Up For Debate - One year on from Battlefield V's reveal, where next for Battlefield?

Written by Jon Sutton on Sat, May 25, 2019 4:10 PM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

It’s now been exactly one year since Battlefield V was revealed to the world. It was a fateful date for the franchise, kickstarting a turbulent few months of bizarre controversies that clouded any genuine issues. A faction of the net ended up so distracted by a few cosmetic elements that talk of the actual game fell by the wayside.

Fast forward one year and Battlefield V is now seven months old. It featured arguably the strongest core in a Battlefield title since Battlefield 3, but all those predictions that the lack of a Premium Pass would lead to a lack of post-launch content certainly bore fruit. At the time of writing, BFV has received just a single Conquest map since launch. The community has long been riled. Not even the biggest pessimist thought we’d get one new map in the last 198 days.

Instead, we’ve been given the divisive Firestorm battle royale mode, as well as weekly updates with a handful of new weapons and cycling game modes to try and keep things fresh. There’s no arguing that Battlefield V is lighter on content than practically every Battlefield before it though, and the lack of a Premium Pass is probably a strong reason for this.

The flipside is, well, map packs suck. They splinter the community into the haves and the have nots. DLC server playlists run the risk of becoming dead within weeks. Free maps post-launch, funded by cosmetics, is the accepted middle ground that keeps the player base healthy and active. It’s a template that works, as Overwatch and Rainbow Six Siege can attest. The one proviso of this system is that said new content does come. In the case of Battlefield V it simply hasn’t, for now at least.

It’s all meant that Battlefield 5 has taken a bit of a battering. This could all change soon enough if DICE suddenly announces a torrent of maps and new factions coming our way, but it looks like a shrinking possibility when it’s taken almost 200 days to give us just 1. Which is a shame because, despite all of that, Battlefield V is a very competent shooter and the strongest base for the franchise in many a year. Changes to the class systems, squad revives, lower TTD, and fortifications are all for the better when compared to Battlefield 1. The less said about Battlefield 4, the better. I went back and played it for a few hours this weekend just gone to refresh myself. It’s an absolute mess of poor enemy visuals, overly chaotic map design, overkill on AA weaponry, and spawns thats are all over the place. In that sense, the Battlefield franchise is getting back on track, albeit thrown a curveball thanks to the dreadful Battlefield V post-launch support.

Crucially though, Battlefield V clearly hasn’t sold that well. EA has admitted this outing has been a disappointment. So where next for one of the most beloved multiplayer shooter franchises of all time?

Well, there are two obviously viable routes forward - Battlefield 6 and Battlefield Bad Company 3. However you want to shake it, modern warfare seems all but guaranteed. I’d prefer just about anything historical, to be honest, but the thirst for another modern Battlefield is certainly real. Bad Company was a turning point for the series, particularly when it began to attain widespread appeal on consoles. Going with Bad Company 3 would essentially wash away the taint that currently affects the core franchise and could well get the fans back on board.

Whatever DICE does with the Battlefield franchise next though, it is absolutely crucial that it launches with plenty of content and game modes. It’s also going to be preferable that all post-launch gameplay content is free, and that DICE is actually allowed the time and money to create a bucketload of additional content. While we’re at - sack off the single-player campaign too. Battlefield never used to have a campaign and it’s certainly never had a great campaign. Drive those resources into more multiplayer content rather than single-player.

And one final point - I think it’s about time EA and DICE abandoned the two-year development cycle for Battlefield. It’s clearly not enough and it desperately shows. There needs to a minimum of three years between each Battlefield game. This means more content at launch for each game, and also a longer lifespan.

So enough of my waffling because I could go on about this franchise. What we want to know is what are your thoughts for the future of the Battlefield franchise? Which game should DICE develop next, and how should they do it differently?

Which game would you prefer next?

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
-17
Offline
18:26 May-26-2019

I hope EA remembered their last year's medicine. If they don't. They will flop again and lose tons of money! Yet I wonder, Who is gonna be the next battlefield sponsor?

0
Rep
58
Offline
17:14 May-26-2019

Why isn't None an option? I'm prety sure there are those who refuse to buy another BF game after the last one.

0
Rep
386
Offline
admin approved badge
10:48 May-26-2019

Well since they are going hronologically by major history war event, I'd say the Korean war? And then Vietnam? They can also fit the Malayan Emergency war before the Korean one and Second Indochina War between the Korean and Vietnam War, but those two aren't very popular so I doubt it. Then Central American Crysis, then the Congo Crisis(I would really like this one), North Yemen Civil War, Soviet–Afghan War, Afghan Civil War.


I think all those are notable and could be a theme, but obviously the Korean and Vietnam wars are most popular since Americans made them the most popular ones.

2
Rep
386
Offline
admin approved badge
10:48 May-26-2019

Or maybe the Pacific front in WW2, that would be cool too.

0
Rep
5
Offline
09:37 May-26-2019

I would love to see bad company 3, as long as it is a real sequel to bad company 1 story. Not another bull_____ story that bad company 2 had.

0
Rep
28
Offline
08:59 May-26-2019

I just want battlefield to go back to modern weapons battlefield 3 was amazing

0
Rep
61
Offline
admin approved badge
05:21 May-26-2019

I see how y'all rollin - everybody wants a BBC eh


That's Battlefield Bad Company obviously. What were you thinking

1
Rep
2
Offline
04:51 May-26-2019

Pirates.

0
Rep
-4
Offline
23:30 May-25-2019

I only want BC3 if its comparable to BC2 quality wise, if there's no BC3 pls no generic Modern Warfare shooter again, I enjoy historical settings more than the 6 billionth MW like game. A new BF in Vietnam would be awesome, too.

2
Rep
164
Offline
23:00 May-25-2019

i am waiting for battlefield bad company 3 on pc.
peace.

0
Rep
34
Offline
20:49 May-25-2019

Battlefield 2143, basically anything except this boring WW1-2 theme... AND with Premium Pass. I knew this free content would mean light or boring content.

0
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
19:10 May-25-2019

Battlefield 6 Mobile Edition? :-D Jokes aside, I wouldn't be surprised if EA pushed it for mobile. But in more serious note, there were rumors about Bad Company 3 being in development. While it might be false, I would say it is most likely that. Hopefully it will be return to big maps and less direct action,...

0
Rep
76
Offline
admin approved badge
19:12 May-25-2019

... like it was with predecessors. Since there was a lot of complaining about COD styled action. Also considering all monetization, I wonder if EA was thinking about making base multiplayer they monetize free to play and add rest as paid DLC, which I think would work better for EAs style of making games.

0
Rep
70
Offline
18:01 May-25-2019

Personally i would like a Battlefield in the current modern era style again. I don't really like the WW1/WW2 stuff anymore.

1
Rep
-4
Offline
23:27 May-25-2019

Why don't you play BF4 then?

0
Rep
70
Offline
09:54 May-26-2019

Because that game is 6 years old, and mostly died on PC. I want a new fresh game, different maps, better graphics etc.

2
Rep
4
Offline
admin approved badge
17:49 May-25-2019

less politics and more action

4
Rep
94
Offline
16:35 May-25-2019

As long as BF doesn't become the new COD, which imo kinda is when BF1 and BF5 got released. It is too close to the BF4 game style in terms of mechanics. I know it's difficult to improve something good, but it just feels like you're playing the same game in a different skin.

1

Can They Run... |

Ryzen 5 3500U 4-Core 2.1 GHz Radeon RX Vega 8 8GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 720p
Ryzen 5 3500U 4-Core 2.1 GHz Radeon RX Vega 8 10GB
| 30FPS, High, 1080p
Core i3-8100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Ryzen 7 5800H 8-Core 3.2GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 32GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 7 5800H 8-Core 3.2GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz GeForce GTX 980 4GB 32GB
100% Yes [3 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 7 5800H 8-Core 3.2GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
Core i5-10400F 6-Core 2.90GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ti MSI Ventus 2X 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [5 votes]
| 60FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i7-10700F 8-Core 2.9GHz GeForce GTX 970 Gigabyte G1 Gaming 4GB Edition 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i5-11400F 6-Core 2.6GHz GeForce GTX 1650 Super 4GB 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-3770 4-Core 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1650 Super 4GB 16GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz GeForce GTX 980 4GB 32GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 7 5800H 8-Core 3.2GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Xeon E3-1230 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gigabyte G1 Gaming 4GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]