A new Rockstar game launching on Steam is huge news. Or at least, we always thought it was. Times change though; the industry shifts. Red Dead Redemption 2 launched on Steam on Thursday, arriving not so much with a bang but with the rasping noise emitted by a cowpoke who’s spent one too many starry nights living on canned beans.
On its first night on Steam, Red Dead Redemption 2 peaked at just under 12,000 concurrent players. Fortunately for Rockstar, this number doubled to 24,000 by Friday. Despite this, it still means that fewer people are playing Red Dead Redemption 2 on Steam right now than are playing Civilization VI, Euro Truck Simulator 2, Monster Hunter World, or even Terraria. In fact, it’s less than a quarter of the number of people who are playing Grand Theft Auto V right now, a game which is now almost five years old.
These are absolutely not the figures we expect from a flagship Rockstar release. Compare it, if you will, to GTA 5’s release. Grand Theft Auto 5 hit a peak of 364,548 concurrent players at launch. RDR2's peak player count is just 6.5% of this figure. Look at Halo: Reach, as well. Microsoft’s shooter peaked at 161,024 Steam players despite being available on Game Pass as well. Halo Reach has sold 2 million copies in a week, making it the second biggest Steam launch of the entire year. Either something’s gone very, very wrong for Rockstar here or it speaks to a number of other potential reasons.
The first and most obvious thing is that Red Dead Redemption 2 has already been out a month on PC. You could only buy it through the Rockstar Games Launcher or the Epic Games Store but you could buy it all the same.
Epic Store ‘haters’ are very vocal but there’s been a sneaking suspicion for a while now that they are a minority, and this could lend further credence to that school of thought. The vast majority of gamers don’t frequent Reddit to put developers on blast. In fact, most probably don’t discuss games online at all. They hear about the games they want, they buy them from one of the places available to them, and that’s about it. These folks probably couldn’t help but overheard the news that Red Dead Redemption 2 was coming to PC but could definitely miss the fact it would be coming to Steam a month later. Even armed with that knowledge, the simple fact is most people simply couldn’t care less that the Rockstar Games Launcher doesn’t have community features or user reviews, it’s literally nothing more than a point of sale which sits between them and playing the game they want.
That’s not the only factor at play, of course. Some will have already played Red Dead Redemption 2 on consoles. RDR2 inherently has less mass appeal than GTA 5. Plenty will have been put off by talk of Red Dead’s poor PC performance.
Then there’s price to consider. Paying $60 for a game on day one is one thing. We all know the feeling of wanting to get in there and play at the earliest possible moment - to ride the wave of hype. The problem is, every day after launch, that $60 price tag begins to look less and less appealing. Hype subsides and sale prices begin to enter our minds. Heck, RDR2 has already been discounted by 20% on the EGS. Not only are you waiting longer to play the game through Steam, you’re also paying more.
The fact it’s got to boot through the Rockstar Games Launcher regardless of where you buy it kind of makes the original storefront moot anyway. Why wait an entire month just add another layer through which Red Dead 2 must boot? It takes a special kind of loyalty to Steam to see it through to the bitter end.
With so many factors at play it's almost impossible to determine exactly what's going on here but this certainly isn't the huge launch we've come to expect from Rockstar. Millions of copies of Red Dead Redemption 2 may have been sold through the Rockstar Launcher and EGS for all we know, or the performance reports could've scared folks off.
Based on the information we do have then, what do you think is to blame for Red Dead's slow start on Steam? And where did you end up buying your copy? Let us know below!
Login or Register to join the debate
PC Specs
Ill rather get the goty edition. Sad rockstar has opted to making DLC for online and not single player DLC
PC Specs
I thought I'd wait for Steam release but didn't had the patience for that, bought it on Rockstar Launcher. The game is great, I play mostly online.
PC Specs
Still waiting.
Personally, RDR 2 should have just stayed on the consoles if they were going to put forth such a poor effort releasing this for PC.
PC Specs
I played on friends console a long time ago newer games more important, bring to PC same time as console is a thing for me & if already played before.
PC Specs
Im saving money for ice borne for pc and cyberpunk
PC Specs
i mean cyberpunk doesnt come out until April soo
PC Specs
Launched the same day as halo
PC Specs
Never gonna buy it! Never bought GTA V either.IF they put the first on PC,we will consider...
PC Specs
It's a broken mess so no wonder.
PC Specs
Thats not true and you know it. That is just mildly exxagerated. I havent had any issues with my game and have been playing it since launch
PC Specs
So let's be very clear.. just because you have been fortunate enough to play the game without any issues, doesnt mean its false. I am having issues with it 2.
PC Specs
The launcher has been giving repeated crashes and freezing unexpectedly. The end result is that they didn't do quality assurance testing on their title prior.
PC Specs
Yeah, that wasnt what i meant though verry unclear and badly explained. What I meant was that the culture right know is jump on the hate train and just spread ****, this isnt the case with RDR2, there have been alot of issues.
PC Specs
After GTAO, I'm going to wait for a Steam sale and then pick it up since there probably won't be any DLC as they will focus on the Online aspect of the game.
PC Specs
Rockstar this time tried really hard to double dip into people's pockets. So even theit next games are a no buy for me until they release everything on all platforms simultaneously.
PC Specs
I think its not because most people bought it earlier, its because people are not buying it.
PC Specs
Well it does not take a genius to realize the fact that the game has poor optimization(does not run well even on high end hardware)and had a broken launch with discounts even in the 1st month.I am not buying this game anytime soon.I would rather play it pirated first just to be sure its worth my cash.
PC Specs
Waiting for a 70% discount, not worth 60 bucks for a 1 year old game, also the thechnicall issues put me off buying it.
PC Specs
Knowing Rockstar you are gonna wait a long time before that discount
PC Specs
Lol you're absolutley right. Rockstar games rarely lose value. They are like Apple products in that sense.
PC Specs
So u want me to pay such a huge amount only for renting it, yeah right. That too for a game which is not optimized.
PC Specs
I'd rather buy it from GoG or w8 some more to play Cyberpunk2077 instead.
PC Specs
This one isn't rented. You buy it, you play it. It's not in a paid subscription.
PC Specs
There are many factors that could be why the steam launch is muted, from the reports of the myriad of issues the game of Epic and even Rockstars own store have had, the fact that its straight up broken for some people and the fact that even the base normal game is a bit pricey. People might be reasonably waiting for it to be in a playable state or just waiting for christmas, I know I am.
PC Specs
I am waiting for it to go on sale, currently $90 AUD for Standard Edition and up to $140 AUD for Ultimate so it's a pricey atm. Waiting until Xmas sale (maybe -15%) or Back-to-School sale (-20%+)
PC Specs
After GTA5 I just don't feel like ever buying a Rockstar title again.
PC Specs
I've played on my friend's PC and It's poorly optimized
I've played both Rockstar Launcher and Steam version and they both are the same too many glitches and crashes I'd rather play GTAV than RDR2
PC Specs
I bought it on the Rockstar launcher, pre-ordered like a day or two before for the free special edition upgrade. I wanted it anyway and was unaware of the issues. it was still playable for me and I thoroughly enjoyed the story, though it was really slow-paced, the moments of intensity really popped. 9/10 story, 8/10 mission variety, 3/10 free roam because the world's so big and there's not much to see besides woods and more woods, though the vast difference between "states" is really cool.
PC Specs
I've not played much of the game yet, but it does seem very slow-paced in general so far.
PC Specs
yeah after the tutorial (the whole winter bit) it does pick up but it's still rather slow going from place-to-place because most of the time you're wanted and can't fast travel. luckily you never have to cross the whole map, but it's way slower than RDR1, and I think that's fine for what it's going for. It doesn't start hitting you fast and hard until the last..2 acts-ish of the story.
PC Specs
With Halo Reach being out I'm gonna put in a couple 100s hours into it before I consider getting RDRD2.