Red Dead Redemption 2 Low vs Ultra Graphics Comparison

Written by Jon Sutton on Tue, Nov 5, 2019 5:05 PM
System Requirements Optimum 1080p PC Build Low vs Ultra Screenshots GPU Performance Chart CPU List That Meet System Requirements GPU List That Meet System Requirements

Actually getting Red Dead Redemption 2 up and running has been a bit of a logistical nightmare (and we are not alone) but we've done it, sort of. Well, Felix managed to get it running anyway, so he's been busy dipping his toes into the PC version of Red Dead Redemption 2 and snatched some early Low vs Ultra RDR2 comparison screenshots.

These screengrabs have been pulled from Red Dead Redemption 2's in-game benchmark tool. We used a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070, comparing the visual quality between Low and Ultra (or Performance vs Quality) graphics presets. All you need to do is slide your cursor across and you can compare the visuals! 

Red Dead Redemption 2 Low v Ultra Graphics Comparison  

Red Dead Redemption 2 is either a fantastic looking game or, well, a whole lot of ugly depending on the graphics settings you settle on. Rockstar has at least provided a vast number of graphics settings to play around with so you really can tune its visuals and performance to your heart's content. Finding the sweet spot is a tricky business though, particularly since most of the graphics settings require a restart to apply. 

That said, there's plenty to be gained from turning up the graphics options in Red Dead Redemption 2 as high as you feasibly can. It's a stunningly realised cinematic experience and you'll see in these comparison screenshots that higher visuals add a great deal to the environment and character design. You can any of the screenshots below to see an enlarged screenshot.

This first comparison is taken from the city of Saint-Denis, a fairly dense urban environment which is one of the more demanding areas on console. You can see the ground textures and texture filtering lend a very muddy image quality to Low, while Ultra benefits from more realistic shadows, improved grass, and a nice bit of volumetric lighting popping through the trees on the right hand side.

(slide your cursor over the images to compare. Click to enlarge)

In this pair of building interior screenshots you get a good feel for the graphical improvements which come from Ultra. The most obvious is the extra detail which comes from the higher resolution textures, while Arthur Morgan himself is a night and day difference between Low and Ultra. Low has some basic AO and shadow effects but overall it pales in comparison to the level of detail showcase on Ultra.

Here we have an example which demonstrates that Low doesn't have to be terrible, particularly during some of the more scenic moments. The two certainly look comparable, although Ultra pulls ahead in terms of the density of the foliage and both the resolution and detail of the water reflections.

Slight tangent but this road right below here is my favourite street in Red Dead Redemption 2. It looks proper Deadwood. It's also a handy place to compare the lighting effects, where Ultra pulls ahead in a big way. The lighting on Low is fairly flat and one dimensional; areas are either light or dark. Ultra presents a far more natural hue and we can also see light pooling out from the stores and bars.

We'll have plenty more on Red Dead Redemption 2 shortly as there's a lot to sink our teeth into in terms of its performance and visuals. If you're on the edge about whether your rig can run this game you're going to want to wait until you can read up on some benchmarks as this game is a heck of a lot more demanding than the innocuous system specs would have you believe.

Red Dead Redemption 2 PC Performance Report - Graphics card benchmarks

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
-3
Offline
12:29 Nov-08-2019

GTA v Has better Graphics

1
Rep
191
Offline
junior admin badge
11:22 Nov-06-2019

Great article Jon.

0
Rep
43
Offline
08:29 Nov-06-2019

fastest way to implement low graphics settings: just delete the textures

3
Rep
81
Online
admin approved badge
03:42 Nov-06-2019

It's so rare to see games with an actual big difference between low and ultra. Looking forward to tinker with it next month :D

0
Rep
159
Offline
admin approved badge
01:16 Nov-06-2019

It's amazing how the quality of game's graphic on consoles is much better than the lowest on PC

0
Rep
191
Offline
junior admin badge
11:23 Nov-06-2019

1 word
Optimization

3
Rep
-19
Offline
00:17 Nov-06-2019

the second photo reminds me of fallout 3 on low. there is definately a difference between the two.

0
Rep
39
Offline
20:30 Nov-05-2019

I better not need those lowest textures. especially since GTA V very high textures look way better than the lowest here and work fine. at 1.5gb

0
Rep
-13
Offline
20:22 Nov-05-2019

Best trick i use with demanding games is set everything to low with textures set to high and i get great framerates and a decent looking game

5
Rep
4
Offline
admin approved badge
19:29 Nov-05-2019

not impress at all with these graphics, I was expecting gta enb/ice-enhancer level graphics

3
Rep
93
Offline
18:16 Nov-05-2019

This is quite a big difference, especially the textures.

1
Rep
116
Offline
17:43 Nov-05-2019

Those are extremely low res textures. Looks like the game is covered in Vaseline.

3
Rep
94
Offline
19:12 Nov-05-2019

At least you'll have smooth framerates with low settings :D

3
Rep
15
Offline
admin approved badge
20:19 Nov-05-2019

Textures are overrated, I'd rather have plain, flat colors.


J/k


2

Can They Run... |

| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Core i5-9300H 4-Core 2.4GHz GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 8GB
Core i3-2100 3.1GHz Radeon HD 6570 4GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 MSI Gaming X 6G Edition 16GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 1080p
Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 MSI Gaming X 6G Edition 16GB
Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz GeForce RTX 2060 MSI Ventus XS OC 6GB 16GB
100% Yes [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Low, 1080p
Core i7-2600 4-Core 3.40GHz Radeon R9 280X MSI Gaming 3GB Edition 8GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core 3.7GHz GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gainward Ghost 8GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 7 3750H 4-Core 2.3 GHz GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 16GB
| 60FPS, High, 1080p
Ryzen 5 5600H 6-Core 3.3GHz GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 16GB
0% No [1 votes]
| 60FPS, Ultra, 1080p
FX-6300 Radeon RX 550X 4GB 16GB
| Medium, 1080p
FX-6300 Radeon RX 550X 4GB 16GB
0% No [2 votes]