline
11:37 Jan-15-2019

It's always the same nowadays.

0
Rep
23
Offline
10:12 Jan-11-2019

In truth I have absolutely no respect for nvidia for years now. Their practices, lies, and arrogance places them among the guys like ea, activision, ubisoft, etc...I'd put konami here but they are just outright dumb and worthless, not evil.

2
Rep
7
Offline
09:21 Jan-11-2019

I also used the word "underwhelming" when I saw the launch of the Radeon VII. Right now, it IS pretty underwhelming, but we will see the benchmarks

1
Rep
28
Offline
16:27 Jan-11-2019

amd has finally caught with 03.2017 gtx 1080 ti took them 2 years and 7nm AND still power draw is still 50w higher(250w vs 300w?)

1
Rep
116
Offline
16:45 Jan-11-2019

TDP is not power draw. It measures heat production. Power draw is probably around 220 to 250 watts.

0
Rep
28
Offline
17:14 Jan-11-2019

if its anything like vega its gonna draw a f*ck load of power ffs it has a triple fan cooler

1
Rep
116
Offline
17:21 Jan-11-2019

If I know correctly, Vega 64 is limited to 220W without tinkering with it. So I think Radeon VII is around the same.

0
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
17:27 Jan-11-2019

I do wonder about the physics behind your statement where you get more heat from a lower power draw. Usually it's the other way around...

0
Rep
116
Offline
17:32 Jan-11-2019

Yes it is. I am basing this on second hand reports from people I know used or use Vega cards. So I guess I should say not to take what I said as a fact. But If I'm correct, from what they've said, they have been tinkering with those GPUs to reduce the power consumption.

0
Rep
28
Offline
17:47 Jan-11-2019

looking at these(https://www.anandtech.com/show/11717/the-amd-radeon-rx-vega-64-and-56-review/19) benchmarks. Vega 64 is drawing 100w more then gtx 1080ti and i doubt the new vega has same/lower power consumption(the 3 fan tells us that it might need it)

0
Rep
116
Offline
17:55 Jan-11-2019

It's a curious issue. As far as I understood, Vega 64 and 56 were basically overclocked to no end to try to squeeze as much performance as is possible. Just lowering the clock around 100Mhz dramatically reduces power consumption at a negligible loss of just a few FPS. That's how I've been told.
Now I don't know if that's the situation with Radeon VII, but I've searched the internet and AMD seems to say it eats around 280W. If you can tinker that I don't know.

0
Rep
2
Offline
02:36 Jan-11-2019

Just release it then.
So we can compare which is the best, price per performance wise.

0
Rep
50
Offline
01:10 Jan-11-2019

there is a fine line between being salty and whining, this is more towards the later than the former

3
Rep
28
Offline
16:29 Jan-11-2019

really strange huang just talking sh*t for some reason like AMD has been doing great in the high end gpu market(i bet he would love amd under cutting their rtx 2080ti by like $100)

0
Rep
9
Offline
00:25 Jan-11-2019

Its just the brat that is Nvidia trying to be anti-competitive again. With the proprietary Gameworks and Gsync now being crushed, I was wondering if they had actually started to learn. We will see.

0
Rep
5
Offline
00:33 Jan-11-2019

G-Sync and Gameworks crushed? Gameworks is still up in full force and AMD was stupid enough not to do anything with Freesync tech and they let Nvidia take over that branding and change it to G-Sync.

2
Rep
5
Offline
00:34 Jan-11-2019

Monitors aren't Freesync anymore, they're G-Sync compatible now. And I believe that a clear victory for Nvidia there.

3
Rep
61
Offline
admin approved badge
17:09 Jan-11-2019

Wait a second. Did I miss something ? Have monitor manufacturers said they're not using the term FreeSync anymore ? And using G-Sync / G-Sync compatible instead ?
Because if not, this is just Nvidia marketing strategy. Saying FreeSync monitors will be G-Sync compatible is the same as saying Nvidia GPUs will learn to work with FreeSync, no ?
If AMD did a Nvidia, they could say their tech being open allowed Nvidia to make their GPUs compatible - FreeSync compatible Nvidia GPUs

0
Rep
18
Offline
06:56 Jan-11-2019

Gameworks is awesome when it works perfectly i'll give you that but thats only possible with a crazy powered GPU+I dont know of any new game coming out with Gameworks. Nvidia is obviously gonna prioritize DLSS and Ray Tracing now

1
Rep
5
Offline
14:10 Jan-11-2019

Almost every Nvidia optimized title uses some Gameworks features. They've just decided to just not make a fuss about it anymore and keep it silent.

0
Rep
28
Offline
16:31 Jan-11-2019

more like it was a pain in the ass for the developer to shove in their game and no one used it...(even if you could you would take quite the performance hit)

0
Rep
58
Offline
admin approved badge
11:37 Jan-11-2019

So far freesync was a positive term, nvidia just made most of them appear negative for not being compatible with gsync

0
Rep
5
Offline
14:11 Jan-11-2019

That frankly is AMDs fault. They should've done more with their FreeSync brand. They've practically lost it now and let Nvidia get away with it too.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
15:21 Jan-11-2019

Nvidia didn't win that adaptive sync battle at all. They lost and had to concede to going to lower price and make this generation and the previous compatible. Because their premium priced product wasn't selling as they had hoped and their arrogance finally came back to but them. What they are doing now is damage control as they are being sued by their own investors.

0
Rep
116
Offline
15:43 Jan-11-2019

But AMD still lost their FreeSync brand in here. Monitor manufacturers are now going to work closer with Nvidia to ensure G-Sync functionality on their products, which considering how Nvidia rolls, is most probably going to earn us, the consumers, another Green tax in the future on Adaptive Sync tech we've had for free so far. G-Sync was a brand which was, until now, connected with exclusivity and premium features, which is a better selling point than FreeSync is.

1
Rep
116
Offline
15:45 Jan-11-2019

Whether Nvidia won or lost doesn't matter because they practically ensured that their brand, G-Sync, will be applied over FreeSync to most of, if not possibly all, Adaptive Sync monitors in the future. Damage control or not, AMD slipped, again, and let Nvidia's more competent marketing team take their credits from them. So I have to agree, it is AMD's fault that they didn't do more to build up the FreeSync brand in order to stop this from happening.

1
Rep
116
Offline
15:52 Jan-11-2019

I've always loved AMD's more open approach to developing software and technology by making it open source and giving everyone else the chance to use and utilize it how they see fit. But to be fair, doing that constantly ends up hurting AMD, because they let those tools into the wild and don't do anything besides that. Lack of quality control from AMD on FreeSync monitors is what lead to G-Sync now practically taking over their branding.

1
Rep
116
Offline
15:55 Jan-11-2019

Due to that lack of quality control AMD failed to do, FreeSync monitors are now considered lesser ones compared to G-Sync, even though, when done right and properly, they are practically nearly identical. We even see that now. Some of the best FreeSync monitors have earned the G-Sync brand meaning that Nvidia considers them equal to their premium technology.

1
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
20:24 Jan-11-2019

first of all, amd didnt slip up. nvidia is doing damage control to creep over amd because of the situation they are in and taking the heat off of what is going on with them.
second, there will not be an applied premium to all freesync monitors. part of their draw is a lower price for a wider audience. that is why nvidia had to concede to being freesync compatible. until stuff starts hitting the market, people need to calm down. just because nvidia is the bully doesnt mean the other companies will bow to them. nvidia played the game and lost on their bet. hence the freesync compatibility.

0
Rep
116
Offline
21:32 Jan-11-2019

Do you remember GPP per chance? Just a couple of OEMs could afford not to give in to those ludicrous demands while others had to bow their heads in shame and accept that disagreeing could probably lose them a lot of business. Nvidia is a massive player. We've already seen how they play, and it ain't clean. That lawsuit is probably not gonna get anywhere, and even if it does I doubt it'll be a serious issue for Nvidia.

0
Rep
116
Offline
21:32 Jan-11-2019

AMD slipped up. Believe me, I'm the last person wanting ill to AMD, but I'm not oblivious to their mistakes nor will I defend them if I know it's their fault. Big draw of FreeSync was that it's cheaper. Anyone wanting a comparable adaptive sync technology for their Nvidia GPUs had to pay a hefty premium. A premium that doesn't exist anymore.

0
Rep
116
Offline
21:33 Jan-11-2019

Meaning that you're not locked to AMD GPU for FreeSync, something which was undoubtedly driving a percentage of AMDs sales. It was only a matter of time until Nvidia were to accept FreeSync, but the way they have done it is a brilliant marketing move which will probably end up hurting AMD more than Nvidia for crossing to FreeSync.

0
Rep
116
Offline
21:33 Jan-11-2019

Nvidia is not FreeSync compatible. They quite literally never mentioned FreeSync in their presentations or stage shows. As far as they're aware, those monitors are G-Sync compatible, and not FreeSync compatible. And the way tech press is reporting that, they're not wrong.
FreeSync is not going away, but G-Sync is going over it.

0
Rep
116
Offline
21:34 Jan-11-2019

One thing Nvidia always had over AMD is their downright brilliant marketing team. Nvidia could quite literally sell people a box of literal sh*t in such a way that people are happy to have it, and that is something I have to commend them for.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
21:51 Jan-11-2019

you are being over the top delisuision. the gsync you are so hopelessly fearing is nothing. there is three (3) different tiers of gsync and the bottom two are freesync monitors. the literal bottom os the pool is called "gsync comptible" and that means they are nvidia gpu adaptive sync compliant. nothing more. the second tier is essentially the premium end up the freesync monitors and the top tier (gsync ultimate) is the just current gsync monitors, gsync chip included. the other two tiers do not have the chip and are software updated with the monitors timing to for the nvidia gpus to recognize the connection.
this absurd nvidia driven futire you are proclaiming is not coming.

-2
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
21:53 Jan-11-2019

your complete lack of knowledge is showing in your refusal to see anything outside of a few shortsighted articles you have read.
next time make sure you read everything and you continue to research before blasting about some inevitable skynet-like future that isn't even coming.
i literally posted the facts in the comments concerning the article about nvidia gpus being freesync compliant. that is how it was presented and that's how it is acknowledged. nvidia didnt roll over amd. they had to make their stuff compliant because they are loosing. i dont care how he said it, the articles being posted are they have to concede to amd's tech because theirs wasn't competitive.
gpp failed. fast.

-1
Rep
116
Offline
22:00 Jan-11-2019

No need to be so aggressive and insulting. I've been dabbling with tech and PCs over the last 17 years and I'm pretty sure I managed to pick up on the way these stuff usually work out.
I'm not fearing G-Sync, I'm just frustrated at AMD for letting Nvidia just take over their brand by just rolling over and not doing anything with it practically since it was released. I guess we'll see what will happen in the future, but I'd bet I'm not far off.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
22:06 Jan-11-2019

you keep regurgitating the same thing over and over. you keep missing the simple facts that were missed in the article posted here. i tried to inform you but you keep shooting down the facts im telling you. so now i stand up and tell you how it is. freesync is going away. there will be dual branding such as "freesync monitor - gsync compatible" which is not amd rolling over. the marketing of the monitors will not change much because they will want to make sure they can get as many customers as possible and going to a single specific branding for one gpu means they miss out on a whole other customer base.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
22:12 Jan-11-2019

you talk about nvidia's marketing beating amd's but nvidia had to concede to amd. who had to become compliant to the other's brand? nvidia didn't win anything. even their marketing about having to test each monitor made them sound like idiots to the press and the press slammed them for it. the original 12 monitors are nothing other than marketing because their press release talks about how all freesync monitors will work with their gpus when the option is enabled in the settings. they got slammed for that too.
amd is being praised because their tech is farther reaching than nvidia would like it to be known and nvidia had to acknowledge it by becoming compliant to the tech.

0
Rep
9
Offline
21:48 Jan-11-2019

To clear this up a bit, I was saying that Gameworks and somewhat Gsync are no longer Nvidia only, aka proprietary, aka anti-competitive. (like GPP was, lol) Its the same reason why Freesync > Gsync, Vulkan > DX12, Unreal Engine > Frostbite, etc.

0
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
23:01 Jan-10-2019

The problem of Vega VII is that it is still a Vega. It has same MSRP as 2080, it performs about the same, 1FPS isn't a lot better. They used thermal and power budget for higher clock, it still is hot and hungry with 300W. So I might as well get 2080, run cooler and get RTX and DLSS, even if I don't need them.

2
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
23:02 Jan-10-2019

It is just disappointing and that card really gets hurt by having overkill amount of HBM2, which is extremely expensive, instead of making gamer version with GDDR6 and sell it cheaper. It is just hiking overblown nVidia RTX taxed prices, and if we ever get 2080 without RTX premium, that would kill Vega VII.

0
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
23:04 Jan-10-2019

It basically is same old same old and that makes it boring product. Plus we don't even know actual prices. Vega56/64 had great MSRP, before we learned that it was with rebate, which expired on release and price jumped up instantly. And even at same price, I would just get 2080.

0
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
23:06 Jan-10-2019

Not that I consider 2080 good value and I definitely don't like it, but even at bad value, it is better than Vega VII. As much as I am not fan of Jensen, I also can't find any good defense for Vega VII, except maybe as workstation card and that is not interesting for gamer like me.

1
Rep
28
Offline
16:34 Jan-11-2019

hbm2 is implemented because of the massive power draw vega architecture demands

0
Rep
116
Offline
23:09 Jan-10-2019

Vega is a workstation card. Adding GDDR memory would require them to redesign their memory controllers, and considering Vega is an old architecture, I guess they didn't want to spend R&D money redesigning that. Due to the overabundance of HBM memory this card is probably selling close to it's even point, so slashing the price is probably not in the plans.
If you ask me, they should've never made Vega into a gaming card, period. Waste of resources for little gain.

2
Rep
18
Offline
07:01 Jan-11-2019

yeah i totally get your point. Vega for gamer's has been a serious let down. maybe an rx 380/480/580 but with 4k in mind would have worked out. i'm guessing thats what Navi is as its designed with consoles in mind

0
Rep
95
Offline
22:16 Jan-10-2019

Well considering where nvidia GPUs are at, there is a pretty low bar for beating it in price to performance. And considering the lack of enthusiasm for Radeon7, it wouldnt be a stretch to say that it was, in fact, underwhelming...

4
Rep
12
Offline
22:28 Jan-10-2019

I believe this is a strategic move of AMD to beat Nvidia with Navi.Why they would else release a high end gpu that most of the people won't buy?I think their move was to make Nvidia underestimate AMD.

-4
Rep
116
Offline
22:57 Jan-10-2019

For the last 5+ years Nvidia didn't consider AMD a threat, so there's not much to underestimate from their side. They wouldn't release a GPU expecting no one to buy it, that's just the waste of money, and AMD is pretty much the one which can't afford to waste money.

0
Rep
28
Offline
16:38 Jan-11-2019

YES AMD used who knows how much money to develop this gpu for what...to make nvidia underestimate them...well if they wanted to do that they would have just saved their money and release nothing. Your argument makes no logical sense.

0
Rep
12
Offline
22:31 Jan-10-2019

So they can release cheap gpus with great performance making people buy their gpus.Many people didn't bought the new rtx gpus because of their price. If they they had announced yesterday the navi gpus probably nvidia would lower their price

-1
Rep
109
Offline
00:18 Jan-11-2019

Vega VII are not cheap, its like buying a RTX 2080 without RTX and DLSS but without any discount for lack of features. It would be more correct to compare Vega VII to 1080 ti, only difference you have to pay more for 3 year old performance.
Turing have a terrible price/performance ratio, but Vega VII is even worse.
I predict navi would give 2080 ti performance way too late for a even higher price. AMD GPUs are no longer cheap, unfortunally

1
Rep
5
Offline
00:36 Jan-11-2019

Unlike Nvidia, AMD's GPUs aren't cheap to produce, that's why they aren't cheap to buy. Nvidia on the other hand has a massive Green tax on their GPUs. You're paying to have the brand now, not the product.

0
Rep
5
Offline
00:37 Jan-11-2019

They turned us around, spread our ass cheeks wide open and plunged their long green co*k so deep it came out our mouth and round again. Nvidia is ***ing us relentlessly and we're gladly accepting and even wanting for it. FCK ME JENSEN !

0
Rep
132
Offline
21:51 Jan-10-2019

The Radeon VII is just a renamed Instinct MI50 (they match exactly in specs) so it's a pro card, dressed up as a gaming card.


A bit lazy from AMD granted, but what that tells me is that Navi isn't ready yet, or they simply aren't ready to show it yet, so they showed the "first ever" 7nm gaming GPU.


Whether Navi is meant to compete at the very top, or mid range is yet to be seen.

4
Rep
12
Offline
22:21 Jan-10-2019

I think that navi is quite ready but they need to make final adjustments. Besides that I think they have a strategic move against Nvidia.I think they released Radeon VII to make Nvidia feel like they have the upper hand.

-3
Rep
116
Offline
22:59 Jan-10-2019

If Navi were ready they certainly would've said something. If we don't see nor hear anything about Navi in these 3 months than it's highly likely that Navi run into trouble and is going to be late. Nvidia has the upper hand and they've had it for years now. Mentioning Navi would've had them shaking, but as it stands now, they clearly left the CES victorious.

2
Rep
28
Offline
16:41 Jan-11-2019

its not like AMD has high end gpus lying around on the ground...

1
Rep
12
Offline
22:25 Jan-10-2019

AMD wants also from people to buy the RX 590 because if the rumors are true and the RX 3060 has 1060 level of performance for 130$ then there is no point for AMD to sell the 590 for 280$

0
Rep
154
Offline
admin approved badge
21:10 Jan-10-2019

Jensen literally looks like a BJJ sensei I once had.

0
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
21:02 Jan-10-2019

First of all, shut up Jenson.


Second of all, we are still not ready for Ray-Tracing. DLSS is great and all but it's not enough ok.


You've bumped up the price so much with the RTX 20 series.

8
Rep
191
Offline
junior admin badge
10:44 Jan-11-2019

Agreed

0
Rep
28
Offline
16:44 Jan-11-2019

hey jenson your 2 games with RTX/DSLL dont make a great argument

0
Rep
12
Offline
20:50 Jan-10-2019

Yeah right nvidia you will crush it with ray tracing which gives you half the performance with ray tracing enabled.As for AI and dlss, they are good but people better and cheaper gpus with feutures they may actually use.

0
Rep
12
Offline
20:53 Jan-10-2019

Personally I wouldn't buy a radeon vii because I could just buy a vega 64 and overclock it. I think he is right thought about amd's weird launch.

1
Rep
12
Offline
20:55 Jan-10-2019

The Radeon VII is great for proffesional use and enthusiast level but not for normal gamers.They should have shown us something about navi,after all this is what amd fans are most excited not Vega

0
Rep
12
Offline
21:04 Jan-10-2019

As for the ryzen 3000 it was preety cool 8c/16 threads competing with i9 9900K it was nice but I'm kinda dissapointed that they didn't say if it was ryzen 3600(x) or 3700(x). Based on the leaks it's either 3600 or 3600x.

1
Rep
12
Offline
21:06 Jan-10-2019

That will be awesome because for under 250$ we will get i9 9900k level of performace for less power consumption,that will destroy intel.

0
Rep
18
Offline
admin approved badge
19:15 Jan-10-2019

AMD still has NAVI to go, this is a VEGA GPU and probably something they had just in case NAVI didn't work so they had something.
It's not specifically for gamers and was targeted at content creators.
NAVI is what the 'too good to be true' leaks were referring to so I'll wait for that before I make any judgement.

0
Rep
18
Offline
admin approved badge
19:17 Jan-10-2019

But since RADEON VII doesn't have the extra tensor cores and ray-tracing they should have priced it much lower than the 2080.
Maybe it's to create a bigger splash with low NAVI prices? Or my GPU budget is going to have to increase...

0
Rep
116
Offline
19:45 Jan-10-2019

HBM memory is really expensive, so I don't think they actually could have priced it much lower than 2080 while still making profit.

2
Rep
18
Offline
admin approved badge
17:14 Jan-11-2019

Then why have so much?
Surely they could've made a 'gamer' card that's cheaper with less VRAM.

0
Rep
116
Offline
17:25 Jan-11-2019

Because Vega is a professional card, not a gaming one. Why AMD decided to call it a gaming card is beyond me. As it stands, Radeon VII is a poor value for consumers, and not a particularly good choice overall unless you specifically need a use for HBM memory.
Now, why didn't them make one with less memory, I don't know. Performance wouldn't suffer that much and it could've been cheaper.

0
Rep
28
Offline
17:50 Jan-11-2019

Vega was marketed as both which seems to be a problem they cant decide who this card is for.

0
Rep
83
Offline
18:20 Jan-10-2019

Isnt most of the 16gb going to be a waste of space?
If lets say the new amd gpu is on par with the rtx 2080, well my rtx 2080 cant run all newer games at 60fps and 4k when a game is on max settings, even 2k can be a struggle, so what is all the 16gb vram going to do if the card aint even powerful enough to push 60fps min, id say 16gb was just overkill to make the card look better than what it is

2
Rep
12
Offline
22:34 Jan-10-2019

It's not a waste if it is intended for professional use

0
Rep
12
Offline
23:15 Jan-10-2019

The marketed it for gamers tho. She said multiple times its a gaming card.
If she just said its a workstation card for professional use, nobody would have a problem with it

2
Rep
21
Offline
17:51 Jan-10-2019

seeing vega uArch can go upto 4096SP, and this one having only 3840, I will say a bigger brother is coming shortly to take on the 2080ti.

0
Rep
21
Offline
17:35 Jan-10-2019

it doesn't have ray tracing and dlss? by the way how games does support those features which rtx cards are capable of?

1

Can They Run... |

Core i3-8145U 2-Core 2.1GHz UHD Graphics 620 24GB
Core 2 Duo E7200 2.53GHz GeForce 210 2GB
| 30FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i7-7500U 2-Core 2.7GHz GeForce 940MX 2GB 8GB
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1440p
Core i9-9900K 8-Core 3.6GHz GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 64GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 720p
Core i3-4130 3.4GHz Radeon HD 6970 4GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| Low,
Pentium Dual Core E5200 2.5GHz Intel G41 Express Chipset 2GB
Core i7-10700K 8-Core 3.8GHz GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA FTW3 Ultra Gaming 8GB 32GB
| Low, 720p
FX-8350 GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition 16GB
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i5-7400 3.0GHz Radeon RX 590 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core 3.9GHz Radeon RX 470 Sapphire Nitro+ 8GB 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-11800H 8-Core 1.90GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 64GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-11800H 8-Core 1.90GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 64GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 7 3750H 4-Core 2.3 GHz GeForce GTX 1650 8GB
Ryzen 7 3750H 4-Core 2.3 GHz GeForce GTX 1650 8GB
| 30FPS, Low, 720p
Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core 3.7GHz GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA FTW3 Ultra Gaming 8GB 16GB
Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core 3.7GHz GeForce RTX 3080 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 10GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-10300H 4-Core 2.50GHz GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 16GB
0% No [1 votes]
Core i5-3360M 2.8GHz Radeon HD 7570M 8GB
Core i5-9400F 6-Core 2.9GHz GeForce GTX 750 Ti Zotac 2GB Edition 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz Radeon RX 5700 PowerColor Red Dragon 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]