AMD announces TressFX 4.1 simulated hair and fur rendering for UE4, DirectX 12 and Vulkan

Written by Jon Sutton on Wed, Jan 29, 2020 11:40 AM

Remember the days when TressFX used to be an ultra-demanding feature which crushed graphics cards across the land? I don’t anyone can forget Lara Croft’s haunted ponytail flapping through the air. TressFX is absolutely still a widespread feature though, used for both hair/fur rendering and simulation technology.

It’s a hot topic once again now AMD has announced the TressFX 4.1 framework. This latest version has full Unreal Engine 4.22 integration and includes additional optimisation for the physics simulation shaders, new rendering features, improved tutorials and an updated TressFX Exporter for Autodesk Maya.

In a nutshell, this should mean TressFX is easier for developers to use than ever before. The UE4 integration will offer additional components as well as simulation material support, DirectX 12 and Vulkan compatibility, additional features such as StrandUV and Hair Parameter Blending, as well as more fine-tuned control of Level of Detail (LOD), which alters the distance at which high quality hair/fur is rendered in.

For gamers, this means more complex and therefore more realistic hair and fur simulation in games. Far Cry’s honey badgers will look that bit furrier, for example, or characters’ hair movement will be more realistically simulated.

Sadly, the number of games which actually support TressFX is still punishingly small. The Tomb Raider games are the big ones, of course, as well as Deus Ex: Mankind Divided. All in all, however, TressFX hasn’t been utilised to the degree AMD was hoping. Perhaps this renewed and enhanced implementation of TressFX 4.1 could encourage more developers to give it a shot.

Login or Register to join the debate

Rep
37
Offline
09:52 Jan-31-2020

I wonder if nvidia's hairworks is going to get a sudden big update like PhysX right after AMD showed their new FEMFX physics thing.

1
Rep
97
Offline
admin approved badge
23:08 Jan-29-2020

Hairworks but it actually works.


Now it works even better!

1
Rep
58
Offline
admin approved badge
11:47 Jan-29-2020

Yeah so basically like Hairworks from Nvidida

1
Rep
116
Offline
11:59 Jan-29-2020

TressFX is half a decade old tech now. It is basically Hairworks but it runs on any hardware, uses a ton less resources and looks comparatively rather similar.

13
Rep
12
Offline
12:48 Jan-29-2020

Affectionately nicknamed "bugworks". It works poorly even on Nvidia cards.


TressFX is much lighter, and with AMD's experience in low-level APIs, it can be much better implemented.


It's what I expect.

1
Rep
272
Offline
admin approved badge
17:40 Jan-29-2020

That is...if anyone actually bothers to use it...

3
Rep
16
Offline
19:48 Jan-31-2020

I can give NVIDIA my cat, i recently discovered that he is able to copy and paste, or at least i found 24 copies of ProPlus2019Retail ( OFFICE) and the cat was roaming on the keyboard. So as soon as i'm able to teach him how to select and copying a function, i have a coder for behavior paid in tuna cans, perhaps he'll be able to fix hairworks.

0

Can They Run... |

Ryzen 5 3500U 4-Core 2.1 GHz Radeon RX Vega 8 8GB
| 30FPS, Medium, 720p
Ryzen 5 3500U 4-Core 2.1 GHz Radeon RX Vega 8 10GB
| 30FPS, High, 1080p
Core i3-8100 4-Core 3.6GHz GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 16GB
100% Yes [2 votes]